Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:49:38.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The politics of redistribution in local governments: the effect of gender representation on welfare spending in California counties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2014

Sanghee Park
Sanghee Park*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Policy and Administration, Boise State University, Idaho, USA E-mail: selotus@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research explores the impact of gender representation at the state and local levels on redistributive choices. This research also examines whether female officeholders moderate the impact of the local economy and institution on welfare spending. Hypotheses are tested across 58 counties in California over ten years, between 2001 and 2010. According to the fixed effect models, women in state legislature had a positive effect on local welfare spending, while women on county boards had no significant effect. However, a positive moderating effect of women on county boards during economic hardship was found. Three categories of control variables include institutional factors, such as the introduction of Proposition 1A and county home rule; political factors, such as the political preference of each county’s residents and strength of non-profit organisations; and socio-economic factors, such as intergovernmental revenue, unemployment rate and demographics. Counties with more intergovernmental revenue and supporters of Democratic presidential candidates are likely to spend more on welfare services.

Keywords

Californiaeconomygender representationintergovernmental revenuepolitical ideologysocial welfare
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , August 2014 , pp. 269 - 301
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alozie, N. and McNamara, C. (2010) Gender Differences in Willingness to Pay for Urban Public Services. Urban Affairs Review 45(3): 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, J. E. and Lowery, R. C. (2000) A Dynamic Model of State Budget Outcomes Under Divided Partisan Government. Journal of Politics 62: 1035–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Tool, L. J. Jr. and Walker, R. M. (2005) Representative Bureaucracy, Organizational Strategy, and Public Service Performance: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15: 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avellandeda, C. N. (2009) Mayoral Quality and Local Public Finance: Fostering Fiscal Responsibility: International, Federal, and Local Government Perspectives. Public Administration Review 69(3): 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahl, R., Martinez-Vazquez, J. and Wallace, S. (2002) State and Local Government Choices in Fiscal Redistribution. National Tax Journal 55(4): 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrilleaux, C., Holbrook, T. and Langer, L. (2002) Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy. American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, J. E. (1992) The Effects of Changes in Federal Aid on State and Local Government Spending. Publius 22(1): 71–82.Google Scholar
Benton, J. E. (2002a) Counties as Service Delivery Agents: Changing Expectations and Roles. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Benton, J. E. (2002b) County Service Delivery: Does Government Structure Matter? Public Administration Review 62(4): 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, J. E. (2005) An Assessment of Research on American Counties. Public Administration Review 65: 462–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, D. R. (1993) County Governments in an Era of Change . Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Berman, D. R. and Salant, T. J. (1996) The Changing Role of Counties in the Intergovernmental System. In Menzel D. C. (ed.), The American County: Frontiers of Knowledge. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 19–33.Google Scholar
Boris, E. T. and Steuerle, C. E. (2006) Scope and Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector. In Powell W. W. and Steinberg R. (eds.), The Non-Profit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 66–88.Google Scholar
Bradbury, D. M. and Kellough, E. J. (2007) Representative Bureaucracy: Exploring the Potential for Active Representation in Local Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 697–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R. and Golder, M. (2006) Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis. Political Analysis 14: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, K. A. and Haynie, K. L. (1999) Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race. Journal of Politics 61(3): 658–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, N. E. and Schumaker, P. (1987) Gender Differences in Attitudes About the Role of Local Government. Social Science Quarterly 68(1): 138–147.Google Scholar
California Department of Finance (1997) A Performance Review: California’s Child Welfare System, www.dof.ca.gov (accessed 9 February 2013).Google Scholar
California State Association of Counties (2009) Counties in Crisis, www.csac.counties.org (accessed 6 July 2011).Google Scholar
Carroll, S. J. (1994) The Politics of Difference: Women Public Officials as Agents of Change. Stanford Law and Policy Review 5(2): 11–20.Google Scholar
Carroll, S. J. (2003) Women and American Politics: New Questions, New Directions. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. I. (2003) Local Government Autonomy and Fiscal Stress: The Case of California Counties. State & Local Government Review 35(1): 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, S. O., Bae, S. S., Kwon, S. W. and Feiock, R. (2010) County Limits. The American Review of Public Administration 40(1): 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cigler, B. A. (1994) The County-State Connection: A National Study of Associations of Counties. Public Administration Review 54(1): 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. S. and Linzer, D. A. (2012) Should I Use Fixed or Random Effects? Working paper, http://polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/ClarkLinzerREFEMar2012.pdf (accessed 12 May 2013).Google Scholar
Cohen, M. (2001) Realignment Revisited: An Evaluation of the 1991 Experiment in State-County Relations: An LAO Report. Sacramento, CA: Legislative Analyst’s Office.Google Scholar
Courant, P. N., Gramlich, E. M. and Rubinfeld, D. L. (1979) The Stimulative Effects of Intergovernmental Grants: Or Why Money Sticks Where It Hits. In Mieszkowski P. and Oakland W. H. (eds.), Fiscal Federalism and Grants-in-Aid. Washington: Urban Institute, 5–22.Google Scholar
Danielson, C. and Mejia, M. C. (2011) The State-Local Fiscal Relationship in California. In Just the Facts. Public Policy Institute of California, http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/jtf/JTF_StateCountyFiscalJTF.pdf (accessed 27 February 2014).Google Scholar
DeSantis, V. S. and Renner, T. (1994) The Impact of Political Structures on Public Policies in American Counties. Public Administration Review 54(3): 291–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, J. (2002) Representative Bureaucracy in the Federal Executive: Gender and Spending Priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12(3): 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, M. J., Klase, K. A. and Song, S. G. (2003) Managerial Necessity and the Art of Creating Surpluses: The Budget-Execution Process in West Virginia Cities. Public Administration Review 63(4): 484–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncombe, H. S. (1977) Modern County Government. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties.Google Scholar
Dye, T. (1966) Politics, Economics, and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Fabricant, S. (1952) The Trend of Government Activity in the United States Since 1900. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. L. (2011) County Government Choices for Redistributive Services. Urban Affairs Review 47(1): 60–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fosset, J. and Thompson, F. J. (2005) Administrative Responsiveness to the Disadvantaged: The Case of Children’s Health Insurance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, R. L. and Schuhmann, R. A. (2000) Gender and the Role of the City Manager. Social Science Quarterly 81(2): 604–621.Google Scholar
Fry, B. R. and Winters, R. F. (1970) The Politics of Redistribution. The American Political Science Review 64(2): 508–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, J. A. and Turner, R. S. (1995) Gender in Urban Research. Urban Affairs Annual Review 42. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Greene, V., Selden, S. C. and Brewer, G. (2000) Measuring Power and Presence: Bureaucratic Representation in the American States. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3: 379–402.Google Scholar
Grønbjerg, K. A. and Salamon, L. M. (2003) Devolution, Marketization, and the Changing Shape of Government-Nonprofit Relations. In Salamon L. M. (ed.), The State of Nonprofit America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 447–470.Google Scholar
Hsiao, C. (2007) Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, W. S., Palus, C. K. and Bowling, C. J. (2010) A Woman’s Touch? Gendered Management and Performance in State Administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(2): 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1977) Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women. American Journal of Sociology 82: 965–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, H. (1959) The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Keiser, L. R. (1997) The Influence of Women’s Political Power on Bureaucratic Output: The Case of Child Support Enforcement. British Journal of Political Science 27(1): 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J. and Holland, C. A. (2002) Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review 96: 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krane, D., Ebdon, C. and Bartle, J. (2004) Devolution, Fiscal Federalism, and Changing Patterns of Municipal Revenues: The Mismatch Between Theory and Reality. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(4): 513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutner, M., Nachtsheim, C. and Neter, J. (2004) Applied Linear Regression Models, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
Lim, H. H. (2006) Representative Bureaucracy: Rethinking Substantive Effects and Active Representation. Public Administration Review 66(2): 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacManus, S. (1996) County Boards, Partisanship, and Elections. In Menzel D. C. (ed.), The American County: Frontier of Knowledge. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 53–79.Google Scholar
MacManus, S. and Bullock, C. S. III (1995) Electing Women to Local Office. In Garber J. A. and Turner R. S. (eds.), Gender in Urban Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 155–180.Google Scholar
Mandell, B. and Pherwani, S. (2003) Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership Style: A Gender Comparison. Journal of Business and Psychology 17(3): 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, L. M. (1999) The Decline of Welfare in Wisconsin. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9(4): 597–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. and Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2006) Gender, Representative Bureaucracy, and Law Enforcement: The Case of Sexual Assault. Public Administration Review 66(6): 850–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. and O’Toole, L. J. Jr. (2002) Public Management and Organizational Performance: The Impact of Managerial Quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21: 629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzel, D. C. (eds.) (1996) The American County: Frontier of Knowledge. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Misczynski, D. and Mejia, M. C. (2011) The State-Local Fiscal Relationship. In Just the Facts. Public Policy Institute of California. http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/jtf/JTF_StateLocalFiscalJTF.pdf (accessed 27 February 2014).Google Scholar
