Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:32:18.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Women's Political Representation affects Spending on Family Benefits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

LAURENZ ENNSER-JEDENASTIK Open the ORCID record for LAURENZ ENNSER-JEDENASTIK [Opens in a new window]
LAURENZ ENNSER-JEDENASTIK*
Affiliation:
Department of Government, University of Vienna, Rooseveltplatz 3/1, 1090 Vienna, Austria email: laurenz.ennser@univie.ac.at
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent research finds that women's political representation correlates with higher social expenditures. This paper makes two more specific predictions regarding family benefits. First, women voters and politicians are likely to prefer in-kind benefits to cash transfers. This is because the provision of childcare does more than money can do to ameliorate the double burden of work and family duties, thus strengthening women's autonomy. As a consequence female political representation should correlate with spending on in-kind family benefits, but not with expenditures on cash transfers. Second, the pressure on politicians to provide childcare services should be greater when there are higher levels of female participation in the labour force. Assuming that women politicians are more responsive to such demands, we should see a positive interaction effect between female labour force participation and women's political representation on in-kind spending. An analysis of public expenditures for family benefits in 27 OECD nations between 1980 and 2011 bears out both propositions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 563 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armingeon, K., Isler, C., Knöpfel, L., Weisstanner, D. and Engler, S. (2015), Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2013, Bern, Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.Google Scholar
Beck, N. and Katz, J.N. (1995), ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data’, American Political Science Review, 89: 3, 634–647.Google Scholar
Bertone, C. (2003), ‘Claims for child care as struggles over needs: Comparing Italian and Danish women's organizations’, Social Politics, 10: 2, 229–255.Google Scholar
Bolzendahl, C. and Brooks, C. (2007), ‘Women's political representation and welfare state spending in 12 capitalist democracies’, Social Forces, 85: 4, 1509–1534.Google Scholar
Bolzendahl, C. (2009), ‘Making the implicit explicit: Gender influences on social spending in twelve industrialized democracies, 1980–99’, Social Politics, 16: 1, 40–81.Google Scholar
Bolzendahl, C. (2010), ‘Directions of Decommodification: Gender and Generosity in 12 OECD Nations, 1980–2000’, European Sociological Review, 26: 2, 125–141.Google Scholar
Bolzendahl, C. (2011), ‘Beyond the big picture: gender influences on disaggregated and domain-specific measures of social spending, 1980–1999’, Politics & Gender, 7: 01, 35–70.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. and Reber, F. (2010), ‘The political economy of childcare in OECD countries: Explaining cross-national variation in spending and coverage rates’, European Journal of Political Research, 49: 1, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, T., Clark, W.R. and Golder, M. (2006), ‘Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses’, Political Analysis, 14: 1, 63–82.Google Scholar
Bratton, K.A. and Ray, L.P. (2002), ‘Descriptive representation, policy outcomes, and municipal day-care coverage in Norway’, American Journal of Political Science, 46: 2, 428–437.Google Scholar
Bussemaker, J. and Van Kersbergen, K. (1994), ‘Gender and welfare states: some theoretical reflections’, in Sainsbury, D. (ed.), Gendering welfare states, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Childs, S. and Krook, M.L. (2008), ‘Critical mass theory and women's political representation’, Political Studies, 56: 3, 725–736.Google Scholar
Cooke, L.P. (2009), ‘Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain’, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 1, 123–140.Google Scholar
Craig, L. and Mullan, K. (2011), ‘How mothers and fathers share childcare: a cross-national time-use comparison’, American Sociological Review, 76: 6, 834–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, D. (1988), ‘From a small to a large minority: women in Scandinavian politics’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 11: 4, 275–298.Google Scholar
Finseraas, H., Jakobsson, N. and Kotsadam, A. (2012), ‘The gender gap in political preferences: An empirical test of a political economy explanation’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19: 2, 219–242.Google Scholar
Flora, P. and Heidenheimer, A.J. (1981), The development of welfare states in Europe and America, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Förster, M.F. and Verbist, G. (2012), Money or kindergarten? Distributive effects of cash versus in-kind family transfers for young children, Paris: OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 135.Google Scholar
Giles-Sims, J., Green, J.C. and Lockhart, C. (2012), ‘Do Women Legislators Have a Positive Effect on the Supportiveness of States Toward Older Citizens?’, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 33: 1, 38–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, S. (1994), ‘Childcare and types of welfare states’, in Sainsbury, D. (ed.), Gendering Welfare States, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hobson, B. and Lindholm, M. (1997), ‘Collective identities, women's power resources, and the making of welfare states’, Theory and Society, 26: 4, 475–508.Google Scholar
Huber, E. and Stephens, J.D. (2000), ‘Partisan governance, women's employment, and the social democratic service state’, American Sociological Review, 65: 3, 323–342.Google Scholar
Huber, E. and Stephens, J.D. (2001), Development and crisis of the welfare state: parties and policies in global markets, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Norris, P. (2003), Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Rosenbluth, F. (2006), ‘The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap’, American Journal of Political Science, 50: 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (1986), ‘Gender and reproduction, or babies and the state’, Studies in Political Economy, 20: 20, 9–46.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. and Mahon, R. (1993), ‘Representing solidarity: class, gender and the crisis in Social-Democratic Sweden’, New Left Review, I: 201, 76–100.Google Scholar
Kamerman, S.B. and Gatenio-Gabel, S. (2010), ‘Cash vs. care: a child and family policy issue’, in Sipilä, J., Repo, K. and Rissanen, T. (eds.), Cash-for-Childcare, The Consequences for Caring Mothers, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kanter, R.M. (1977a), Men and Women of the Corporation, New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
Kanter, R.M. (1977b), ‘Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women’, American Journal of Sociology, 82: 5, 965–990.Google Scholar
Kittilson, M.C. (2008), ‘Representing women: The adoption of family leave in comparative perspective’, The Journal of Politics, 70: 02, 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (1983), The democratic class struggle, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krook, M.L. and O'Brien, D.Z. (2012), ‘All the president's men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide’, The Journal of Politics, 74: 03, 840–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (1992), ‘Gender and the development of welfare regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy, 2: 3, 159–173.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. and Åström, G. (1992), ‘Equality, difference, and state welfare: labor market and family policies in Sweden’, Feminist Studies, 18: 1, 59–87.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, J. and Norris, P. (2003), ‘Westminster women: The politics of presence’, Political Studies, 51: 1, 84–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, J. (2003), ‘Women as agents in welfare state development: a cross-national analysis of family allowance adoption’, Socio-Economic Review, 1: 2, 185–214.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D.Z., Mendez, M., Peterson, J.C. and Shin, J. (2015), ‘Letting Down the Ladder or Shutting the Door: Female Prime Ministers, Party Leaders, and Cabinet Ministers’, Politics & Gender, 11: 4, 689–717.Google Scholar
OECD (2014), Social Expenditure Database. DOI: 10.1787/els-socx-data-en.Google Scholar
Orloff, A.S. (1993), ‘Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states’, American Sociological Review, 58: 3, 303–328.Google Scholar
Orloff, A.S. (1996), ‘Gender in the welfare state’, Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 1, 51–78.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (1995), The politics of presence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (1994), Gendering welfare states, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (1999), Gender and Welfare State Regimes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L. and Allan, J. (2006), ‘Welfare-state decommodification in 18 OECD countries: a replication and revision’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16: 1, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sefton, T., Evandrou, M. and Falkingham, J. (2011), ‘Family ties: women's work and family histories and their association with incomes in later life in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 40: 1, 41–69.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1992), Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, J.D. (1979), The transition from capitalism to socialism: Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
Svaleryd, H. (2009), ‘Women's representation and public spending’, European Journal of Political Economy, 25: 2, 186–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiss, L., Fallon, K.M. and Burgos, G. (2012), ‘Does critical mass matter? Women's political representation and child health in developing countries’, Social Forces, 91: 2, 531–558.Google Scholar
Weir, M., Orloff, A.S. and Skocpol, T. (1988), The politics of social policy in the United States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H.L. (1975), The welfare state and equality: structural and ideological roots of public expenditures, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar