Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:52:37.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Control Theories of Social Policy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Joan Higgins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept of social control is crucial in explaining both the growth of social policies and their effects. It raises important questions about the legitimacy of state intervention, the maintenance of order and the protection of individual freedom. The term is widely used in the social policy literature but there have been few attempts to define it or to explore its various meanings and connotations. The aim of this article is to examine some of these issues. It begins with an account of the growth of social control theories focusing particularly upon recent developments in Marxist thought and the literature on the ‘urban crisis’ and ‘radical social work’. The second and third sections of the article explore the different usages of the notion of social control and evaluate some of the main propositions of social control theories of social policy.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1980 , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Saville, John, ‘The Welfare State: An Historical Approach’, New Reasoner, 3 (1957–1958), 25.Google Scholar

2 Ibid. p. 7.

3 Ibid. p. 8.

4 Ibid. p. 10.

5 Ibid. p. 25.

6 Ibid. p. 24.

7 O'Connor, James, The Fiscal Crisis of the State, St Martin's Press, New York, 1973, p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Ibid. p. 6.

9 Ibid. p. 7.

10 Ibid.

11 Ibid.

12 Ibid. p. 163.

13 Ibid. p. 165.

14 Ibid. p. 167.

15 Gough, Ian, ‘State Expenditure in Advanced Capitalism’, New Left Review, 92 (1975), 65.Google Scholar

16 Ibid. p. 68.

17 Ibid. p. 75.

18 Ibid. p. 76.

19 See George, Vic and Wilding, Paul, Ideology and Social Welfare, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1976Google Scholar; Mishra, Ramesh, Society and Social Policy, Macmillan, London, 1977Google Scholar; and Gough, op. cit.

20 Alcaly, Roger and Mermelstein, David, The Fiscal Crisis of American Cities, Vintage Books, New York, 1977, pp. 19–23.Google Scholar

21 Ibid. p. 26.

22 Castells, Manuel, The Urban Question, Edward Arnold, London, 1977, p. 382.Google Scholar

23 English translation of an extract from Zwiedineck-Südenhorst, Otto von, Sozialpolitik, B. G. Teubner, Leipzig and Berlin, 1911Google Scholar – ‘Social Policy and its Manifestations’, in Cahnman, Werner J. and Schmitt, Carl M., ‘The Concept of Social Policy (Sozialpolitik)’, Journal of Social Policy, 8:1 (1979), 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 See Frances Piven, Fox and Cloward, Richard, Regulating the Poor, Tavistock Publications, London, 1972Google Scholar; Bridges, Lee, ‘The Ministry of Internal Security: British Urban Policy 1968–74’, Race and Class, 26:4 (1975)Google Scholar; and Higgins, Joan, The Poverty Business: Britain and America, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1978.Google Scholar

25 Bridges, op. cit. p. 375.

26 Home Office, Experiments in Social Policy and their Evaluation, mimeographed report of an Anglo-American conference held in Ditchley Park, Oxfordshire, 10 1969.Google Scholar

27 Rein, Martin, Social Policy: Issues of Choice and Change, Random House, New York, 1970, p. 140.Google Scholar

28 Sinfield, Adrian, Which Way for Social Work?. Fabian Tract 393, Fabian Society, London, 1969, p. 10.Google Scholar

29 Deacon, Bob, ‘Perspectives for Case-Con’, Case-Con, 7 (1972), 3.Google Scholar

30 Popplestone, Gerald, ‘Who is being Radical?’, Case-Con, 7 (1972), 14.Google Scholar

31 See Ryan, William, Blaming the Victim, Orbach and Chambers, London, 1971.Google Scholar

32 Popplestone, op. cit.

33 Laurie, Peter, Meet your Friendly Social System, Hutchinson, London, 1974, p. 72.Google Scholar

34 Wootton, Barbara, ‘Daddy Knows Best’, Twentieth Century, 10 1959, p. 249.Google Scholar

35 See Cannan, Crescy, ‘Social Workers: Training and Professionalism’, in Pateman, T. (ed.), Countercourse, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1972Google Scholar; Pearson, Geoffrey, ‘Making Social Workers: Bad Promises and Good Omens’, in Bailey, Roy and Brake, Mike (eds), Radical Social Work, Edward Arnold, London, 1975Google Scholar; and Halmos, Paul, The Personal and the Political, Hutchinson, London, 1978.Google Scholar

