Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:29:10.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implicit Theories of Relationships and Conflict Communication Patterns in Romantic Relationships: A Dyadic Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2018

Taylor Dovala ,
Matt Hawrilenko  and
James V. Cordova
Taylor Dovala*
Affiliation:
Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
Matt Hawrilenko
Affiliation:
Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
James V. Cordova
Affiliation:
Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Taylor Dovala, Department of Psychology, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester MA 01610, USA. Email: tdovala@clarku.edu
Get access

Abstract

The present study examined the relationship between dyadic interaction patterns and implicit theories of relationships (ITRs; deeply held beliefs about the nature of relationships) using a sample of N = 104 couples. We hypothesised that destiny beliefs would predict greater avoidance in conflict interactions, while growth beliefs would predict more constructive communication. Surprisingly, the results of the current study challenge the existing literature by indicating that neither destiny nor growth beliefs predict constructive communication or mutual avoidance for the couple. Further, while destiny beliefs were related to increased withdrawal in a demand-withdraw pattern, growth beliefs related to both demand and withdraw in a demand-withdraw pattern. These findings suggest that assessing the relationship between ITRs and communication patterns at the couple level introduces complexity that is underexplored in the current literature on implicit theories of relationships.

Keywords

couplesimplicit theories of relationshipsconflict communicationdyadic analysisActor-Partner Interdependence ModelAPIM
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Relationships Research , Volume 9 , 2018 , e11
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Arbuckle, J.L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 user's guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation.Google Scholar
Baucom, B.R., McFarland, P.T., & Christensen, A. (2010). Gender, topic, and time in observed demand–withdraw interaction in cross- and same-sex couples. Journal Of Family Psychology, 24, 233–242. https://doi.org/:10.1037/a0019717Google Scholar
Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., & Weintraub, J.K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267Google Scholar
Christensen, A. (1987). Detection of conflict patterns in couples. In Hahlweg, K., Goldstein, M.J., Hahlweg, K., & Goldstein, M.J. (Eds.), Understanding major mental disorder: The contribution of family interaction research (pp. 250–265). New York, NY: Family Process Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, A. (1988). Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. In Noller, P., Fitzpatrick, M.A., Noller, P., & Fitzpatrick, M.A. (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31–52). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Christensen, A., & Shenk, J.L. (1991). Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 458. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.3.458Google Scholar
Corcoran, K.O., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2000). Adult attachment, self-efficacy, perspective taking, and conflict resolution. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb01931.xGoogle Scholar
Cordova, J.V., & Scott, R.L. (2001). Intimacy: A behavioral interpretation. The Behavior Analyst, 24, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392020Google Scholar
Crenshaw, A.O., Christensen, A., Baucom, D.H., Epstein, N.B., & Baucom, B.R.W. (2017). Revised scoring and improved reliability for the Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 29, 913–925. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000385Google Scholar
Crohan, S.E. (1996). Marital quality and conflict across the transition to parenthood in African American and White couples. Journal of Marriage and The Family, 58, 933–944. https://doi.org/10.2307/353981Google Scholar
Dweck, C.S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1Google Scholar
Eidelson, R.J., & Epstein, N. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 715–720. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.50.5.715Google Scholar
Franiuk, R., Cohen, D., & Pomerantz, E.M. (2002). Implicit theories of relationships: Implications for relationship satisfaction and longevity. Personal Relationships, 9, 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.09401Google Scholar
Franiuk, R., Pomerantz, E.M., & Cohen, D. (2004). The causal role of theories of relationships: Consequences for satisfaction and cognitive strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1494–1507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264894Google Scholar
Gottman, J.M., & Levenson, R.W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–233.Google Scholar
Heavey, C.L., Larson, B.M., Zumtobel, D.C., & Christensen, A. (1996). The Communication Patterns Questionnaire: The reliability and validity of a constructive communication subscale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 796–800. https://doi.org/10.2307/353737Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392–402. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.392Google Scholar
Holley, S.R., Sturm, V.E., & Levenson, R.W. (2010). Exploring the basis for gender differences in the demand-withdraw pattern. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918361003712145Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118Google Scholar
Kammrath, L.K., & Dweck, C. (2006). Voicing conflict: Preferred conflict strategies among incremental and entity theorists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1497–1508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291476Google Scholar
Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and The Arts, 8, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034898Google Scholar
Kelly, G.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Kenny, D.A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00202.xGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Knee, C.R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.360Google Scholar
Knee, C.R., & Bush, A.L. (2008). Relationship beliefs and their role in romantic relationship initiation. In Sprecher, S., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 471–485). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Knee, C.R., Nanayakkara, A., Vietor, N.A., Neighbors, C., & Patrick, H. (2001). Implicit theories of relationships: Who cares if romantic partners are less than ideal?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 808–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201277004Google Scholar
Knee, C.R., Patrick, H., & Lonsbary, C. (2003). Implicit theories of relationships: Orientations toward evaluation and cultivation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_3Google Scholar
Knee, C.R., Patrick, H., Vietor, N.A., & Neighbors, C. (2004). Implicit theories of relationships: Moderators of the link between conflict and commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 617–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262853Google Scholar
Knee, C., & Petty, K. (2013). Implicit theories of relationships: Destiny and growth beliefs. In Simpson, J.A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbooks of close relationships (pp. 183–198). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.013.0009Google Scholar
Kurdek, L.A. (2005). What do we know about gay and lesbian couples? Current Directions In Psychological Science, 14, 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00375.xGoogle Scholar
Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D.A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607099Google Scholar
Lee, Y., Heeter, C., Magerko, B., & Medler, B. (2012). Gaming mindsets: Implicit theories in serious game learning. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0328Google Scholar
Noller, P., & White, A. (1990). The validity of the Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 478–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.2.4.478Google Scholar
Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96, 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.341Google Scholar
Rudolph, K.D. (2010). Implicit theories of peer relationships. Social Development, 19, 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00534.xGoogle Scholar
Schrodt, P., Witt, P.L., & Shimkowski, J.R. (2014). A meta-analytical review of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction and its associations with individual, relational, and communicative outcomes. Communication Monographs, 81, 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.813632Google Scholar
Schumann, K., Zaki, J., & Dweck, C.S. (2014). Addressing the empathy deficit: Beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036738Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Metts, S. (1989). Development of the ‘Romantic Beliefs Scale’ and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407589064001Google Scholar
Sullaway, M., & Christensen, A. (1983). Assessment of dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. Journal of Marriage and The Family, 45, 653–660. https://doi.org/10.2307/351670Google Scholar
Thomsen, D.G., & Gilbert, D.G. (1998). Factors characterizing marital conflict states and traits: Physiological, affective, behavioral and neurotic variable contributions to marital conflict and satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 833–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00064-6Google Scholar
Weston, R., & Gore, P.J. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345Google Scholar
Yeager, D.S., & Dweck, C.S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805Google Scholar