Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:14:56.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equal Rights and Equal Duties? Activating Labour Market Policy and the Participation of Long-term Unemployed People with Disabilities after the Reform of the German Welfare State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2009

ANGELA RAUCH  and
JOHANNA DORNETTE
ANGELA RAUCH*
Affiliation:
Institute for Employment Research IAB, Research Institute of the German Federal Employment Agency, Research Unit ‘Joblessness and Social Inclusion’, Regensburger Str. 104, D-90478 Nürnberg
JOHANNA DORNETTE*
Affiliation:
Institute for Employment Research IAB, Research Institute of the German Federal Employment Agency, Research Unit ‘Joblessness and Social Inclusion’, Regensburger Str. 104, D-90478 Nürnberg
*
*email: angela.rauch@iab.de
email: johanna.dornette@iab.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent German welfare state reform with the introduction of Social Code II has created a complex situation for the labour market integration of long-term unemployed people with disabilities. A range of social laws with differing underlying principles is now applicable. In this article, we examine the effects that the implementation of this social code has on long-term unemployed people with disabilities. We show that their integration patterns changed. This is due to the building of new institutions responsible for labour market integration, followed by a temporary destabilisation of work routines at the operational level. Additionally, more persistent consequences occur because the inconsistencies of the relevant laws are creating an area of conflict, which is increasing the risk of marginalising people with disabilities in terms of labour market integration.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 53 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abberley, P. 2002, ‘Work, disability and the European social theory’, in Barnes, C., Oliver, M. and Barton, L. (eds.), Disability Studies Today, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. 2002, ‘Disability, policy and politics’, The Policy Press, 30: 3, 311–18.Google Scholar
Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. 2005, ‘Disability, work and welfare: challenging the social exclusion of disabled people’, Work, Employment and Society, 19: 3, 527–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruttel, O. and Sol, E. 2006, ‘Work first as a European Model? Evidence from Germany and the Netherlands’, The Policy Press, 34: 1, 69–89.Google Scholar
Clarke, L., Bingham, C., Michielsens, E. and Miller, S. 2007, ‘A social or a capabilities mode? Approaches to disability in the construction and health sectors in Britain and the Netherlands compared’, Presentation at the International Labour Process Conference in Amsterdam, April.Google Scholar
CEC (Commission of the European Communities) 2003, ‘Equal opportunities for people with disabilities: a European Action Plan’, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/news/2003/oct/en.pdf.Google Scholar
CEC (Commission of the European Communities) 2004, European Commission Disability Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria, 9–11 December 2004, Sofia, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/disability/conference_bulgaria/sofia_issues_paper_en.pdf.Google Scholar
CEC (Commission of the European Communities) 2005, ‘Situation of disabled people in the enlarged European Union: the European Action Plan 2006–2007’, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/index/com_2005_604_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Dingeldey, I. 2007, ‘Between workfare and enablement – the different paths to transformation of the welfare state: a comparative analysis of activating labour market policies’, European Journal of Political Research, 46: 6, 823–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornette, J., Rauch, A., Schubert, M., Behrens, J., Höhne, A. and Zimmermann, M. 2008, ‘Auswirkungen der Einführung des Sozialgesetzbuches II auf erwerbsfähige hilfebedürftige Personen mit gesundheitlichen Beeinträchtigungen’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 54: 1, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B. and Eichhorst, W. 2006, ‘Employment regulation and labour market policy in Germany 1991–2005’, IZA discussion paper No 2505, Bonn, available at: http://www.iza.org.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, T. 1986, The Foundations of Bioethics, Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, C. 1990, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
European Parliament 2000, ‘Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
EU (European Union) 2005, ‘Council Decision of 12 July 2005 on Guidelines for the Employment Policies of the Member States’, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32005D0600:EN:HTML.Google Scholar
Fenger, M. 2006, ‘Shifts in welfare governance: the state, private and non-profit sectors in four European countries’, in Henman, P. and Fenger, M. (eds.), Administering Welfare Reform: International Transformations in Welfare Governance, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
German Bundestag 2003, ‘Plenarprotokoll 15/60’, available at: http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btp/15/15060.pdf.Google Scholar
German Bundestag 2008, ‘Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany’, available at: http://www.bundestag.de/htdocs_e/parliament/function/legal/germanbasiclaw.pdf.Google Scholar
