Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:13:14.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiation Therapists’ and Diagnostic Radiographers’ participation in continuing professional development and knowledge of Regulatory Body Registration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Ríona Walsh  and
Agnella Craig
Ríona Walsh
Affiliation:
Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity Research Group, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Agnella Craig*
Affiliation:
Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity Research Group, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
*
Correspondence to: Agnella Craig, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Tel: +353 1 896 3926. E-mail: craigag@tcd.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Irish healthcare has seen radical reforms in recent years. Regulatory Body Registration was introduced to improve patient care and regulate professionals. Continuing Professional Development (CPD) is a requirement of registration. Professionals need to keep up-to-date with new techniques and technologies while maintaining their skills.

Purpose

This research assessed the factors affecting CPD participation in Radiation Therapists and Diagnostic Radiographers and their knowledge and attitudes towards Regulatory Body Registration.

Materials and methods

Online surveys were designed and made available on the Irish Institute of Radiography and Radiation Therapy (IIRRT) Website for IIRRT members. The responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and χ2 tests in a statistical computer programme.

Results

Personal development, time, cost and staff shortages negatively affect CPD participation. Reflective practise is not a barrier to CPD. Knowledge and attitudes to Regulatory Body Registration varied.

Conclusion

CPD must be developed in Radiation Therapy and Diagnostic Radiography. Funding, time and increased staffing could result in effective implementation of CPD. Regulatory Body Registration has been communicated but more information regarding the process is required.

Keywords

Continuing Education (CE)Continuing Professional Development (CPD)diagnostic radiographyradiation therapyreflective practice
Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 150 - 160
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Irish Institute of Radiography and Radiation Therapy. About us. 2010.http://www.iirrt.ie/about-us. Accessed on 28th December 2015.Google Scholar
2.CORU, Multi-Profession Health Regulator Ireland. What is CORU? 2013. http://www.coru.ie/en/about_us/what_is_coru. Accessed 28th December 2015.Google Scholar
3.Irish Statute Book, Office of the Attorney General. Health and Social Care Professionals Act 2005. http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2005/act/27/enacted/en/html. Accessed 28th December 2015.Google Scholar
4.CORU, Multi-Profession Health Regulator Ireland. Register opens for radiographers and radiation therapists. 2013. http://www.coru.ie/en/news/details/register_ opens_ for_ radiographers_ and_ radiation_ therapists. Accessed 28th December 2015.Google Scholar
5.CORU, Multi-Profession Health Regulator Ireland. CPD—When to engage. 2013. http://www.coru.ie/en/education/cpd_when_to_engage. Accessed 29th December 2015.Google Scholar
6.Health and Social Care Professionals Council. Framwork for continuing professional development standard and requirements. http://coru.ie/uploads/documents/Final_CPD_framework_document_Updates_02.11.15_GR.pdf. Accessed 28th December 2015.Google Scholar
7.Alsop, A. Continuing Professional Development: A Guide for Therapists. London: Blackwell Science Ltd, 2008.Google Scholar
8.Henwood, S M, Yielder, J, Flinton, D. Radiographers attitudes to mandatory CPD: a comparative study in the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Radiography 2004; 10 (4): 251–258.Google Scholar
9.Henwood, S, Yielder, J, Flinton, D. Exploring radiographers’ attitudes to mandatory CPD in the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Radiographer 2010; 57 (1): 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Haywood, H, Pain, H, Ryan, S, et al. Engagement with continuing professional development: development of a service model. J Allied Health 2012; 41 (2): 83–89.Google Scholar
11.Power, A, Grammatiki, A, Bates, I, et al. Factors affecting the views and attitudes of Scottish pharmacists to continuing professional development. Int J Pharm Pract 2011; 19 (6): 424–430.Google Scholar
12.Donyai, P, Herbert, R Z, Denicolo, P M, et al. British pharmacy professionals’ beliefs and participation in continuing professional development: a review of the literature. Int J Pharm Pract 2011; 19 (5): 290–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Bacal, R. What is the point of performance appraisal. 2013. http://work911.com/articles/pointperformance.htm. Accessed 28th December 2015.Google Scholar
14.Nolan, M, Owens, R G, Nolan, J. Continuing professional education: identifying the characteristics of an effective system. J Adv Nurs 1995; 21 (3): 551–560.Google Scholar
15.French, H P, Dowds, J. An overview of continuing professional development in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 2008; 94 (3): 190–197.Google Scholar
16.Sturrock, J B, Lennie, S C. Compulsory continuing professional development: a questionnaire-based survey of the UK dietetic profession. J Hum Nutr Diet 2009; 22 (1): 12–20.Google Scholar
17.Castillo, J, Caruana, C J. Maltese radiographers’ attitudes towards continuing professional development: an initial study using concept maps. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2013; 45 (1): 37–46.Google Scholar
18.Friedman, A, Phillips, M.. Leaping the CPD hurdle: a study of the barriers and drivers to participation in Continuing Professional Development. 2001. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001892.htm. Accessed 28th December 2015.Google Scholar
19.Penny, L. Continuing professional development (CPD): quantifying the views of occupational therapist managers in an Irish context, thesis, AOTI, Dublin, Ireland, 2005.Google Scholar
20.Brown, C A, Belfield, C R, Field, S J. Cost effectiveness of continuing professional development in health care: a critical review of the evidence. BMJ 2002; 324 (7338): 652–655.Google Scholar
21.Hopcraft, M S, Manton, D J, Chong, P L, et al. Participation in continuing professional development by dental practitioners in Victoria, Australia in 2007. Eur J Dent Educ 2010; 14 (4): 227–234.Google Scholar
22.Barnes, E, Bullock, A D, Bailey, S E, et al. A review of continuing professional development for dentists in Europe. Eur J Dent Educ 2012; 16 (3): 166–178.Google Scholar
23.Marshall, G, Punys, V, Sykes, A. The continuous professional development (CPD) requirements of radiographers in Europe: an initial survey. Radiography 2008; 14 (4): 332–342.Google Scholar
24. H.a.C.P. Council. Health and care professional council aims and vision. 2013. http://www.hpc-uk.org/aboutus/aimsandvision/. Accessed 28th December 2015.Google Scholar