Moane, K. O. and Wallerstein, M. (2001) Inequity, Social Insurance, and Redistribution. American Political Science Review 95(4): 859–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. R. and Kickham, K. (1999) Changing the Form of County Government: Effects on Revenue and Expenditure Policy. Public Administration Review 59(4): 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musso, J., Graddy, E. and Grizard, J. (2006) State Budgetary Process and Reforms: The California Story. Public Budgeting and Finance 26(4): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, D., Calnan, R., Jacobsen, A. and Wheeler, J. (2012) California Roller Coaster: Income and Housing in Boom and Bust, 1990–2010. Reports from the Population Dynamics Research Group, Sol Price School of Public Policy, http://www.usc.edu/schools/price/research/popdynamics (accessed 3 July 2011).Google Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, S., Theobald, N. A. and Wood, B. D. (2006) Fiscal Federalism and Budgetary Trade-Offs in the American States. Political Research Quarterly 59: 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakerson, R. J. and Parks, R. B. (1989) Local Government Constitutions: A Different View of Metropolitan Governance. The American Review of Public Administration 19(4): 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, V. R. B. and Ostrom, E. (1988) Local Government in the United States. New York: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Pagano, M. A. (1997) City Fiscal Conditions in 1997. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.Google Scholar
Park, K. O. (1996) Determinants of County Government Growth. In Menzel D. C. (ed.), The American County: Frontiers of Knowledge. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 34–50.Google Scholar
Park, S. (2013) Does Gender Matter? The Effect of Gender Representation of Public Bureaucracy on Governmental Performance. The American Review of Public Administration 43(2): 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, P. E. (1981) City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, N. M. and Meyers, M. K. (2004) Linking Passive and Active Representation: The Case of Frontline Workers in Welfare Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(4): 585–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saidel, J. R. and Loscocco, K. (2005) Agency Leaders, Gendered Institutions, and Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review 65(2): 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Germain, M. (1989) Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona Legislature. Social Science Quarterly 70(4): 956–968.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Hot, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, M. and Heldman, C. (2001) Gender Gap or Gender Gaps? New Perspectives on Support for Government Action and Policies. Journal of Politics 63(1): 59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, M. and Park, K. O. (1989) Metropolitan Counties as Service Delivery Agents: The Still Forgotten Governments. Public Administration Review 49(4): 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumaker, P. and Burns, N. E. (1988) Gender Cleavages and the Resolution of Local Policy Issues. American Journal of Political Science 32(4): 1070–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, S. C. (1997) The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Sharkansky, I. and Hofferbert, R. I. (1969) Dimensions of State Politics, Economics, and Public Policy. The American Political Science Review 63(3): 867–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolow, A. D. and Detwiler, P. M. (2001) California. In Krane D., Rigos P. N. and Hill M. B. Jr. (eds.), Home Rule in America: A Fifty-State Handbook. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 58–67.Google Scholar
Sosin, M. R., Smith, S. R., Hilton, T. and Jordan, L. P. (2010) Temporary Crises and Priority Changes: The Case of State Substance Abuse Systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20: 539–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, J., Fording, R. and Schram, A. F. (2011) The Organization of Discipline: From Performance Management to Perversity and Punishment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(suppl 2): i203–i232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilberg, P. and Alexander, L. (2003) The California Budget Crises: Factors Leading to the Current Budget Deficit and a Discussion of Certain Proposed Solutions. National Tax Journal 56(3): 555–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, R. M. (1990) Urban Alternatives. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Stein, R. M. (2003) The Politics of Revenue and Spending Policies. In Pelissero J. P. (ed.), Cities, Politics, and Policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 217–236.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000) Economics of the Public Sector, 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Stivers, C. (2002) Gender Images in Public Administration: Legitimacy and the Administrative State, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streib, G., Svara, J. H., Waugh, W. L. Jr., Klase, K. A., Menzel, D. C., Salant, T. J., Byers, J. and Cigler, B. A. (2007) Conducting Research on Counties in the 21st Century: A New Agenda and Database Considerations. Public Administration Review 67(6): 968–983.Google Scholar
Svara, J. H. (1996) Leadership and Professionalism in County Government. In Menzel D. C. (ed.), The American County: Frontier of Knowledge. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 109–127.Google Scholar
Swers, M. L. (2002) The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. (1991) The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies. The Journal of Politics 53(4): 958–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, F. J. (1976) Minority Groups in Public Bureaucracies: Are Passive and Active Representation Linked? Administration and Society 8: 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins-Hayes, C. (2011) Race, Respect, and Red Tape: Inside the Black Box of Racially Representative Bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(suppl 2): i233–i251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, V. M. (2006) Exploring the Causal Story: Gender, Active Representation, and Bureaucratic Priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17: 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, V. M. and Keiser, L. R. (2006) Linking Passive and Active Representation by Gender: The Case of Child Support Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witco, C. and Newmark, A. J. (2009) The Strange Disappearance of Investment in Human and Physical Capital in the United States. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20: 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar