Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-wdhn8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-16T00:49:37.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

(1)A Handbook of antique Prose-Rhythm. Vol. I., pp. 228. 1918. (2) De Numero Oratorio Latino Commentatio. pp. 52. 1919. By A. W. De Groot, Litt.D., Conservator of the Library of the University of Groningen. Groningen, The Hague: J. B. Wolters.

Review products

(1)A Handbook of antique Prose-Rhythm. Vol. I., pp. 228. 1918. (2) De Numero Oratorio Latino Commentatio. pp. 52. 1919. By A. W. De Groot, Litt.D., Conservator of the Library of the University of Groningen. Groningen, The Hague: J. B. Wolters.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

E. A. S.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Recent Publications
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 7 , November 1918 , pp. 299 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © E. A. S. 1918. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 299 note 1 Der Constructive Rhythmus in Ciceros Reden (Supplementband xiii., Heft I, of Philologus, 1914), reviewed in The Year's Work for 1914, pp. 61–65. This work is not mentioned in the bibliography of the Handbook (p. 217), but it is quoted in De Num. Orat. p. 30.

page 300 note 1 On p. 18 we read ‘On practical grounds I took 7, and added—the reason will be explained later on—an eighth.’ The reference may be to p. 148.

page 300 note 2 On p. 14 of the Handbook ἀτεΧνὦς is scanned as ; but c.f. p. 154. In my count I treated a tribrach yielding one instance of a pyrrhic; but apparently De Groot treats it as yielding two pyrrhics: e.g. τὰ μετά=τὰ με- and μετά (ω and υυ). Strictly speaking the tribrach has no place at all in the list of feet given on p. 2.