Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:02:44.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancing conceptual knowledge: an approach to using Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training in the classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2016

D. Montgomerie*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
J. P. Kane
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
A. Leong
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
B. Mudie
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
*
Correspondence to: Darien Montgomerie, Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Otago, Wellington, P.O. Box 7343, Wellington South 6242, New Zealand. Tel: 64 4 385 5475. Fax: 64 4 385 5375. E-mail: darien.montgomerie@otago.ac.nz

Abstract

This report discusses the approach to teaching undergraduate radiation therapy students in New Zealand using the Virtual Environment for the Radiotherapy Training (VERT) system. In conjunction with VERT being used to teach clinical skills, integration of conceptual knowledge occurs across all 3 years of the programme; this report gives examples of how this is achieved in practice.

Type
Educational Note
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Vertual Ltd. http://www.vertual.co.uk/. Accessed on 23 February 2016.Google Scholar
2.James, S, Dumbleton, C. An evaluation of the utilisation of the Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy Training (VERT) in clinical radiotherapy centres across the UK. Radiography 2013; 19 (2): 142150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Flinton, D. Competency based assessment using a Virtual Environment for Radiotherapy. Procedia Comput Sci 2013; 25: 399401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Boejen, A, Grau, C. Virtual reality in radiation therapy training. Surg Oncol 2011; 20 (3): 185188.Google Scholar
5.Nisbet, H, Matthews, S. The educational theory underpinning a clinical workbook for VERT. Radiography 2011; 17 (1): 7275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Coffey, M, Mullaney, L, Bojen, A, Vaandering, A, Vandevelde, G. Recommended ESTRO Core Curriculum for RTTs (Radiation TherapisTs), 3rd edition, Brussels. The European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2011. http://www.estro.org/binaries/content/assets/estro/school/european-curricula/recommended_core_curriculum-radiationtherapists---3rd-edition-2011.pdf. Accessed on 9th December 2015.Google Scholar
7.Kane, J P. The impact of the VERT virtual reality system on teaching and learning associated with radiation therapy planning skills in the second year of the Bachelor of Radiation Therapy, 2014. https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/5027. Accessed on 14th December 2015.Google Scholar
8.Leong, A G. Development and implementation of a radiation treatment planning teaching module utilising an immersive 3D simulation system. Master of Health Sciences, Dissertation. Wellington, New Zealand: University of Otago, 2015.Google Scholar