Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:17:45.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Implementation of Housing Benefit*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Michael Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article sees the new housing benefit scheme as a policy initiative which presents local authorities, as the implementing agencies, with enormous problems in making a success of the operation of a scheme deeply flawed because of the government's commitment to save staff costs and avoid increases in benefit costs. It looks at the way in which during the policy-making process there was a move away from the ordiginal commitment to ‘unified housing benefit’ and explores the consequences of this for implementation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , July 1984 , pp. 297 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barrett, S. and Fudge, C. (eds)(1981), Policy and Action, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Barrett, S. and Hill, M. (1982), Report to the SSRC Central-Local Relations Panel, unpublished.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment (1977), Second Report of the Advisory Committee on Rent Rebates and Rent Allowances, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment (1981), Assistance with Housing Costs, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1978), Social Assistance, DHSS. London.Google Scholar
Donnison, D.V. (1981), The Politics of Poverty, Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
Elmore, R. (1980), ‘Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions’, Political Science Quarterly, 94, 601–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, A. (1983), The Housing Benefit Bungle, unpublished paper, Sunderland Polytechnic.Google Scholar
Hill, M. (1983), Housing Benefit Implementation: From Unified Ideal to Complex Reality, SAUS Working Paper 36, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Hjern, B. and D.O. Porter (1981), ‘Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis’, Organizational Studies, 2, 211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjern, B. and Hull, C. (1982), ‘Implementation research as empirical constitutionalism’, in Hjern, B. and Hull, C. (eds). Implementation Beyond Hierarchy, special issue of European Journal of Political Research, 10, 105–15.Google Scholar
Legg, C. and Brion, M. (1976), The Administration of Rent Rebate and Rent Allowance Schemes, Department of the Environment, London.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1980), Street Level Bureaucracy, Russell Sage, New York.Google Scholar
Means, R. and Hill, M. (1982), ‘The administration of rent rebates’, Journal of Social Welfare Law, 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevitt, A.A. (1966), Housing, Taxation and Subsidies, Nelson, London.Google Scholar
Pressman, J. and Wildavsky, A. (1973), Implementation, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Prottas, J.M. (1979), People Processing, D.C. Heath, Lexington, Mass.Google Scholar
Raynsford, N. and McGurk, P. (1984), Guide to Housing Benefit, latest edition, SHAC and Institute of Housing, London.Google Scholar