Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:21:16.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Augustus, Domitian and the So-called Horologium Augusti

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2010

Peter Heslin
Affiliation:
Durham University, p.j.heslin@durham.ac.uk

Extract

Buchner's reconstruction of the Horologium Augusti continues to be influential, despite fatal flaws demonstrated by Rodríguez-Almeida and Schütz; so we begin by reviewing the state of the evidence. There is no credible indication that Augustus or his successors built an extensive sundial, so we must conclude with Schütz that what Pliny described and what the excavations of the German Archaeological Institute (DAI) uncovered was a solar meridian line. We then proceed to discuss its significance in the context of the Augustan building programme. Since the DAI in fact discovered a Flavian reconstruction, the final question to be addressed is what purpose it served Domitian to rebuild a largely symbolic Augustan instrument that had grown inaccurate over time.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Peter Heslin 2007. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)