Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:12:40.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Triumph of Letters: Rewriting Cicero in ad Fam. 15

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2017

Francesca Martelli*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles

Abstract

Readings of Cicero's ad Fam. 15 commonly focus on Cicero's bid for a supplicatio in 51 b.c.e., which supplies this book of letters with one of its most dominant refrains. Yet this emphasis sits oddly with the book's position within the letter collection as a whole. This article argues that whoever organized the books of the ad Fam. into sequence has invested the idea of the supplicatio, and of Cicero's aspiration for a triumph, with a new metaphorical significance that it would not have had at the time of the letters’ writing. My reading attempts to locate this retrospective significance and to trace the portrait of Cicero that emerges from it.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Armstrong, D. 2011: ‘Epicurean virtues, Epicurean friendship: Cicero versus the Herculaneum papyri’, in Fish, J. and Sanders, K. (eds), Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, Cambridge Google Scholar
Badian, E. 1965: ‘M. Porcius Cato and the annexation and early administration of Cyprus’, Journal of Roman Studies 55, 110–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balsdon, J. 1952: Review of J. Carcopino, Cicero, the Secrets of his Correspondence (trans. E. O. Lorimer; 1951), Classical Review 2.3/4, 178–81Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2002: ‘Ciceronian correspondences: making a book out of letters’, in Wiseman, T. P. (ed.), Classics in Progress: Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome, Oxford, 103–44Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2007: The Roman Triumph, Cambridge, Mass. Google Scholar
Berry, D. H. (ed.) 1996: Cicero: Pro Sulla Oratio, Cambridge Google Scholar
Blössner, N. 2001: ‘Cicero gegen die Philosophie: eine Analyse von De re Publica 1, 1–3’, Nachtrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaft zu Göttingen aus dem Jahre 2001, Philologisch-Historische Klasse, Göttingen, 197271 Google Scholar
Boes, J. 1990: La Philosophie et l'action dans la correspondence de Cicéron, Nancy Google Scholar
Carcopino, J. 1947: Les Secrets de la correspondence de Cicéron (2 vols), Paris Google Scholar
Citroni, M. 2001: ‘Affermazioni di priorità e coscienza di progresso artistico neo poeti latini’, in Schmidt, E. (ed.), L'Histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine, Geneva, 267304 Google Scholar
Cohen, S. 2007: ‘Cicero's Roman exile’, in Gaertner, J. (ed.), Writing Exile: The Discourse of Displacement in Greco-Roman Antiquity and Beyond, Leiden, 109–28Google Scholar
Craig, C. P. 1986: ‘Cato's Stoicism and the understanding of Cicero's speech for Murena’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 116, 229–39Google Scholar
Dugan, J. 2013: ‘Cicero and the politics of ambiguity: interpreting the Pro Marcello’, in Steel, C. and van der Blom, H. (eds), Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, Oxford, 211–25Google Scholar
Dyck, A. (ed.) 2004: A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus, Ann Arbor Google Scholar
Dyer, R. R. 1990: ‘Rhetoric and intention in Cicero's Pro Marcello ’, Journal of Roman Studies 80, 1730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. 2010: ‘Fathers and sons: the Manlii Torquati’, in Kraus, C., Marincola, J. and Pelling, C. (eds), Ancient Historiography and its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman, Oxford, 205–23Google Scholar
Gagliardi, P. 1997: Il dissenso e l'ironia: per una rilettura delle orazioni “cesariane” di Cicerone, Naples Google Scholar
Gelzer, M. 1968: Caesar: Politician and Statesman, Cambridge, Mass. Google Scholar
Gibson, R. 2012: ‘On the nature of ancient letter collections’, Journal of Roman Studies 102, 5678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowing, A. 2005: Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture, Cambridge Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 1989: ‘Philosophy, politics and politicians at Rome’, in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds), Philosophia Togata I, Oxford, 137 Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 1995: ‘Philosophical badinage in Cicero's letters to his friends’, in Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher, Oxford, 325–46Google Scholar
Grillo, L. 2015: ‘Reading Cicero's Ad Familiares 1 as a collection’, Classical Quarterly 100, 114 Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1974: The Last Generation of the Roman Republic, Berkeley and Los Angeles CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderson, E. 2007: ‘S.V.B.; E.V.’, Classical Antiquity 26, 148 Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1998: ‘Cicero to Lucceius (Fam. 5.12) in its social context: valde bella?’, Classical Philology 93.4, 308–21Google Scholar
Hall, J. 2009a: Politeness and Politics in Cicero's Letters, Oxford Google Scholar
Hall, J. 2009b: ‘Serving the times: Cicero and Caesar the dictator’, in Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. A. (eds), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome, Leiden, 89110 Google Scholar
Hickson-Hahn, F. 2000: ‘Pompey's “supplicatio duplicata”: a novel form of thanksgiving’, Phoenix 54.3/4, 244–54Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998: Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry, Cambridge Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. 1998: ‘Becoming CICERO’, in Knox, P. E. and Foss, C. (eds), Style and Tradition: Studies in Honour of Wendell Clausen, Stuttgart, 248–63Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1999: ‘Ciceronian “Bi-Marcus”. Correspondence with M. T. Varro and L. P. Paetius in 46’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 129, 139–79Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 2006: ‘ An gravius aliquid scribam: Roman seniores write to iuvenes ’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 136, 247–67Google Scholar
McDermott, W. C. 1972: ‘M. Cicero and M. Tiro’, Historia 21, 259–86Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1941: ‘Epicureans in revolt’, Journal of Roman Studies 31, 149–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mommsen, T. 1889: Römische Geschichte, Leipzig Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. 2007: ‘Caesar's alleged fear of prosecution and his ratio absentis in the approach to civil war’, Historia 56, 159–78Google Scholar
Münzer, F. 1999: Roman Aristocratic Parties and Families, Baltimore Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. 1998: ‘The survival of Cicero's letters’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History IX, Brussels, 63105 Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M., and Hubbard, M. 1989: A Commentary on Horace Odes Book I, Oxford Google Scholar
Oost, S. 1955: ‘Cato Uticensis and the annexation of Cyprus’, Classical Philology 50.2, 98112 Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2011: Plutarch: Caesar, Oxford Google Scholar
Pierini, R. D'I. 2003: ‘Cicerone nella prima età imperiale. Luci ed ombre su un martire della repubblica’, in Narducci, E. (ed.), Aspetti della fortuna di Cicerone nella cultura latina, Florence, 354 Google Scholar
Quinn, K. 1980: Horace: The Odes, Bristol Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. 1974: Dignitatis Contentio: Studien zur Motivation und politischen Taktik im Bürgerkrieg zwischen Caesar und Pompeius, Munich Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1975: Cicero: A Portrait, Bristol Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1992: ‘Stratagems of vanity: Cicero, Ad Familiares 5.12 and Pliny's Letters ’, in Woodman, A. J. and Powell, J. G. F. (eds), Author and Audience in Latin Literature, Cambridge, 1832 Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1997: ‘The ethics of Brutus and Cassius’, Journal of Roman Studies 87, 4153 Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed.) 1966: Cicero: Epistulae ad Atticum Vol. V (Books XI–XIII), Cambridge Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed.) 1968: Cicero: Epistulae ad Atticum Vol. III (Books V–VII.9), Cambridge Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed.) 1977: Cicero: Epistulae ad Familiares (2 vols), Cambridge Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed. and trans.) 2001: Cicero. Letters to Friends (3 vols), Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
Stem, R. 2006: ‘Cicero as orator and philosopher: the value of the “Pro Murena” for Ciceronian political thought’, The Review of Politics 68.2, 206–31Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1986: The Augustan Aristocracy, Oxford Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1949: Party Politics in the Age of Caesar, Los Angeles and London Google Scholar
Tyrrell, R. Y., and Purser, L. C. (eds) 1914: The Correspondence of M. Tullius Cicero of Vol. IV, Dublin Google Scholar
Weinstock, S. 1971: Divus Julius, Oxford Google Scholar
White, P. 2010: Cicero in Letters, Oxford and New York Google Scholar
Wistrand, M. 1979: Cicero Imperator: Studies in Cicero's Correspondence 51–47 BC, Göteborg Google Scholar
Wolff, H. 1979: ‘Caesars neugründung von Comum und das sogennante ius Latii maius ’, Chiron 9, 169–87Google Scholar
Wright, A. 2001: ‘The death of Cicero. Forming a tradition: the contamination of history’, Historia 50.4, 436–52Google Scholar