German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs 2007, ‘Social Security: 10. Rehabilitation and integration of people with disabilities’, BMAS, Berlin, available at: http://www.bmas.de/coremedia/generator/1086/soziale_sicherung_10_rehabilitation.html.Google Scholar
German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs 2008, ‘Social security at a glance’, BMAS, Berlin, available at: http://www.bmas.bund.de/BMAS/Navigation/Service/publikationen,did=96844.html.Google Scholar
Gooding, C. 1995, ‘Employment and disabled people: equal rights or positive action’, in Zarb, G. (ed.), Removing Disabling Barriers, London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Henman, P. and Fenger, M. 2006, ‘Reforming welfare governance: reflections’, in Henman, P. and Fenger, M. (eds.), Administering Welfare Reform. International Transformations in Welfare Governance, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Heyer, K. C. 2002, ‘The ADA on the road: disability rights in Germany’, Law and Social Inquiry, 27: 4, 723–62.Google Scholar
Hudson, J., Hwang, G.-J. and Kühner, S. 2008, ‘Between ideas, institutions and interests: analysing third way welfare reform programmes in Germany and the United Kingdom’, Journal of Social Policy, 37: 2, 207–30.Google Scholar
Hyde, M. 2000, ‘From welfare to work? Social policy for disabled people of working age in the United Kingdom in the 1990s’, Disability and Society, 15: 2, 327–41.Google Scholar
ISR, IAJ, infas, Simma & Partner and WZB 2007, Untersuchungsfeld 2: Implementations- und Gouvernanceanalyse. Zwischenbericht Mai 2007', Frankfurt, available at: http://hartz.isg-institut.de/HartzIV/download.htm.Google Scholar
Kemp, P. A., Sundén, A. and Bakker-Tauritz, B. 2006, Sick Societies? Trends in Disability Benefits in Post-industrial Welfare States, Geneva: International Social Security Association.Google Scholar
Konle-Seidl, R., Eichhorst, W. and Grienberger-Zingerle, M. 2007, ‘Activation policies in Germany: from Status Protection to Basic Income Support’, IAB-discussion paper No. 6, Nürnberg, available at: http://www.iab.de/asp/order/vvzjahrOhne.asp?doktyp=dp&jahr=2007.Google Scholar
Kruppe, T. 2006, ‘Die Instrumente der Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Welche Rolle spielt die Weiterbildung (noch)?’, in Loebe, H. and Severing, E. (eds.), Weiterbildung auf dem Prüfstand. Mehr Innovation und Integration durch neue Wege der Qualifizierung, Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Kuptsch, C. and Zeitzer, I. R. 2001, ‘Public disability programs under new complex pressures’, in Hoskins, D. D., Dobbernack, D. and Kuptsch, C. (eds.), Social Security at the Dawn of the 21st Century, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Lay, W. and Hansmeier, T. 2004, ‘Zwischen Gerechtigkeit und Effizienz? Verteilungsgerechtigkeit in der beruflichen Rehabilitation’, in Liebig, S., Lengefeld, H. and Mau, S. (eds.), Verteilungsprobleme und Gerechtigkeit in modernen Gesellschaften, Frankfurt/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Liebig, O. 2001, ‘Individuelle Wunschrechte stärken’, Bundesarbeitsblatt, 11: 12–16.Google Scholar
Lindsay, C., McQuaid, R. W. and Dutton, M. 2007, ‘New approaches to employability in the UK: combining “Human Capital Development” and “Work First” strategies?’, Journal of Social Policy, 36: 4, 539–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maschke, M. 2004, ‘Behinderung als Feld wohlfahrtsstaatlicher Politik. Eine Systematisierung der Behindertenpolitik’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 14: 3, 399–420.Google Scholar
Maschner, U. 2001, ‘Tiefgreifender Wandel’, Bundesarbeitsblatt, 11, 5–11.Google Scholar
Niehaus, M. 1997, ‘Barrieren gegen die Beschäftigung langfristig arbeitsloser Behinderter’, in Niehaus, M. and Montada, L. (eds.), Behinderte auf dem Arbeitsmarkt: Wege aus dem Abseits, Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) 2003, Transforming Disability into Ability, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Oliver, M. 1983, Social Work with Disabled People, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schneider, H., Brenke, K., Kaiser, L., Steinwede, J., Jesske, B. and Uhlendorff, A. 2006, ‘Evaluation der Maßnahmen zur Umsetzung der Vorschläge der Hartz-Kommission, Modul 1b: Förderung beruflicher Weiterbildung und Transferleistungen’, IZA research report No. 07, Bonn, available at: http://www.bmas.de/coremedia/generator/1808/property=pdf/evaluation_der_massnahmen_hartz_arbeitspaket_1b.pdf.Google Scholar
Schubert, M., Behrens, J., Hauger, M., Hippmann, C., Hobler, D., Höhne, A., Schneider, E. and Zimmermann, M. 2007, ‘Struktur- und Prozessänderungen in der beruflichen Rehabilitation nach der Einführung des SGB II – eine qualitative Implementationsstudie’, in Dornette, J. and Rauch, A. (eds.), Berufliche Rehabilitation im Kontext des SGB II, IAB-Bibliothek No. 309, Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Serrano Pascual, A. 2007, ‘Reshaping welfare states: activation regimes in Europe’, in Serrano Pascual, A. and Magnusson, L. (eds.), Reshaping Welfare States and Activation Regimes in Europe, Brussels: Peter Lang S.A.Google Scholar
UN (United Nations) 1994, ‘Standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for people with disabilities’, United Nations, New York, available at: http://www.un.org/Depts/escap/decade/st-rules.htm.Google Scholar