Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:42:37.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Housing Pathways and Stratification: Some Evidence from a British National Survey*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

O. Sullivan  and
M. J. Murphy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five principles determining movement in the housing market relating to tenure, social class and fertility status were suggested by Payne and Payne (1977) on the basis of a small-scale study in Aberdeen. Analysis of a large-scale nationally-representative survey containing full housing and maternity histories suggests that some of these principles require modification at the national level. For example, movement into and between tenures, although heavily influenced by demographic and socio-economic factors, is not as rigid as the Aberdeen study suggested. The interaction of social class, age at marriage and childbearing patterns is assessed. Finally, changes over time in these relationships and the long-term effects on final family size and tenure are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 147 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Busfield, J. and Paddon, M. (1977), Thinking About Children, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cartwright, A. (1976), How Many Children?, Routledge and Kegan Paul. London.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment (1982), Housing and Construction Statistics 1971–1981, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Dunnell, K. (OPCS)(1979), Family Formation 1976, HMSO. London.Google Scholar
Holmans, A. (1981), ‘Housing careers of recently married couples’, Population Trends 24, HMSO, London, pp.10–14.Google Scholar
Ineichen, B. (1979). ‘Housing factors in the timing of weddings and first pregnancies’, in Harris, C.C. (ed.) Sociology of the Family: New Directions for Britain, University of Keele Sociological Review Monograph 28, Keele, pp.127–40.Google Scholar
Mackay, G. A. and Moir, A. C. (1980), North Sea Oil and the Aberdeen Economy, North Sea Oil Panel Occasional Paper No. 3, Social Science Research Council. London.Google Scholar
Madge, J. and Brown, C. (1981), First Homes: A Survey of the Housing Circumstances of Young Married Couples. Policy Studies Institute, London.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. J. and Sullivan, O. (1983), Housing Tenure and Fertility in Post-War Britain, Centre for Population Studies Research Paper 83–2, Centre for Population Studies, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1983a). General Household Survey 1981, HMSO. London.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1983b), Census 1981: National Report, Great Britain — Part 2, HMSO. London.Google Scholar
Payne, J. and Payne, G. (1977), ‘Housing pathways and stratification: A study of life chances in the housing market’, Journal of Social Policy, 6:2, 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar