Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:35:10.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Egalitarians, Equalities and Welfare Evaluation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Michael O'Higgins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on the nature of the egalitarian policy objectives of the welfare state, and on the evaluation and assessment of social policies in the light of those objectives. This focus reflects the pervasive but often ill-defined presence of equality as an objective for social policy, without asserting that it is either unique or uncontested as an objective. The paper does not offer an evaluation of the success or failure of the welfare state in relation to equality; rather it is concerned with exploring what might be and is meant by equality as a target for social policy, with presenting some contrasting conceptions of equality, and with discussing the implications of the multiple meanings of equality for the way in which we think about issues in social policy and, in particular, about the impact of social welfare programmes.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Castles, F. (1985), The Working Class and Welfare, George Allen and Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Crick, B. (1975), ‘Equality in August’, New Statesman, 22 08.Google Scholar
Crosland, C.A.R. (1956), The Future of Socialism, Jonathan Cape, London. (Page references are to the 1964 edition).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1981), ‘What is Equality?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10 (3 and 4): 185–246 and 283–345.Google Scholar
George, V. and Wilding, P. (1984), The Impact of Social Policy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. (1980), Liberal Equality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harding, A. (1984). Who Benefits?: The Australian Welfare State and Redistribution, SWRC Reports and Proceedings No. 45, Sydney, Social Welfare Research Centre, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Hayek, F.A. (1976), The Mirage of Social Justice: Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol.2, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Hedström, P. and Ringen, S. (1985), ‘Age and Income in Contemporary Society: A Seven Country Study’, paper presented to the Luxembourg Income Study Conference, 07 1985.Google Scholar
Jencks, C. (1985), ‘What Must be Equal for Opportunity to be Equal?’, mimeo, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Lawson, R. (1984), ‘Social Security, Social Status and the Elderly in West Germany’, in Walker, R., Lawson, R. and Townsend, P. (eds.) Responses to Poverty: Lessons from Europe, Heinemann, London, pp. 283–301.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (1982), The Strategy of Equality: Redistribution and the Social Services, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (1984), ‘Equity as an Economic Objective’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 1 (1): 39–51.Google Scholar
Manning, I. (1985), Incomes and Policy, George Allen and Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974), Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
O'Higgins, M. (1985), ‘Welfare, Redistribution and Inequality: Disillusion, Illusion and Reality’, in Bean, P., Ferris, J. and Whynes, D. (eds.) In Defence of Welfare, Tavistock, London, pp. 162–79.Google Scholar
O'Higgins, M. (1986), ‘Public-Private Interaction in Social Policy: A Comparative Study of Pensions Provision in Sweden, West Germany and the United Kingdom’, in Rainwater, L. and Rein, M. (eds.) The Public-Private Interplay in Social Protection, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. (1979), Equality, Justice and Rectification, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Pinker, R. (1974), ‘Social Policy and Social Justice’, Journal of Social Policy, 3 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Rae, D. (1981), Equalities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1980), ‘Equality of What?’ in McMurrin, S. (ed.) Tanner Lectures on Human Values, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 197–220.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1982), ‘Two Cheers for the Welfare State: Public Opinion and Private Welfare’, Journal of Public Policy, 2 (4): 319–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1983), ‘The Distributional Compulsion and the Moral Order of the Welfare State’, in Ellis, A. and Kumar, K. (eds.) Dilemmas of Liberal Democracies: Studies in Fred Hirsch's Social Limits to Growth, Tavistock, London, pp. 98–121.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1985), ‘Attitudes to Welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 14 (1): 73–81.Google Scholar
Temkin, L. (1986), ‘Inequality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 15 (2): 99–121.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. and Davidson, N. (1982), Inequalities in Health, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Weale, A. (1985a) ‘The Welfare State and Two Conflicting Ideals of Equality’, Government and Opposition, 20 (3): 315–27.Google Scholar
Weale, A. (1985b), ‘Mr. Fowler's Psychology: Reform of Social Security’, Political Quarterly, 56 (4): 321–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, J. (1983), ‘Welfare, Class and Distributive Justice’, in Bean, P. and MacPherson, S. (eds.) Approaches to Welfare, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 48–63.Google Scholar