Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:07:11.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How do policy ideas spread among international administrations? Policy entrepreneurs and bureaucratic influence in the UN response to AIDS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2012

Olivier Nay
Olivier Nay*
Affiliation:
Institut Universitaire de France, University of Lille Northern France
*
professor o. nay Political Science, University of Lille Northern France & Institut Universitaire de France, CERAPS, 1 Place Déliot, 59000 Lille, France, Tel: +33 158 94 04 98, Fax: +33 320 90 77 00, Email: o.nay@free.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on the circulation of policy ideas within international administrations. Based upon a study of UNAIDS, the Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS, it shows how bureaucracies can capitalise on policy-oriented information and knowledge to strengthen their influence within their own environment. Using a policy transfer approach as its analytical framework, the paper draws particular attention to the UNAIDS Secretariat, considered as a “transfer entrepreneur”. It argues that, in the 2000s, the Secretariat has demonstrated a capacity to collect, develop and disseminate policy ideas and, consequently, has gradually participated in UN policy development on AIDS. It thus suggests that the Secretariat has extended its authority within the UN system despite limited resources. In conclusion, the paper points out the need to examine policy transfer among international administrations through actors, interests and strategies, as a complement to holistic approaches.1

Keywords

AIDSbureaucratic influenceinternational organisationspolicy entrepreneursUnited Nations
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , 06 March 2012 , pp. 53 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, A. (2004) How ideas spread: whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization 58(2): 229–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M.Finnemore, M. (2004) Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, S. (2006) Does bureaucracy really matter? The authority of intergovernmental treaty secretariats in global environmental politics. Global Environment Politics 6(1): 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, D. (2004) The unseen hand in treat reform negotiations: the role and influence of the council secretariat. Journal of European Public Policy 11(3): 408–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C. J. (1991) What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science 21(2): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C. J.Howlett, M. (1992) The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Science 25(3): 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F.Siebenhüner, B. (eds.) (2009) Managers of Global Change: the Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. Cambridge, Mass: the MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, P-O. (2006) The secretariat of the climate convention. Make a living in a straitjacket. Global Governance Working Paper 22.Google Scholar
Common, R. K. (1998) Convergence and transfer: a review of the globalisation of new public management. International Journal of Public Sector Management 11(6): 440–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, M., Lalenis, K.Mamadouh, V. (eds.) (2008) The Theory and Practice of Institutional Transplantation: Experiences with the Transfer of Policy Institutions. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
De Wet, E. (2008) Governance through promotion and persuasion: the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. German Law Journal 9(11): 1429–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Y.Garth, B. G. (2002) legitimating the new legal orthodoxy. In Dezalay Y. and Garth B. G. (eds.), Global Prescription. The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 306–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, W. W.Powell, P. J. (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolowitz, D.Marsh, D. (1996) Who learns what from whom: a review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies 44(2): 343–357.Google Scholar
Dolowitz, D.Marsh, D. (2000) Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy making. Governance 13(1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M.Davies, J. (1999) Understanding policy transfer: a multi-level, multi-disciplinary perspective. Public Administration 77(2): 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, M. (1993) International organizations as teachers of norms: UNESCO and science policy. International Organization 47(4): 565–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, M.Sikkink, K. (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52(4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
German Law Journal (2008) The exercise of public authority by international institutions. Special Issue 9(11).Google Scholar
Haas, E. B. (1992) When Knowledge is Power. Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hassenteufel, P. (2005) De la comparaison internationale à la comparaison transnationale: les déplacements de la construction d'objets comparatifs en matière de politiques publiques. Revue française de science politique 55(1): 113–132.Google Scholar
Joachim, J., Reinalda, B.Verbeek, B. (eds.) (2007) International Organizations and Implementation: Enforcers, Managers, Authorities? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.Martin, L. (1995) The promise of institutionalist theory. International Security 20(1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Kohlmorgen, L. (2007) International governmental organizations and global health governance: the role of the WHO, World Bank and UNAIDS. In Hein W., Bartsch S. and Kohlmorgen L. (eds.), Global Health Governance and the Fight against HIV/AIDS. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ladi, S. (2000) Globalisation, think tanks and policy transfer. In Stone D. (ed.), Banking on Knowledge: the Genesis of the Global Development Network. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lisk, F. (2010) Global Institutions and the HIV/AIDS Epidemic. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marcussen, M. (2004) The organization for economic cooperation and development as ideational artist and arbitrator: reality or dream? In Reinalda B., Verbeek B. (eds.), Decision Making within International Organizations. Abingdon: Routledge, 90–105.Google Scholar
Martin, L.Simmons, B. (1998) Theories and empirical studies of international institutions. International Organization 52(4): 729–753.Google Scholar
Mathiason, J. (2007) Invisible Governance: International Secretariats in World Politics. Sterlin, VA: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, D.Rush, D. (1993) Cross national diffusion of movement ideas. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 528: 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCown, T. L. (2005) Policy entrepreneurs and policy change: strategies beyond agenda setting. Paper prepared for the 2005 Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1–4 September.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W.Scott, W. R. (eds.) (1992) Organizational Environment: Rituals and Rationality. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. (1997) Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 738–770.Google Scholar
Nay, O.Smith, A. (eds.) (2002) Le gouvernement du compromis. Courtiers et généralistes dans l'action politique. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Nay, O. (2011) What drives reforms in international organizations? External pressure and bureaucratic entrepreneurs in the UN response to AIDS. Governance: an International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 24(4): 689–712.Google Scholar
Park, S. (2005) Norm diffusion within international organizations: a case study of the World Bank. Journal of International Relations and Development 8: 111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. (1997) Policy transfers between governments: the case of administrative reforms. West European Politics 20(4): 71–88.Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. (2000) Policy transfer in the European union: isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance 13(1): 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinalda, B.Verbeek, B. (eds.) (1998) Autonomous Policy Making by International Organizations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinicke, W.Deng, F. (eds.) (2000) Critical Choices: The UN, Networks and the Future of Global Governance. Ottawa: International Development Research Center.Google Scholar
Roberts, N. C.King, P. J. (1991) Policy entrepreneurs: their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1(2): 147–175.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1991): What is lesson drawing. Journal of Public Policy 11(1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. W.Christensen, S. (eds.) (1995) The Institutional Construction of Organizations: International and Longitudinal Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Slagter, T. (2004) International norm entrepreneurs: a role for middle powers? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association. Montreal, Canada, 17 March.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. (1993) The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (1999) learning lessons and transferring policy across time, space and disciplines. Politics 19(1): 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. (2000) Learning lessons, policy transfer and the international diffusion of policy ideas. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalization. 9 September. (Available online.)Google Scholar
Stone, D. (2004) Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy 11(3): 545–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNAIDS (2005) Final report of the Global Task Team on Improving AIDS Coordination Among Multilateral Institutions and International Donors. Geneva: June 14.Google Scholar
Venske, I. (2008) International bureaucracies from a political science perspective: agency, authority and international institutional law. German Law Journal 9(11): 1401–1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weissert, C. S. (1991) Policy entrepreneurs, policy opportunists, and legislative effectiveness. American Politics Research 19(2): 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteside, A. (2007) HIV/AIDS and development: failures of vision and imagination. In Poku N., Whiteside A., Sandkjaer B. (eds.), AIDS and Governance. Aldershot: Ashgate, 115–131.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. B. (1979) Speaking Truth to Power: the Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Wolman, H.Page, E. (2002) Policy transfer among local governments: an information-theory approach. Governance 15(4): 477–501.Google Scholar