Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:24:46.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Holding agencies accountable: Exploring the effect of oversight on citizens’ approval of members of Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2019

Susan M. Miller  and
Alexander I. Ruder
Susan M. Miller
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina, USA E-mail: sumiller@mailbox.sc.edu
Alexander I. Ruder
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, USA E-mail: alexander.ruder@atl.frb.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We seek to understand the incentives facing Congress members to hold executive agencies accountable. Specifically, we explore whether Congress members are rewarded for taking politically costly oversight actions. We evaluate the effect of oversight activities on citizens’ evaluations of Congress members, taking into account the member’s partisanship, the citizen’s partisanship and agency ideology. Using a survey experiment, we find evidence that citizens’ evaluations of members are affected by the members’ oversight activity, with both copartisan and cross-party members rewarded for oversight efforts. Politically costly actions against ally agencies, however, do not appear to be rewarded to a greater extent by copartisans. These results provide insight into the way in which citizens interpret oversight activities by Congress members, suggesting that while good governance actions hold value for citizens, costly oversight actions aimed at ally agencies are not rewarded by copartisan citizens more than politically expedient oversight actions.

Keywords

congressional oversightaccountabilitycongressional approvalpublic opinion
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 2020 , pp. 672 - 693
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Open Market Committee, Federal Reserve Board of Governors, or others in the Federal Reserve System.

References

Aberbach, JD (1990) Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Aberbach, J (2002) What’s Happened to the Watchful Eye? Congress & the Presidency 29: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, JE (2010) Public Policymaking, 7th ed. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Balla, SJ and Deering, CJ (2013) Police Patrols and Fire Alarms: An Empirical Examination of the Legislative Preference for Oversight. Congress & the Presidency 40(1): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, MA and Groeling, T (2009) Shot by the Messenger: Partisan Cues and Public Opinion Regarding National Security and War. Political Behavior 31: 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, A, Huber, G and Lenz, G (2012) Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research:Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20(3): 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, AM and Grose, CR (2011) The Lengthened Shadow of Another Institution? Ideal Point Estimates for the Executive Branch and Congress. American Journal of Political Science 55: 767–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cable News Network (CNN) (2018) CNN Poll, August, 2018 How important will each of the following be to your vote for Congress this year (2018)? … Corruption. 31115414.00017. Social Science Research Solutions (SSRS). Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL (accessed 2 December 2018).Google Scholar
Chen, J and Johnson, T (2015) Federal Employee Unionization and Presidential Control of the Bureaucracy: Estimating and Explaining Ideological Change in Executive Agencies. Journal of Theoretical Politics 27(1): 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, S, Jewell, RM and Waggoner, PD (2015) Are Samples Drawn from Mechanical Turk Valid for Research on Political Ideology? Research and Politics 2(4): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, JD, Bertelli, A, Grose, CR, Lewis, DE and Nixon, DC (2012) Separated Powers in the United States: The Ideology of Agencies, Presidents, and Congress. American Journal of Political Science 56: 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, JD and Lewis, DE (2008) Expert Opinion, Agency Characteristics, and Agency Preferences. Political Analysis 16: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colaresi, M (2012) A Boom with Review: How Retrospective Oversight Increases the Foreign Policy Ability of Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 671–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppock, A (2018) Generalizing from Survey Experiments Conducted on Mechanical Turk: A Replication Approach. Political Science Research and Methods. 1–16. doi:http://www.10.1017/psrm.2018.10 Google Scholar
Doherty, D (2015) How Policy and Procedure Shape Citizens’ Evaluations of Senators. Legislative Studies Quarterly 40(2): 241–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, D and O’Halloran, S (1995) A Theory of Strategic Oversight. The Journal of Law, Economic, & Organization 11(2): 227–255.Google Scholar
Grant, JT and Rudolph, TJ (2004) The Job of Representation in Congress: Public Expectations and Representative Approval. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(3): 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbridge, L and Malhotra, N (2011) Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress: Evidence from Survey Experiments. American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 494–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbridge, L, Malhotra, N and Harrison, BF (2014) Public Preferences for Bipartisanship in the Policymaking Process. Legislative Studies Quarterly 39(3): 327–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, LK (2005) Accountability and America’s Secret Foreign Policy: Keeping a Legislative Eye on the Central Intelligence Agency. Foreign Policy Analysis 1: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, DR (2013) Do Major Policy Enactments Affect Public Evaluations of Congress? The Case of Health Care Reform. Legislative Studies Quarterly 38(2): 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiley, J (2017) In Polarized Era, Fewer Americans Hold a Mix of Conservative and Liberal Views. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/23/in-polarized-era-fewer-americans-hold-a-mix-of-conservative-and-liberal-views/ (accessed June 2019).Google Scholar
Kriner, DL and Schickler, E (2014) Investigating the President: Committee Probes and Presidential Approval, 1953–2006., Journal of Politics 76(2): 521–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, D and Schwartz, L (2008) Divided Government and Congressional Investigations. Legislative Studies Quarterly 33(2): 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnikov, Y and Levine, AS (2014) Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity. Journal of Experimental Political Science 1: 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, JA and McGrath, RJ (2016) Retrospective Congressional Oversight and the Dynamics of Legislative Influence over the Bureaucracy. Legislative Studies Quarterly 41(4): 899–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvel, JD and McGrath, RJ (2016) Congress as Manager: Oversight Hearings and Agency Morale. Journal of Public Policy 36(3): 489–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, M and Schwartz, T (1984) Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science 2: 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, RJ (2013) Congressional Oversight Hearings and Policy Control. Legislative Studies Quarterly 38(3): 349–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, SM (2016) Public Support for Sale: Government Spending and Public Approval of Federal Agency Performance. American Politics Research 44(3): 523–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullinix, KJ, Leeper, TJ, Druckman, JN and Freese, J (2015) The Generalizability of Survey Experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newsweek (2006) Princeton Survey Research Associates International/Newsweek Poll, November 2006. As I read you some things the new Democratic Congress might do over the next two years, please tell me if you think each should be one of their top priorities, a lower priority, or should not be done at all. What about … investigating government contracts in Iraq? USPSRNEW.111106.R13G. Princeton Survey Research Associates International. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL (accessed 2 December 2018).Google Scholar
Parker, DCW and Dull, M (2009) Divided We Quarrel: The Politics of Congressional Investigations, 1947–2004. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34(3):319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, DCW and Dull, M (2013) Rooting Out Waste, Fraud, and Abuse: The Politics of House Committee Investigations, 1947 to 2004. Political Research Quarterly 66: 630–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center (2015) Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government. http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2015/11/11-23-2015-Governance-release.pdf (accessed June 2019).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2017) With Budget Debate Looming, Growing Share of Public Prefers Bigger Government. https://www.people-press.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2017/04/04-24-17-Spending-release.pdf (accessed June 2019).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2018) Growing Partisan Differences in Views of the FBI; Stark Divide Over ICE. https://www.people-press.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/07/07-24-2018-Federal-Agencies-release1.pdf (accessed June 2019).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, Council on Foreign Relations (2005) Pew Research Center for the People & the Press/CFR America’s Place In The World Survey, October 2005. Is your overall opinion of…the Defense Department very favorable, mostly favorable, mostly unfavorable, or very unfavorable? USPSRA.102505.R07LF2. Princeton Survey Research Associates International. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL (accessed 2 June 2019).Google Scholar
Potter, RA and Shipan, CR (2019) Agency Rulemaking in a Separation of Powers System. Journal of Public Policy 39(1): 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, MD, Clinton, JD and Lewis, DE (2018) Elite Perceptions of Agency Ideology and Workforce Skill. Journal of Politics 80(1): 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santiso, C (2006) Banking on Accountability? Strengthening Budget Oversight and Public Sector Auditing in Emerging Economies. Public Budgeting & Finance 26(2): 66–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, BF, Schiller, WJ and Sellers, PJ (2003) Tactical and Contextual Determinants of U.S. Senators’ Approval Ratings. Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(2): 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulkin, T, Testa, P and Usry, K (2015) What Gets Rewarded? Legislative Activity and Constituency Approval. Political Research Quarterly 68(4): 690–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USA Today (2010) Gallup/USA Today Poll, Aug, 2010. How important will each of the following issues be to your vote for Congress this year (2010)—How about…corruption in government? US-GALLUP.10AUG027.R10A. Gallup Organization. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, iPOLL (accessed 2 December 2018).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Miller and Ruder Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/RURFHL
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Miller and Ruder supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Miller and Ruder supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 134.9 KB