Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:48:50.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and Meaning in Tacitus’ Annals

Review products

ANTHONY J.WOODMAN (ED.), THE ANNALS OF TACITUS: BOOK 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Pp. xxi + 349. isbn9781108419611. £84.99.
ANTHONY J.WOODMAN (ED.), THE ANNALS OF TACITUS: BOOKS 5 AND 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Pp. xxi + 325. isbn9781107152700. £103.99.
RHIANNONASH (ED.), TACITUS: ANNALS BOOK XV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Pp. xv + 368. isbn9780521269391. £24.99.

Show more reviewed productsShow more reviewed products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2021

Katherine Clarke
Katherine Clarke*
Affiliation:
St Hilda's College, Oxford
*
katherine.clarke@classics.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘Verbal disharmonies reflect the complexities of history and all that is ambiguous in the behaviour of men. … His theme was savage and sinister, with no place for hope, ease or happiness. … Tacitus took possession of the Latin language, bent it to his will, and pushed to the utter limits all that it knew or promised of energy, gravity, and magnificence.’

(R. Syme, Tacitus, 1958: 347–8, 358)

Sir Ronald Syme, whose appreciation of the greatest of Roman historians remains vivid, insightful and compelling more than sixty years after the publication of his monumental work, thus highlighted one of the most challenging and enriching aspects of our own engagement with this author—the simultaneous difficulty and resonance of his language. Any reader will recognise Syme's characterisation of a Latin language bent to Tacitus’ will. Difficult for students, testing for experienced academics, Tacitus’ Latin defies the morphology of the primer and the syntax of the grammar. Everything we learned from Cicero about Latin forms, balanced clauses, rhetorical crescendos and word-order is thrown by Tacitus into disarray. His use of Latin jars and disrupts. Even the call for variatio is subverted, with a conservative and limited vocabulary in play, involving frequent repetition of key abstract terms, but conversely little pattern or regularity in the syntax of sentences. The ‘verbal disharmonies’ both challenge the reader and enrich the meaning. The highly charged nature of Tacitus’ Latin and its capacity, in his ‘possession’, to encapsulate the political complexities of the period is well established. No word is casually or carelessly chosen; phrasing carries resonance; echoes are significant.

Type
Review Articles
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 111 , November 2021 , pp. 215 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I should like to thank the three anonymous readers for their constructive criticisms and invaluable suggestions, as well as Myles Lavan for his generous help, patience and eagle-eyed attention to detail throughout the process of revision and publication. All remaining errors remain, of course, my own responsibility.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ash, R. 2002: ‘Between Scylla and Charybdis? Historiographical Commentaries on Latin Historians’, in Gibson and Kraus 2002, 269–94.Google Scholar
Ash, R. 2006: ‘Following in the footsteps of Lucullus. Tacitus’ characterisation of Corbulo’, Arethusa 39, 355–75.10.1353/are.2006.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, R. (ed.) 2007: Tacitus: Histories Book II, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (ed.) 2012: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Tacitus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. 2018: Review of Woodman 2014, Journal of Roman Studies 108, 282–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, C. 2003: Tacitus: Histories Book I, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Davies, J. P. 2004: Rome's Religious History: Livy, Tacitus and Ammianus on their Gods, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. E. 2007: ‘A note on Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics’, in Stray, C. A. (ed.), Classical Books: Scholarship and Publishing in Britain since 1800, London, 177–9.Google Scholar
Gibson, B. 2015: ‘Fifty Shades of Orange. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries’, in Kraus and Stray 2015b, 346–75.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. and Kraus, C. S. (eds) 2002: The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. 1972: The Annals of Tacitus: Volume 1, Annals 1.1–54, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. 1981: The Annals of Tacitus: Volume 2, Annals 1.55–81 and Book 2, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. J. 2011: Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapust, D. J. 2012: ‘Tacitus and Political Thought’, in Pagán 2012, 504–28.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. 2002: ‘Introduction: Reading Commentaries/Commentaries as Reading’, in Gibson and Kraus 2002, 1–27.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. and Stray, C. 2015a: ‘Form and Content’, in Kraus and Stray 2015b, 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C. S. and Stray, C. (eds) 2015b: Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levene, D. 1993: Religion in Livy, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloch, S. J. V. (ed.) 2013: The Annals of Tacitus. Book 11, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. 2010: ‘Style and Language’, in Woodman 2010b, 195–211.Google Scholar
Pagán, V. E. (ed.) 2012: A Companion to Tacitus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 1993: ‘Tacitus and Germanicus’, in Woodman, A. J. and Luce, T. J. (eds), Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition, Princeton, NJ, 59–85.10.1515/9781400863365.59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rives, J. B. 1999: Tacitus Germania, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sailor, D. 2008: Writing and Empire in Tacitus, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511482366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syme, R. 1958: Tacitus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, Ch. 1950: Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511518607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 2004: Tacitus. The Annals. Translated with Introduction and Notes, London.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 2010a: ‘Introduction’, in Woodman 2010b, 1–14.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (ed.) 2010b: The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (ed.) with contributions from Kraus, C. S. 2014: Tacitus: Agricola, Cambridge.Google Scholar