Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T17:23:48.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Family Size Equivalence Scales and Survey Evaluations of Income and Well-Being*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Bruce Bradbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The determination of the different needs of families of different compositions is necessary in order to ensure horizontal equity in tax/transfer policies. Despite the seeming simplicity of the problem, a consensus as to the appropriate means of determining relative need remains elusive. One approach which has been proposed has been to use social surveys to analyse the relationship between subjective evaluations of well-being and incomes. This paper examines such methods, and discusses the key assumptions upon which they rest. An explanation is advanced as to why these methods may lead to an understatement of the differences in relative needs of different family types.

Type
Survey Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , July 1989 , pp. 383 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Australian Values Study Survey 1983 (machine-readable data file). Data collected by Roy Morgan Research Centre. Melbourne: Australian Values Study Steering Committee (producer). 1984. Canberra: Social Sciences Data Archives, The Australian National University (distributor), 1986. 1 data file (1228 logical records) + accompanying user's guide (pp.242).Google Scholar
Bradbury, Bruce, Rossiter, Chris and Vipond, Joan (1986), Poverty, Before and After Paying for Housing, Social Welfare Research Centre. Reports and Proceedings No. 56. University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Deaton, Angus and Muellbauer, John (1980). Economics and Consumer Behaviour, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleeck, H. (1989), ‘The adequacy of the social security system in Belgium, 1976–1985’, Journal of Social Policy, 18:1, 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubnoff, Steven (1985), ‘How much income is enough? Measuring public judgements’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 285–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubnoff, Steven, Vaughan, Denton and Lancaster, Clarise (1981), ‘Income satisfaction measures in equivalence scale applications’, in American Statistical Association, 1981 Proceedings of the Business and Statistics Section, Washington.Google Scholar
Goedhart, Theo, Halberstadt, Victor, Kapteyn, Arie and Praag, Bernard Van (1977), ‘The poverty line: concept and measurement’, Journal of Human Resources, XII:4. 503–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagenaars, Aldi (1986), The Perception of Poverty, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kapteyn, Arie (1977), A Theory of Preference Formation, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Leyden University.Google Scholar
Kapteyn, Arie, Kooreman, Peter and Willemse, Rob (1988), ‘Some methodological issues in the implementation of subjective poverty definitions’, The Journal of Human Resources, XXIII (2), 222–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapteyn, Arie and Van Praag, Bernard (1976), ‘A new approach to the construction of family equivalence scales’, European Economic Review, 7, 313–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapteyn, Arie and Wansbeek, Tom (1985). ‘The individual welfare function, a review’. Journal of Economic Psychology, 6. 333–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muellbauer, John (1977), ‘Testing the Barten model of household composition effects and the cost of children’, The Economic Journal, 87, 460–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1982), The OECD List of Social Indicators, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Piachaud, David (1987), ‘Problems in the definition and measurement of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 16:2, 125–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, Robert A. and Wales, Terence J. (1979), ‘Welfare comparisons and equivalence scales’, American Economic Review, (papers and proceedings), 69:2, 216–21.Google Scholar
Ratchford, Brian T. (1985), ‘The individual welfare function, a comment’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 6, 363–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainwater, Lee (1974), What Money Buys: Inequality and the Social Meanings af Income, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Van der Sar, Nico, Van Praag, Bernard and Dubnoff, Steven (1986), ‘Evaluation Questions and Income Utility’, mimeo.Google Scholar
Van Praag, Bernard, Hagenaars, Aldi and Van Weeren, H. (1982), ‘Poverty in Europe’, Review of Income and Wealth, 28:3, 345–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Praag, Bernard and Van der Sar, Nico (1988), ‘Household cost functions and equivalence scales’, The Journal of Human Resources, XXIII (2), 191–210.Google Scholar
Van Praag, Bernard, Kapteyn, Arie and Van Herwaarden, Floor (1979), ‘The definition and measurement of social reference spaces’, The Netherlands' Journal of Sociology, 15, 13–25.Google Scholar
Saunders, Peter and Bradbury, Bruce (1989), Some Australian Evidence on the Consensual Approach to Poverty Measurement, Social Welfare Research Centre, Discussion Paper, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Veit-Wilson, John (1987), ‘Consensual approaches to poverty lines and social security’, Journal of Social Policy, 16:2, 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Robert (1987), ‘Consensual approaches to the definition of poverty: towards an alternative methodology’, Journal of Social Policy, 16:2, 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wansbeek, Tom and Kapteyn, Arie (1983), ‘Tackling hard questions by means of soft methods: the use of individual welfare functions in socio-economic policy’, Kyklos, 36:2, 249–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteford, Peter (1985), A Family's Needs: Equivalence Scales, Poverty and Social Security, Research Paper No. 27, Development Division, Department of Social Security, Canberra.Google Scholar