Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T10:02:51.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disorder, dictatorship and government effectiveness: cross-national evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

Andrew Whitford  and
Soo-Young Lee
Andrew Whitford*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Administration and Policy, University of Georgia, Athens, USA
Soo-Young Lee*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University, Korea
*
professor andrew b. whitford Department of Public Administration and Policy, University of Georgia, 204 Baldwin Hall, Athens, Georgia 30602-1615, USA, Tel: 706 542 2898, Fax: 706 583 0610, Email: aw@uga.edu
assistant professor soo-young lee Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University, 599 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Korea 151-742, Tel.: 82 2 880 5575, Fax: 82 2 882 3998, Email: soo3121@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Institutional design balances the costs and benefits of dictatorship and disorder. Democracy can be efficient if it improves the performance of government. Yet, sometimes authoritarian governments can be efficient if they reduce disorder. We show that democratisation has a non-linear effect on income-adjusted perceptions of government effectiveness. These findings present a new opportunity to revisit the study of government performance for researchers working in public administration and political science.

Keywords

Democratisationdictatorshipdisordergovernment effectiveness
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , 06 March 2012 , pp. 5 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S.Robinson, J. (2000) The colonial origins of comparative development: an Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review 91(5): 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.Yared, P. (2008) Income and democracy. American Economic Review 98(3): 808–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adserà, A., Boix, C.Payne, M. (2003) Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2): 445–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäck, H.Hadenius, A. (2008) Democracy and state capacity: exploring a J-shaped relationship. Governance 21(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, R. (2002) Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. (1997) Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-country Empirical Study. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barro, R. (1999) Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy 107(6): 158–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P.Walsh, P. (2001) New tools in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15(1): 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschken, H. L. (1994) Organizational performance and multiple constituencies. Public Administration Review 54(3): 308–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, G. A. (2002) Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: an evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money & Management 22(2): 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, G. A. (2003) Sources of public service improvement: a critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(3): 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, G. A. (2004) Does administrative reform improve bureaucratic performance? A cross-country empirical analysis. Public Finance and Management 4(3): 399–428.Google Scholar
Brewer, G. A. (2006) All measures of performance are subjective: more evidence on US federal agencies. In Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. G. A. Boyne et al. (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, G. A.Coleman Seldon, S. (2000) Why elephants gallop: assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(4): 685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, G. A., Choi, Y.Walker, R. M. (2007) Accountability, corruption, and government effectiveness in Asia: an exploration of World Bank Governance Indicators. International Public Management Review 8(2): 200–218.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M.Morrow, J. D. (2003) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charron, N.Lapuente, V. (2010) Does democracy produce quality of government? European Journal of Political Research 49(4): 443–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, Y. H.Rainey, H. G. (2005) Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. Federal Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 529–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G. W.McCubbins, M. D. (2005) Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1947) The science of public administration: three problems. Public Administration Review 7(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F.Shleifer, A. (2003) The new comparative economics. Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fesler, J. W. (1942) Area and Administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, J.Thacker, S. C. (2004) Political institutions and corruption: the role of unitarism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science 34: 295–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. H. (1993) Econometric Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gurr, T. R., Marshall, M.Jaggers, K. (2003) Polity IV Project: political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2003. Available online: www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polityGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S., McCubbins, M. D.Shugart, M. S. (2001) ‘Policy making in presidential systems’. In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy. Stephan Haggard and Mathew D. McCubbins (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hicklin, A., Jr.O'Toole, L. J.Meier, K. J. (2008) Serpents in the sand: managerial networking and nonlinear influences on organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2): 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingraham, P. W.Moynihan, D. P. (2000) Evolving dimensions of performance from the CSRA to the present. In The future of merit: Twenty years after the Civil Service Reform Act, James P. Pfiffner and Douglas A. Brook (Eds), 103–126. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ingraham, P. W., Joyce, P. G.Donahue, A. K. (2003) Government Performance: Why Management Matters. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A.Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1999) Governance Matters. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2196. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A.Mastruzzi, M. (2007) Governance Matters VI: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2006. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4280. Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. (2004) Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(2): 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirlin, J. (2001) Big questions for a significant public administration. Public Administration Review 61(2): 140–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kmenta, J. (1986) Elements of Econometrics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Knack, S. (2002) Social capital and the quality of government: evidence from the states. American Journal of Political Science 46: 772–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, S.Keefer, P. (1995) Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics 7: 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzman, C., Werun, R.Burkhart, R. E. (2002) Democracy's effect on economic growth: a pooled time-series analysis, 1951–1980. Studies in Comparative International Development 37(1): 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A.Vishny, R. W. (1997) Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance 52(3): 1131–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A.Vishny, R. W. (1999) The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15(1): 222–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A.Vishny, R. W. (2000) Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58(1): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.Whitford, A. B. (2009) Government effectiveness in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11(2): 249–281.Google Scholar
Jr.Lynn, L. E., Heinrich, C. J.Hill, C. J. (2000) Studying governance and public management: challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2): 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, M. C.Jr.Olson, M. (1996) The economics of autocracy and majority rule: the invisible hand and the use of force. Journal of Economic Literature 34(1): 72–96.Google Scholar
Meier, K. J., Jr.O'Toole, L. J., Boyne, G. A.Walker, R. M. (2007) Strategic management and the performance of public organizations: testing venerable ideas against recent theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17(3): 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montinola, G. R.Jackman, R. W. (2002) Sources of corruption: a cross-country study. British Journal of Political Science 32(1): 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. P.Pandey, S. K. (2005) Testing how management matters in an era of government by performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3): 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jr.O'Toole, L. J.Meier, K. J. (1999) Modeling the impact of public management: implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9(4): 505–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jr.O'Toole, L. J.Meier, K. J. (2003) Plus ça change: public management, personnel stability, and organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(1): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, T.Tabellini, G. (1994) Is inequality harmful for growth? American Economic Review 84(3): 149–187.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1977) Usefulness of the concept. In Goodman P. S. and Pennings J. M. (eds.), New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.Google Scholar
Pitts, D. W. (2005) Diversity, representation, and performance: evidence about race and ethnicity in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 615–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provan, K. G.Milward, H. B. (1995) A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: a comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provan, K. G.Brinton, M. H. (2001) Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 61(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rainey, H. G.Steinbauer, P. (1999) Galloping elephants: developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9(1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, J. E.Evans, P. B. (2000) Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics 75(1): 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Selden, S. C.Sowa, J. E. (2004) Testing a multi-dimensional model of organizational performance: prospects and problems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, L. (2007) When will a dictator be good? Economic Theory 31: 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, M. S.Carey, J. M. (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, D. (2000) The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics 76(3): 399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Walle, S. (2006) The state of the world's bureaucracies. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 8(4): 437–448.Google Scholar
Walker, R. M.Boyne, G. A. (2006) Public management reform and organizational performance: an empirical assessment of the UK Labour government's public service improvement strategy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 25(2): 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitford, A. B., Lee, S., Yun, T.Jung, C. (2010) Collaborative behavior and the performance of government agencies. International Public Management Journal 13(4): 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wintrobe, R. (1998) The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittman, D. (1989) Why democracies produce efficient results. Journal of Political Economy 97: 1395–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, P. J. (1993) A case survey of bureaucratic effectiveness in US cabinet agencies: preliminary results. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3(2): 161–181.Google Scholar
Wolf, P. J. (1997) Why must we reinvent the federal government? Putting historical developmental claims to the test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 7(3): 353–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, K.Holzer, M. (2006) The performance–trust link: implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review 66(1): 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeger, S. L.Liang, K. (1986) Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 42: 121–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeger, S. L., Liang, K.Albert, P. S. (1988) Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 44(4): 1049–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorn, C. (2001) Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data: a review with applications. American Journal of Political Science 45: 470–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar