Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:00:55.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Promoting radiation therapy research: understanding perspectives, transforming culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2012

A. Turner ,
L. D'Alimonte  and
M. Fitch
A. Turner*
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Therapy, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
L. D'Alimonte
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Therapy, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M. Fitch
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Correspondence to: Angela Turner, Department of Radiation Therapy, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Phone: 416-480-6100 , Fax: 416-480-4672. E-mail: Angela.Turner@sunnybrook.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purpose: To identify the challenges and opportunities that prevent Radiation Therapist (RT) led research at our clinic. Insight gained from this process may lead to strategies which can encourage and support RT research. In this way we can ensure evidence-based practises are promoted by RTs as well as enhancing the professional profile of RTs in the research domain.

Methods: A qualitative approach was chosen for this study. Five focus group sessions were conducted to discuss issues related to research participation within our department. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis occurred whereby overarching themes were identified, content categories were developed, and summaries were written from these categories. Pre-dominant themes were later presented to the entire radiation therapy department for member checking. Answers to a series of questions were obtained anonymously through the use of iClickersTM (MacMillan MPS, Gordonsville, VA). Further, an open group discussion followed focusing on three key areas (departmental, personal and professional). Initiatives or opportunities that could be implemented to increase research activities were discussed and recorded by a designated note-taker.

Results: Nineteen RTs participated in five focus group sessions. The over-arching themes identified were definition of research, involvement in research and the barriers to conducting research. Member checking confirmed these major themes.

Conclusion: We identified the challenges faced by RTs in the areas of research and development at our centre. This information has given us a greater understanding of the culture of our department and the attitudes to research activities from all groups within it. We aim to use these insights to set-up a framework of support to facilitate increased initiatives. Alongside this support RTs will have a clear understanding of their responsibilities to the organisation that facilitates their research. We anticipate these developments will lead to greater job satisfaction for RTs, increased staff morale and most importantly, the improvement of the overall quality of services we deliver to our patients.

Keywords

researchradiation therapyculture transformationbarriersopportunities
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 92 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cochrane, A. Effectiveness and Efficiency Random Reflections on the Health Service. Nuffield provincial Hospitals Trust. Leeds. 1972.Google Scholar
Baird, M. Evolution of a degree program: The Australian example. Radiology Technology. 1992; 62: 404–409.Google Scholar
Gambling, T, Brown, P, and Hogg, P. Research in our Practice-a requirement not an option: discussion paper. Radiography. 2003; 9: 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, P, Wright, C, Shelley, S, Williams, P. The Society of Radiographers Research Strategy. Radiography. 2004; 10: 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottenbacher, K. Occupational therapy curricula and practice-skills based or knowledge based? Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1990; 10: 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACORN Research Radiographer Working Party. Gap Analysis of role definition and training needs for therapeutic research radiographers in the UK. British Journal of Radiology, September 2007. 693–701Google Scholar
Catton, J, Catton, P, and Davey, C. Research and the Medical Radiation Technologists: What are we waiting for? The Canadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology. 1999; 30(1): 35–44.Google Scholar
Higgins, J and Davey, C. Radiation Therapists’ perceived values in conducting research: Related challenges and opportunities. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 2009; 40: 75–84.Google Scholar
Wrightson, P, Cross, A, Vinette, E.M. Integrating research into the Culture of Allied Healthcare Professions. Journal of Allied Health. Summer 2004; 33: 2. 132–138Google Scholar
Bass, B and Avolio, BJ. Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture. PAQ Spring 1993. 113–121Google Scholar
Lee, NJ. Gambling, TG. and Hogg, P. Leadership in Research. Radiography. 2004; 10: 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. Find and Deliver: research and practice in therapeutic radiography. Radiography. 2000; 6: 225–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scutter, S. and Halkett, G. Research Attitudes and Experiences of Radiation Therapists. The Radiographer 2003; 50: 69–71.Google Scholar
Pravikoff, DS., Tanner, AB and Pierce, ST.Readiness of US Nurses for Evidence Based Practice. American Journal of Nursing 2005; 105(9): 40–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, R, & Fader, K. Evidence based decision making as a tool for continuous professional development in the Medical radiation technologies. The Canadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology. Spring 2007; 38(1): 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, J. Zadnik, MG, Radloff, A. University and workplace cultures; their impact on the development of lifelong learners. Radiography 2003; 9: 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harnett, N, Palmer, C, Bolderston, A, and Catton, P. The scholarly radiation therapist. Part One: charting the territory. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice. 2008; 7: 99–104.Google Scholar