We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Unspoken Politics: Implicit Attitudes and Political Thinking. By Efrén O. Pérez . Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 228 pp., $29.99 Paper
Review products
Unspoken Politics: Implicit Attitudes and Political Thinking. By Efrén O. Pérez . Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016. 228 pp., $29.99 Paper
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
18 July 2017
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Almond, Gabriel. 1989. A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Campbell, Agnus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G., McGhee, Debbie E., and Schwartz, Jordan L. K.. 1998. “Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74 (6): 1464–80.Google Scholar
Henry, P. J., and Sears, David O.. 2002. “The Symbolic Racism 2000 Scale.” Political Psychology23: 253–83.Google Scholar
McConahay, John B.1986. “Modern Racism, Ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale.” In Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, eds. Dovidio, John F., and Gaertner, Samuel L.. New York: Academic Press, 91–124.Google Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar