Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:10:20.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Community Care Changes: Unresolved Tensions in Policy and Issues in Implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2009

Abstract

Many of the difficulties of implementing the new community care policy arise from the fact that local authorities are being asked to make substantial changes on a large number of fronts. However, studies to date have tended to concentrate on only single areas of change. This article aims to provide a wide-ranging discussion of the new policy and its implementation, drawing on empirical research for illustration.

The article suggests first that it is important to situate the difficulties local authorities are experiencing in implementing the changes in the context of the unresolved tensions contained within the objectives of the reforms. The problems these issues raise for implementation are then examined in relation to two main areas: care management and assessment, and enabling, drawing on a two-year monitoring project (from mid-1992 to mid-1994) in one shire county, one inner London borough and three outer London boroughs. The article concludes by speculating on what the changes will mean for the future of social service provision.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, I., Hogg, D. and Peace, S. (1992), Elderly People. Choice, Participation and Satisfaction, Policy Studies Institute, London.Google Scholar
Audit Commission (1986), Making a Reality of Community Care, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Audit Commission (1992), Community Care, Managing the Cascade of Change, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Audit Commission (1993), Taking Care, Audit Commission, London.Google Scholar
Baldock, J. and Evers, A. (1991), ‘Citizenship and frail old people: changing patterns of provision in Europe’, Social Policy Review, 19901991.Google Scholar
Baldock, J. and Evers, A. (1992), ‘Innovations and care of the elderly: the cutting edges of change for social welfare systems, Examples from Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK’, Ageing and Society, 12: 3, 289312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, N. (1990), Welfare, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Beardshaw, V. (1991), Implementing Assessment and Care Management: Learning from Local Experience 1990–1991, King's Fund College Papers 3, London.Google Scholar
Challis, D. (1992), Community Care of Elderly People: Bringing together Scarcity and Choice, Needs and Costs, PSSRU, Discussion Paper 813, University of Kent.Google Scholar
Challis, D. and Davies, B. (1986), Case Management in Community Care, Gower, Aldershot.Google Scholar
CI (92) 34 (1992), Social Services Inspectorate and Department of Health letter, 14/12/92.Google Scholar
Cm. 849 (1989), Caring for People, Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Committee of Public Accounts (1988), Twenty Sixth Report, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Davies, B. (1992), ‘Care management and the social services: on breeding the best chameleons’, Generations Review, 2: 2, 1821.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1990a), Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond, Policy Guidance, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1990b), Community Care Implementation Documents, Planning, DH, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Price Waterhouse (1991), Implementing Community Care, Purchaser, Commissioner and Provider Roles, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1988), Community Care: an Agenda for Action, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Services Inspectorate (1991), Purchase of Service Guidance, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health, Social Services Inspectorate, National Health Service Management Executive and Price Waterhouse (1992), Implementing Community Care, Model of Purchasing Care for Elderly People, DH, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health, Social Services Inspectorate, Scottish Office Social Work Services Group (1991a), Care Management and Assessment, Practitioners' Guide, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health Social Services Inspectorate, Scottish Office Social Work Services Group (1991b), Care Management and Assessment, Managers' Guide, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
District Audit Service (1992), Constructing Budgets for Purchasing Community Care, Audit Commission, London.Google Scholar
EI (93) 18/Cl (93) 12 Department of Health letter, ‘Implementing Caring for People’, 15/3/93, DH, London.Google Scholar
Evandrou, M., Arber, S., Dale, A. and Gilbert, N. (1986), ‘Who cares for the elderly? Family care provision and receipt of statutory services’, in Phillipson, C., Bernard, M., Strang, P. (eds.) Dependency and Interdependency in Old Age: Theoretical Perspectives and Policy Alternatives, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (1989), ‘Women, welfare and politics of need interpretation’, in Lassman, P. (ed.) Politics and Social Theory, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Glennerster, H. with Korman, N. and Marsden-Wison, F. (1983), Planning for Priority Groups, Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
HC 580–1 (1990), Eighth Report of the Social Services Committee, Community Care Planning and Cooperation, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
HC 482–1 (1993), Sixth Report of the Health Committee, Community Care: The Way Forward, vol. 1, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Henwood, M. (1992), Through a Glass Darkly, Community Care and Elderly People, King's Fund Institute Research Report no. 14, London.Google Scholar
Hunter, D. J. (1992), ‘To market! To market! A new dawn for community care?’ Health and Social Care, 1, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lac (92) 27 (1992), Department of Health circular, National Assistance Act 1948 (choice of accommodation) directions, 23/12, DH, London.Google Scholar
LASSL (92) 12 (1992), Department of Health Social Services Letter, ‘Community Care – Special Transitional Grant, Conditions and Indicative Allocations’, 14 12, DH, London.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (1993), Quasl-markets and Community Care, School for Advanced Urban Studies, Bristol.Google Scholar
Meredith, B. (1993), The Community Care Handbook The New System Explained, Age Concern England Books, London.Google Scholar
Nevitt, D. (1977), ‘Demand and need’ in Foundations of Social Administration, Heisler, H. (ed.) Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. (1993), Managerialism and the Public Services 2nd edn.Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Schorr, A. (1992), The Personal Social Services: An Outside View, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York.Google Scholar
Sinclair, I. et al. (1990) The Kaleidoscope of Care: A Review of Research on Welfare Provision for Elderly People, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (1980), Social Need, Policy, Practice and Research, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Smith, R. et al. , (1993), Working Together for Better Community Care, School for Advanced Urban Studies, Bristol.Google Scholar
Stevenson, O. and Parsloe, P. (1993), Community Care and Empowerment, Joseph Rowntree Foundation and Community Care, York.Google Scholar
Walker, A. (1989), ‘Community care’, in McCarthy, M. (ed.) The New Politics of Welfare, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Walsh, K. (1989), ‘Competition and service in local government’, in Stewart, J. and Stoker, G. (eds.) The Future of Local Government, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Wistow, G. (1990), Community Care Implementation Documents, Community care planning: a review of past experiences and future imperatives, DH, CCI 3, London.Google Scholar
Wistow, G. and Henwood, M. (1990), ‘Planning in a mixed economy: life after Griffiths’ in Parry, R. (ed.) Privatisation, 3244, Jessica Kingsley, London.Google Scholar
Wistow, G., Knapp, M., Hardy, B. and Allen, C. (1992), ‘From providing to enabling: local authorities and the mixed economy of social care’, Public Administration, 70, 2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar