Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:36:42.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Start Up and Sustainability: Marketisation and the Social Enterprise Investment Fund in England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2012

KELLY HALL ,
PETE ALCOCK  and
ROSS MILLAR
KELLY HALL
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in Sociology, School of Social Sciences, University of Northampton, Park Campus, NN2 7AL email: kelly.hall@northampton.ac.uk
PETE ALCOCK*
Affiliation:
Professor of Social Policy and Administration, Director ESRC Third Sector Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Park House, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham, B15 2RT
ROSS MILLAR
Affiliation:
Research Fellow, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Park House, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham, B15 2RT email: r.millar@bham.ac.uk
*
email: p.c.alcock@bham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the end of the last century governments in many western welfare regimes have been keen to promote the marketisation of public service delivery. This requires changes in the supply of, and demand for, alternative providers in this market, and in particular for many governments this has included third sector providers. This article examines the attempt by the UK Labour government to promote the supply of social enterprises in the market for health and social care services in England, through the Social Enterprise Investment Fund (SEIF), introduced in 2007. The article reports on research evaluating the effectiveness of the SEIF, employing a ‘theories of change’ approach, drawing on a mix of administrative and survey data, qualitative interviews and case studies. The research found that although the SEIF had significant benefits in supporting the start up and growth of organisations, its contribution to their longer-term sustainability was more mixed as most were dependent on grants as a main source of income and were not in a position to compete for public sector contracts. This suggests that there may be limits to the role that public investment can play in such market making.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 733 - 749
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addicott, R. (2011), Social Enterprise in Health Care: Promoting Organisational Autonomy and Staff Engagement, London: The Kings Fund.Google Scholar
Alcock, P., Brannelly, T. and Ross, L. (2004), Formality or Flexibility? Voluntary Sector Contracting in Social Care and Health, London: National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) and the Countryside Agency.Google Scholar
Alcocks, P., Millar, R., Hall, K., Lyon, F., Nicholls, A. and Gabriel, M. (forthcoming), Start Up and Growth: National Evaluation of the Social Enterprise Investment Fund (SEIF), Report to the Department of Health Policy Research Programme.Google Scholar
Billis, D. (2010), ‘From welfare bureaucracies to welfare hybrids’, in Billis, D. (ed.), Hybrid Organisations and the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birckmayer, J. D. and Weiss, C. H. (2000), ‘Theory-based evaluation practice: what do we learn?’, Evaluation Review, 24: 4, 407–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmel, E. and Harlock, J. (2008), ‘Instituting the “third sector” as a governable terrain: partnership, performance and procurement in the UK’, Policy and Politics, 36: 2, 155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, T., Brown, J. and Crow, R. (2008), ‘Entering a brave new world? An assessment of third sector readiness to tender for the delivery of public services in the United Kingdom’, Policy Studies, 29: 1, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J., Kane, D., Wilding, K. and Bass, P. (2012), The UK Civil Society Almanac 2012, London: National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO).Google Scholar
Connell, J. and Kubisch, A. (1998), ‘Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiative: progress, prospects and problems’, in Fulbright-Anderson, K., Kubsich, A. and Connell, J. (eds.), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Vol. 2, Theory, Measurement and Analysis, Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
Dart, R. (2004), ‘The legitimacy of social enterprise’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14: 4, 411–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dees, J. G. and Anderson, B. B. (2003), ‘Sector bending: blurring lines between nonprofit and for profit’, Society, May/June 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Trade and Industry (DTI) (2002), Social Enterprise: A Strategy for Success, London: DTI.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2009), Transforming Health and Social Care: The Social Enterprise Investment Fund, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2010), Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2011), Liberating the NHS: Greater Choice and Control – Government Response, Extending Patient Choice of Provider (Any Qualified Provider), London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Eikenberry, A. (2009), ‘Refusing the market: a democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38: 4, 582–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eikenberry, A. and Kluver, J. (2004), ‘The marketisation of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk?’, Public Administration Review, 64: 2, 132–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, T., Humphrey, C., Hughes, J., Macfarlane, F., Butler, C. and Pawson, R. (2009), ‘How do you modernize a health service? A realist evaluation of whole-scale transformation in London’, Milbank Quarterly, 87: 2, 391–416.Google Scholar
Haugh, H. and Kitson, M. (2007), ‘The Third Way and the third sector: New Labour's economic policy and the social economy’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31: 6, 973–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treasury, HM (2002), The Role of the Voluntary and Community Sector in Service Delivery: A Cross Cutting Review, London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
Kerlin, J. and Pollak, T. (2010), ‘Nonprofit commercial revenue: a replacement for declining government grants and contributions?’, American Review of Public Administration, 41: 6, 686–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, F., Gabriel, M. and Millar, R. (2010), The Social Enterprise Investment Fund, Phase One: Scoping, Review and Methodology Development, Third Sector Research Centre and Health Services Management Centre, http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=sMTQx4DnXYM%3d&tabid=757.Google Scholar
Lyon, F. and Ramsden, M. (2006), ‘Developing fledgling social enterprises? A study of the support required and means of delivering it’, Social Enterprise Journal, 2: 1, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan, R. (2007), ‘Understanding the idea of “grant dependency” in the voluntary and community sector’, People, Place and Policy Online, 1: 1, 30–8.Google Scholar
Macmillan, R. (2010), The Third Sector Delivering Public Services: An Evidence Review, Working Paper 20, Third Sector Research Centre, http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/Publications/tabid/500/Default.aspx.Google Scholar
Margetts, H., Six, P. and Hood, C. (2010)), Paradoxes of Modernization: Unintended Consequences Of Public Policy Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmot, M. (2010), Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review, London: The Marmot Review, http://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/Content/FileManager/pdf/fairsocietyhealthylives.pdf.Google Scholar
McKay, S., Moro, D., Teasdale, S. and Clifford, D. (2011), The Marketisation of Charities in England and Wales, Working Paper 69, Third Sector Research Centre, http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/Publications/tabid/500/Default.aspx.Google Scholar
Milbourne, L. (2009), ‘Remodelling the third sector: advancing collaboration or competition in community-based initiatives?’, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 2, 277–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Miller, R. and Millar, R. (2011), Social Enterprise Spin-Outs from the English Health Service: A Right to Request but Was Anyone Listening?, Working Paper 52, Third Sector Research Centre, http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/Research/SocialEnterprise/Arighttorequest/tabid/778/Default.aspx.Google Scholar
National Audit Office (NAO) (2011), Establishing Social Enterprises under the Right to Request Programme, London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2010), ‘Record number of businesses close in 2009’, News Release, 1 December 2010, http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/index.html?nscl=Changes±to±Businesses.Google Scholar
Office of the Third Sector (OTS) (2006a), Social Enterprise Action Plan: Scaling New Heights, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Office of the Third Sector (OTS) (2006b), Partnership in Public Services: An Action Plan for Third Sector Involvement, London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G. and Walshe, K. (2005), ‘Realist review − a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10: 1, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peattie, K. and Morley, A. (2008), Social Enterprises: Diversity and Dynamics, Contexts and Contributions, a Research Monograph, Cardiff: ESRC Centre for Business Relationships.Google Scholar
Pharoah, C., Scott, D. and Fisher, A. (2004), Social Enterprise in the Balance: Challenges for the Voluntary Sector, West Malling: Charities Aid Foundation.Google Scholar
Packwood, D. (2007), Commissioning, Contracting and Service Delivery of Children's Services in the Voluntary and Community Sector, VCS Engage.Google Scholar
Peredo, A. M. and McLean, M. (2006), ‘Social entrepreneurship: a critical review of the concept’, Journal of World Business, 41: 1, 56–65.Google Scholar
Powell, M. (ed.) (2002), Evaluating New Labour's Welfare Reforms, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Powell, M. (ed.) (2007), Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare, Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M., Millar, R., Mulla, A., Brown, H., Fewtrell, C., McLeod, H., Goodwin, N., Dixon, A. and Naylor, C. (2011), Comparative Case Studies of Health Reform in England, Final Report, London: Department of Health Policy Research Programme.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1993), ‘The marketization of welfare: changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state’, Social Service Review, 67: 1, 16–39.Google Scholar
SQW Consulting (2007), Research on Access to Finance: Report to the Office of the Third Sector, London: SQW Consulting.Google Scholar
Sunley, P. and Pinch, S. (2011), ‘Financing social enterprise: social bricolage or evolutionary entrepreneurialism?’, Paper presented at 3rd International Social Innovation Research Conference, London Southbank University, London, 12–13 September 2011.Google Scholar
Teasdale, S. (2010), What's in a Name? The Construction of Social Enterprise, Working Paper 46, Third Sector Research Centre, http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/Publications/tabid/500/Default.aspx.Google Scholar
Tribal (2009), Social Enterprise Pathfinder Programme Evaluation, Final Report, Newchurch: Tribal.Google Scholar
Wells, P., Chadwick-Coule, T., Dayson, C. and Morgan, G. (2010), Futurebuilders Evaluation, Final Report Sheffield Hallam University (CRESR).Google Scholar