Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T09:10:36.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Avoidant Attachment and the Processing of Emotion Information: Selective Attention or Cognitive Avoidance?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2015

Panoraia Andriopoulos  and
Konstantinos Kafetsios
Panoraia Andriopoulos*
Affiliation:
Southampton Solent University, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
Konstantinos Kafetsios
Affiliation:
University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Panoraia Andriopoulos, Psychology Department, School of Health, Exercise and Social Science, Southampton Solent University, East Park Terrace, Southampton, Hampshire SO14 0YN, UK. Email: panoraia.andriopoulou@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The present study investigated avoidant attachment orientation differences in emotion processing biases under different conditions of attachment schema activation (subliminal, supraliminal or no-activation). After completing a dimensional assessment of adult attachment, 97 participants were randomly assigned to one of the three activating conditions and subsequently performed an Emotional Stroop Task including attachment and emotion positive and negative words. Consistently, in the supraliminal activation condition, avoidant participants demonstrated higher interference of attachment-related and emotional stimuli compared to the no-activation condition; they focused on the task-relevant processes (colour naming), ignoring the semantic meaning of the words (lower interference). The results of the present study suggest that avoidant individuals use both pre-emptive and post-emptive strategies under different activating conditions in the processing of emotion information. The results also highlight interpretation of latencies in the Emotional Stroop Task for avoidant participants.

Keywords

attachment systemprimingactivationavoidant attachmentinformation processingEmotional Stroop
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Relationships Research , Volume 6 , 2015 , e6
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avero, P., Corace, K.M., Endler, N.S., & Calvo, M.G. (2003). Coping styles and threat processing. Personality and Ιndividual Differences, 35, 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, M.W., Fehr, B., Keedian, E., & Seidel, M. (1993). An exploration of the relational schemas underlying attachment styles: Self-report and lexical decision approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 746–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, M.W., Keelan, J.P., Fehr, B., Enns, V., & Koh-Rangarajoo, E. (1996). Social-cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models: Availability and accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, G. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A.T., & Clark, D.A. (1997). An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A.T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R.L. (1986). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bertels, J., Kolinsky, R., Pietrons, E., & Morais, J. (2011). Long-lasting attentional influence of negative and taboo words in an auditory variant of the emotional Stroop task. Emotion, 11, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanno, G.A., Davis, P.J., Singer, J.L., & Schwartz, G.E. (1991). The repressor personality and avoidant information processing: A dichotic listening study. Journal of Research in Personalily, 25, 386–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, G. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dawkins, K., & Furnham, A. (1989). The colour naming of emotional words. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derakshan, N., Eysenck, M.W., & Myers, L.B. (2007). Emotional information processing in repressors: The vigilance–avoidance theory. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1585–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ruiter, C., & Brosschot, J.F. (1994). The emotional Stroop effect in anxiety: Attentional bias or cognitive avoidance? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 315–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewitte, M. (2011). Adult attachment and attentional inhibition of interpersonal stimuli. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 612–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewitte, M., & De Houwer, J. (2008). Adult attachment and attention to positive and negative emotional face expressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 498–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewitte, M., De Houwer, J., Koster, E.H.W., & Buysse, A. (2007). What's in a name? Attachment-related attentional bias. Emotion, 33, 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewitte, M., Koster, E.H.W., De Houwer, J., & Buysse, A. (2007). Attentive processing of threat and adult attachment: A dot-probe study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1307–1317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, L.M., Hicks, A.M., & Otter-Henderson, K. (2006). Physiological evidence for repressive coping among avoidantly attached adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan-Johnson, C.C., & Kopell, B.S. (1981). The Stroop effect: Brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science, 214, 938–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dykas, M.J., & Cassidy, J. (2011). Attachment and the processing of social information across the life span: Theory and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 19–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelstein, R.S. (2006). Attachment and emotional memory: Investigating the source and extent of avoidant memory deficits. Emotion, 6, 340–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, R.S., & Gillath, O. (2008). Avoiding interference: Adult attachment and emotional processing biases. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, K.I., & Forster, J.C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraley, R.C., Garner, J.P., & Shaver, P.R. (2000). Adult attachment and the defensive regulation of attention and memory: Examining the role of preemptive and postemptive defensive processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 816–826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraley, R.C., & Shaver, P.R. (1997). Adult attachment and the suppression of unwanted thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraley, R.C., Waller, N.G., & Brennan, K.A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frings, C., Englert, J., Wentura, D., & Bermeitinger, C. (2010). Decomposing the emotional Stroop effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 42–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genov, A., Shay, I., & Boone, R.T. (2002). Genov modified Stroop task (GMST; computer software and manual). Retrieved September 7, 2008, from http://facpub.stjohns.edu/~booner/GMSTsite/index.htm Google Scholar
Gillath, O., Mikulincer, M., Fitzsimons, G.M., Shaver, P.R., Schachner, D.A., & Bargh, J.A. (2006). Automatic activation of attachment-related goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1375–1388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Revelle, W., & Gotlib, I.H. (2000). Stroop interference following mood induction: Emotionality, mood congruence, and concern relevance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, J.J., & John, O.P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P.R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kafetsios, K., Andriopoulos, P., & Papachiou, A. (2014). Relationship status moderates avoidant attachment differences in positive emotion decoding accuracy. Personal Relationships, 21, 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karademas, E.C., Kafetsios, K., & Sideridis, G.D. (2007). Optimism, self-efficacy and information processing of threat-and well-being-related stimuli. Stress and Health, 23, 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsh, S.J., & Cassidy, J. (1997). Preschoolers’ attention to and memory for attachment-relevant information. Child Development, 68, 1143–1153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirsh, S.J., Olczak, P.V., & Mounts, J.R. (2005). Violent video games induce an affect processing bias. Media Psychology, 7, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobak, K.R., Holland, E.C., Rayanne, F-G., Fleming, W.S., & Gamble, W. (1993). Attachment and emotion regulation during mother-teen problem solving: A control theory analysis. Child Development, 61, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyrios, M., & Iob, M.A. (1998). Automatic and strategic processing in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Attentional bias, cognitive avoidance or more complex phenomena? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 12, 271–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, C.M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, C. & Mathews, A.M. (1991). Cognitive-experimental approaches to the emotional disorders. In Martin, P.R. (Ed.), Handbook of behavior therapy and psychological science: An integrative approach (pp. 116–150). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, F.P., & Sharma, D. (2004). Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: The role of fast and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 382.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Arad, D. (1999). Attachment working models and cognitive openness in close relationships: A test of chronic and temporary accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 710–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G., Woddis, D., & Nachmias, G. (2000). Stress and accessibility of proximity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 509–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikulincer, M., Dolev, T., & Shaver, P.R. (2004). Attachment-related strategies during thought suppression: Ironic rebounds and vulnerable self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Shaver, P.R. (2002). Activation of the attachment system in adulthood: Threat-related primes increase the accessibility of mental representations of attachment figures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 881–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 35, pp. 53–152). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, A., & Carnelley, K.B. (2003). Attachment style differences in the processing of attachment-relevant information: Primed style effects on recall, interpersonal expectations, and affect. Personal Relationships, 10, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, R.M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnby-Borgström, M., & Jönsson, P. (2004). Dismissing-avoidant pattern of attachment and mimicry reactions at different levels of information processing. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsagarakis, M., Kafetsios, K., & Stalikas, A. (2007). Factor structure, validity, and reliability of the Greek version of the Revised Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR-R) measure of adult attachment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrtička, P., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2012). Influence of adult attachment style on the perception of social and non-social emotional scenes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 530–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, A.J., Sayette, M.A., Franken, I.H., & Schwartz, J.E. (2005). Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 715–732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinberger, D.A., Schwartz, G.E., & Davidson, R.J. (1979). Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: Psychometric patterns and behavioral and physiological responses to stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed