Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:26:03.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Opposite-Sex Relationship Questionnaire for Male Adolescents: Development and Psychometric Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2018

Nasim Bahrami ,
Masoumeh Sibmar ,
AbouAli Vedadhir ,
Hamid Alavi Majd  and
Averil Parker
Nasim Bahrami
Affiliation:
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
Masoumeh Sibmar*
Affiliation:
Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
AbouAli Vedadhir
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Fertility and Reproduction Studies Group, Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Hamid Alavi Majd
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Averil Parker
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Concordia University, Quebec, Canada
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Masoumeh Simbar, Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email: msimbar@sbmu.ac.ir
Get access

Abstract

We used a mixed-methods, sequential, exploratory design. In the qualitative phase, an in-depth interview approach was used to identify the properties and dimensions to be included in the Opposite-Sex Relationship Questionnaire for Male Adolescents (OSRQMA). In the quantitative phase, the psychometric properties of the OSRQMA were evaluated according to the concepts of face, content, and construct validity. Reliability and stability were assessed with Cronbach's alpha (α) and McDonald's coefficient omega (ω), and with test–retest analysis respectively. A preliminary questionnaire was developed, including 61 items that emerged from the qualitative phase of the study. Based on the impact scores for face validity, and the cutoff points for the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI), the preliminary questionnaire was reduced to 53 items. The Kaiser criteria (eigenvalues >1) and scree plot tests demonstrated that 22 items forming four factors, which were labelled ‘innate predilection’, ‘abstinence’, ‘family attitudes’, and ‘peer pressure’, were optimum, accounting for an estimated 53.449% of the variance. These scales had acceptable levels of internal consistency (α = .854, ω = 0.977) and stability (r = .892, p < .001).

Keywords

reliabilityvalidityopposite-sexrelationshipadolescents
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Relationships Research , Volume 9 , 2018 , e3
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baheiraei, A., Hamzehgardeshi, Z., Mohammadi, M.R., & Nedjat, S. (2011). Violence related behaviors and self-inflicted injuries among 15–18 year old Iranian adolscents. Indian Pediatrics, 48, 984–985.Google Scholar
Bahrami, N., Sibmar, M., Bukowski, W.M., Vedadhir, A., & Panarello, B. (2016). Factors that promote and impede other-sex friendships: A qualitative study of Iranian adolescent girls. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. Advance online publication. doi:10.1515/ijamh-2016–0067 Google Scholar
Bahrami, N., Simbar, M., & Soleimani, M.A. (2013). Sexual health challenges of adolescents in Iran: A review article. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, 10, 1–16.Google Scholar
Bahrami, N., Simbar, M., Vedadhir, A., Bukowski, W.M., & Panarello, B. (2016). Male Iranian adolescent's reasons for having an other-gender friend. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 29, ii. doi:10.1515/ijamh-2015–0086 Google Scholar
Bahrami, N., Soleimani, M.A., Chan, Y.H., Ghojazadeh, M., & Mirmiran, P. (2014). Menarche age in Iran: A meta-analysis. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 19, 444–450.Google Scholar
Brunner, M., Nagy, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80, 796–846.Google Scholar
Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, J.R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent romantic relationships. In Florsheim, P. (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 23–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Chen, X., & Graham, S. (2012). Close relationships and attributions for peer victimization among late adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1547–1556.Google Scholar
Colton, D., & Covert, R.W. (2007). Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation. Jossey-Bass, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ellis, W.E., Chung-Hall, J., & Dumas, T.M. (2013). The role of peer group aggression in predicting adolescent dating violence and relationship quality. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 487–499. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9797-0 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farahani, F.K.A., Cleland, J., & Mehryar, A.H. (2011). Associations between family factors and premarital heterosexual relationships among female college students in Tehran. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 37, 30–39.Google Scholar
Feiring, C. (1996). Concepts of romance in 15-year-old adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 181–200.Google Scholar
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (2009). Methods and measures: The network of relationships inventory: Behavioral systems version. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 470–478.Google Scholar
Furman, W., & Collins, W.A. (2009). Adolescent romantic relationships and experiences. In Rubin, K.H., Bukowski, W.M., & Laursen, B. (Eds.), Social, emotional, and personality development in context. Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 341–360). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Furman, W., & Shaffer, L. (2003). The role of romantic relationships in adolescent development. In Florsheim, P. (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Giordano, P.C. (2003). Relationships in adolescence. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 257–281.Google Scholar
Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (1998). Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school: An attributional analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34, 587–599.Google Scholar
Graneheim, U.H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.Google Scholar
Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jay Lynn, S., Surya Das, L., Hallquist, M.N., & Williams, J.C. (2006). Mindfulness, acceptance, and hypnosis: Cognitive and clinical perspectives. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54, 143–166.Google Scholar
Jorritsma, W., de Vries, G.E., Dijkstra, P.U., Geertzen, J.H., & Reneman, M.F. (2012). Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Neck Disability Index: Validity of Dutch language versions. European Spine Journal, 21, 93–100.Google Scholar
Joyner, K., & Kao, G. (2005). Interracial relationships and the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 70, 563–581.Google Scholar
Ladd, G.W., Ettekal, I., Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., Rudolph, K.D., & Andrews, R.K. (2014). Relations among chronic peer group rejection, maladaptive behavioral dispositions, and early adolescents’ peer perceptions. Child Development, 85, 971–988. doi:10.1111/cdev.12214 Google Scholar
Lawshe, C. (1975). A qualitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 25, 563–575.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
Munro, B.H. (2005). Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelpia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Parvizi, S., & Ahmadi, F. (2006). Peer group and adolescent health: A qualitative study. Feiz Journal, 10, 46–52.Google Scholar
Polit-O'Hara, D., & Beck, C.T. (2006). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization (vol. 1). Philadelphia, PA:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Poulin, F., & Chan, A. (2010). Friendship stability and change in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Review, 30, 257–272.Google Scholar
Ranjbar, H., Haghdoost, A.-A., Salsali, M., Khoshdel, A., Soleimani, M., & Bahrami, N. (2012). Sampling in qualitative research: A guide for beginning. HBI_Journals, 10, 238–250.Google Scholar
Saggino, A., & Kline, P. (1996). Item factor analysis of the Italian version of the Death Anxiety Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52, 329–333.Google Scholar
Sharif Nia, H., Haghdoost, A.A., Ebadi, A., Soleimani, M.A., Yaghoobzadeh, A., Abbaszadeh, A., . . . Moulookzadeh, S. (2015). Psychometric properties of the King Spiritual Intelligence Questionnaire (KSIQ) in physical veterans of Iran-Iraq warfare. Journal of Military Medicine, 17, 145–153.Google Scholar
Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's alpha. Psychometrika, 74 (1), 107–120.Google Scholar
Soleimani, M.A., Pahlevan Sharif, S., Allen, K.A., Yaghoobzadeh, A., Sharif Nia, H., & Gorgulu, O. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Spiritual Well-Being Scale in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Journal of Religion and Health, 56, 1981–1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soleimani, M.A., Yaghoobzadeh, A., Bahrami, N., Sharif, S.P., & Sharif Nia, H. (2016). Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Templer's Death Anxiety Scale in cancer patients. Death Studies, 40, 547–557. doi:10.1080/07481187.2016.1187688 Google Scholar
Suhr, D. (2003). Reliability, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for the scale of athletic priorities. Diambil pada tanggal, 2, 274–228.Google Scholar
Waltz, C.F., & Bausell, B.R. (1981). Nursing research: Design statistics and computer analysis: Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.Google Scholar