36 Pearson, Geoffrey, ‘Social Work as the Privatized Solution to Public Ills’, British Journal of Social Work, 3:2 (1973), 209.Google Scholar

37 See Lees, Ray, Politics and Social Work, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1972.Google Scholar

38 Bailey and Brake, op. cit. p. 8.

39 Corrigan, Paul and Leonard, Peter, Social Work Practice under Capitalism: A Marxist Approach, Macmillan, London, 1978, p. 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 Ibid.

41 Ibid. p. 150.

42 See Wilson, Elizabeth, Women and the Welfare State, Tavistock Publications, London, 1977Google Scholar; and Land, Hilary, ‘Who Cares for the Family?’, Journal of Social Policy, 7:3 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 Piven and Cloward, op. cit. p. xiii.

44 Ibid. p. 276.

45 Arnstein, Sherry, ‘A Ladder of Citizen Participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 07 1969, p. 217.Google Scholar

46 O'Connor, op. cit. p. 7.

47 Gouldner, Alvin, The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology, Heinemann, London, 1971, pp. 81–2.Google Scholar

48 Sinfield, Adrian, ‘Analyses in the Social Division of Welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 7:2 (1978), 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49 Ibid. p. 139.

50 Titmuss, Richard, ‘Industrialization and the Family’, in Titmuss, Richard, Essays on the Welfare State, third edition, Allen and Unwin, London, 1976, pp. 117–18.Google Scholar

51 Titmuss, Richard, ‘War and Social Policy’Google Scholar, in Titmuss, , Essays on the Welfare State, p. 86.Google Scholar

52 Titmuss, Richard, ‘The Relationship between Social Security Programmes and Social Service Benefits: An Overview’, in Titmuss, Richard, Commitment to Welfare, first edition, Allen and Unwin, London, 1968, p. 62.Google Scholar

53 Titmuss, Richard, The Gift Relationship, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1973, p. 253.Google Scholar

54 Mishra, op. cit. p. 29.

55 Weale, Albert, ‘Paternalism and Social Policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 7:2 (1978), 157–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

56 Quoted in Laurie, op. cit. p. 72.

57 North, Maurice, The Secular Priests, Allen and Unwin, London, 1972, pp. 291–2.Google Scholar

58 Pearson, , ‘Making Social Workers’, p. 130.Google Scholar

59 Ibid. p. 132.

60 Janowitz, Morris, Social Control of the Welfare State, Elsevier, New York, 1976, p. xi.Google Scholar

61 See Judge, Ken, Rationing Social Services, Heinemann, London, 1978Google Scholar; Parker, Roy, ‘Social Administration and Scarcity’, Social Work, 04 1967Google Scholar; Parker, Roy, ‘Charging for the Social Services’, Journal of Social Policy, 5:4 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Rees, A. M., ‘Access to the Personal Health and Social Services’, Social and Economic Administration, 6:1 (1972).Google Scholar

62 See Reddin, Mike, ‘Universality and Selectivity’, in Robson, W. A. and Crick, B., The Future of the Social Services, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1970.Google Scholar

63 See Hall, A. S., The Point of Entry, Allen and Unwin, London, 1974.Google Scholar

64 See Rieff, Robert, ‘The Control of Knowledge: The Power of the Helping Professions’, Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 10:3 (1974).Google Scholar

65 Titmuss, Richard, ‘The Social Division of Welfare’Google Scholar, in Titmuss, , Essays on the Welfare State.Google Scholar

66 Higgins, Joan, ‘Regulating the Poor Revisited’, Journal of Social Policy, 7:2 (1978).Google Scholar

67 Lees, op. cit. p. 79.

68 Ibid. p. 78.