Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:35:43.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Poverty Measurement and the Within-Household Distribution: Agenda for Action*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Abstract

Mainsteam poverty analysis is deficient because it ignores important within-household aspects. This point has been made by many, and stressed by feminists especially, yet mainstream poverty measurement practice remains unchanged. Why is this? What should we be doing? This paper examines anew the case for taking within-household factors into account in poverty measurement. The analysis reveals a number of unresolved issues including some problems with recent feminist arguments, but concludes that there is a good case for changing current practice. To demonstrate that this is feasible, four research projects are described. These are my agenda for action.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Apps, P.F. and Jones, G. (1986), ‘Selective taxation of couples’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 5, 115.Google Scholar
Apps, P.F. and Rees, R. (1988), ‘Taxation and the household’, Journal of Public Economics, 35, 355–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. (1983), The Economics of Inequality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. (1989), ‘How should we measure poverty? Some conceptual issues’, in Atkinson, A.B. (ed.), Poverty and Social Security, Harvester-Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. (1991), ‘Poverty, statistics, and progress in Europe’, Discussion Paper WSP/60, ST/ICERD, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
Beckerman, W. and Clark, S. (1982), Poverty and Social Security in Britain Since 1961, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brannen, J. and Wilson, G. (1987), Give and Take in Families, Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead and London.Google Scholar
Charles, N. and Kerr, M. (1987), ‘Just the way it is: gender and age differences in family food consumption’, in Brannen, J. and Wilson, G., Give and Take in Families, Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead and London.Google Scholar
Chiappori, P-A. (1988), ‘Rational household labour supply’, Econometrica, 56, 6390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A.S. and Muellbauer, J. (1980), Economics and Consumer Behaviour, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A.S. and Muellbauer, J. (1986), ‘On measuring child costs: with applications to poor countries’, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 720–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Social Security (1990), Households Below Average Income: A Statistical Analysis 1981–87, Government Statistical Service, London.Google Scholar
Dilnot, A.W., Kay, J.A. and Morris, C.N. (1984), The Reform of Social Security, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fiegehen, G., Lansley, P.S. and Smith, A.D. (1977), Poverty and Progress in Britain 1953–73, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fuchs, V.R. (1986), ‘His and hers: gender differences in work and income, 1959–1979’, Journal of Labor Economics, 4, S245–S271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, I. and Haveman, R.H. (1977), Earnings Capacity, Poverty and Inequality, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Gershuny, J. and Miles, I. et al. (1986), ‘Time budgets: preliminary analyses of a national survey’, Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs, 2, 1339.Google Scholar
Gershuny, J., Jones, S. and Godwin, M. (1988), ‘Collection and preliminary analysis of SCEL time budget data’, photocopy, University of Bath, Bath.Google Scholar
Glendinning, C. and Millar, J. (eds) (1987), Women and Poverty in Britain, Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton.Google Scholar
Goodin, R.E. (1988), Reasons for Welfare: the Political Theory of the Welfare State, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronau, R. (1988), ‘Consumption technology and the intrafamily distribution of resources: adult equivalence scales reexamined’, Journal of Political Economy, 96, 11831205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronau, R. (1991), ‘The intrsafamily allocation of goods: how to separate the adult from the child’, Journal of Labor Economics, 9, 207235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddad, L. and Kanbur, R. (1990), ‘How serious is the neglect of intra-household inequality?’, Economic Journal, 100, 866–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, R. and Semerau, P. (1989), ‘Trends in poverty and low income in the Federal Republic of Germany’, presented at the EUROSTAT Seminar on Poverty Statistics in the EC, Noordwijk, NL.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S.P. and Gershuny, J.I. (1989), ‘The distribution of full income in Britain: a research proposal’, photocopy, University of Bath, Bath.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. and Webb, S. (1989), ‘Counting people with low incomes: the impact of recent changes in official statistics’, Fiscal Studies, 10, 6682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, K. and Sumption, J. (1979), Equality, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Layard, R. and Zabalza, A. (1979), ‘Family income distribution: explanation and policy evaluation’, Journal of Political Economy, 87, S133–S161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, E.P. and Michael, R.T. (1986), ‘Estimating the personal distribution of income with adjustment for within-family variation’, Journal of Labor Economics, 4, S216–S244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, E.P. and Michael, R.T. (1988), Allocation of Income Within the Household, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Mack, J. and Lansley, S. (1985), Poor Britain, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Mayer, S.E. and Jencks, C. (1989), ‘Poverty and the distribution of material hardship’, Journal of Human Resources, 24, 88114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, J. and Glendinning, C. (1987), ‘Invisible women, invisible poverty’, in Glendinning, C. and Millar, J. (eds), Women and Poverty in Britain, Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton.Google Scholar
Millar, J. and Glendinning, C. (1989), ‘Gender and poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 18, 363–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, J. (1983), ‘The allocation of money and the structuring of inequality within marriage’, Sociological Review, 31, 237–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, J. (1989), Money and Marriage, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piachaud, D. (1982), ‘Patterns of income and expenditure within families’, Journal of Social Policy, 11, 469482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piachaud, D. (1987a), ‘Problems in the definition and measurement of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 16, 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piachaud, D. (1987b). ‘The distribution of income and work’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3, 4161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piachaud, D. (1988), ‘Poverty in Britain 1899 to 1983’, Journal of Social Policy, 17, 335–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, S. (1988), ‘Direct and indirect measures of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 17, 351–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawhill, I.V. (1988), ‘Poverty in the US: why is it so persistent?’, Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 10731119.Google Scholar
Seidl, C. (1988), ‘Poverty measurement: a survey’, in Bös, D., Rose, M. and Seidl, C. (eds), Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1973), On Economic Inequality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1984), ‘Rights and capabilities’, in Resources, Values and Development, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, J.D. (1986), ‘Comment on Lazear and Michael’, Journal of Labor Economics, 4, S240–S244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, P. (1979), Poverty in the United Kingdom, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickery, C. (1977), ‘The time-poor: a new look at poverty’, Journal of Human Resources, 12, 2748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogler, C. (1989), ‘Labour market change and patterns of financial allocation within households’, ESRC/SCELI Working Paper 12, Nuffield College, Oxford.Google Scholar
Weale, A. (1983), Political Theory and Social Policy, Macmillan Press, London and Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, F. (1988), ‘A non-cooperative model of family decision making’, TIDI Discussion Paper 125, ST/ICERD, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
Young, M. (1952), ‘Distribution of income within the family’, British Journal of Sociology, 3, 305–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar