No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2012
Many years ago it was the fortune of the writer to be present as a listener at a conversation between the architect, Sir Rowand Anderson, then at the height of his reputation, and a civil engineer of good standing in his profession. The Tay Bridge was the subject, and Sir Rowand was trying to make his interlocutor see that the existing bridge lacked one little touch, the addition of which would be of incalculable value but the absence of which made the bridge the most depressing thing of the kind that these islands hold. It must be explained that the bridge makes no pretension to be anything else but a pure work of utility and the following is its simple scheme. Starting from each bank of the Tay long ranges of girders, supported on simple metal piers, approach each other to within a short distance, the interval corresponding to the width of the main stream of the river. To give ample head room for the river traffic the trains are carried across the space of this interval on a special girder of suitable length, which is laid across this central gap, each end of it resting on the top of the other girders first described. In this position the bottom level of the special girder corresponds to the top level of the other girders, and the trains when they pass along this bottom level are at a greater clear height above the water than elsewhere on the bridge and so there is a free water-way for craft with masts.
page 49 note 1 The writer sincerely hopes that his references to ‘the Tay Bridge engineer’ will not be taken as reflecting on the engineering profession in general. They merely refer to a class in the profession, let us hope a small one, that ignore the Roman traditions which were still alive in the work of men like Rennie and Telford.
page 51 note 1 Fergusson, , History of Ancient and Medieval Architecture (3rd ed., 1893), vol. i, part I, Book iv, ch. 5, p. 385.Google Scholar
page 51 note 2 The article by Professor Bosanquet on ‘Rome the Builder,’ in chap, lxxii of Hamerton's Universal History of the World, should be consulted.
page 51 note 3 There seems never to have been published any official report as to the measurements of the bridge. The writer was accompanied on a visit there some years ago by M. Tur, the architect in charge of the piece under the Rue de Valois organisation, who gave him. interesting information but little or nothing in the way of measurements. In fact, he admitted that there were no official measurements. The figures which the reader will see on the void of the arches in fig. 7 were taken by the writer long ago from some source that he thought at the time satisfactory.