Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:12:12.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statutory Sick Pay and the Control of Sickness Absence*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Hartley Dean  and
Peter Taylor-Gooby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The shift from national insurance to employer administered, state funded Statutory Sick Pay has been discussed in terms of the privatisation of social security and its impact upon the living standards of sick-absent employees. This paper reports a survey of employers’ perceptions of the change. Many employers have seen the introduction of the scheme as an opportunity to extend control of sickness absence among workers. The new regime may be better understood as part of a process whereby the government and employers link together to manage labour in the interests of capital, rather than as the privatisation of one aspect of social security.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 47 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alliance of Small Firms and Self Employed People (1980). Time Bomb Ticks under Employment, London.Google Scholar
Brown, J. and Small, S. (1985), Occupational Benefits as Social Security, Policy Studies Institute. London.Google Scholar
Chadwick, K. (1982), ‘A prescription for statutory sick pay and the supplementary benefits’. Personnel Management, 03.Google Scholar
Child Poverty Action Group (1980), No Way to Treat the Sick, CPAG. London.Google Scholar
Confederation of British Industries (1980). Why the Government Needs to Think Again: CBI Submission on Government Proposals Set Out in Cmnd 7864. CBI. London.Google Scholar
Conservative Party (1983), The Conservative Party Manifesto, 1983, Conservative Central Office. London.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1980), Income During Initial Sickness: A New Strategy, Cmnd 7864, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1985), Reform of Social Security. Cmnd 9517. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Disability Alliance (1980). The Wrong Strategy: the Disability Alliance's Reponse to the Government Green Paper on Income During Initial Sickness, London.Google Scholar
Disability Alliance, Leicester Rights Centre and Leicester City Council (1986), Statutory Sick Pay: A Failure of Privatisation in Social Security, Leicester.Google Scholar
Disney, R. (1987), ‘Statutory sick pay: an appraisal’. Fiscal Studies. 58–76.Google Scholar
Engineering Employers Federation (1981), Federation Response to Consultative Document ‘Compensating Employers for Statutory Sick Pay’, London.Google Scholar
Golding, P. and Middleton, S. (1982), Images of Welfare, Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
House of Commons (1985), Tenth Report of the Committee of Public Accounts, Statutory Sick Pay, HC 176, Session 1984/85, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Incomes Data Services (1982–1983). Sick Pay Bulletin. No. 1 and Nos. 8–14, IDS, London.Google Scholar
Industrial Relations Services (1985), ‘Occupational Sick Pay’, Industrial Relations Review and Report, No. 340. 2–11: No. 344, 7–15.Google Scholar
Labour Research Department (1980), Sick Pay: A Negotiator's Guide (1980 edition), LRD, London.Google Scholar
Labour Research Department (1985), Sick Pay: A Negotiator's Guide (1985 edition), LRD, London.Google Scholar
Labour Research Department (1987). Bargaining Report, No. 64.Google Scholar
Grand, J. Le (1985), ‘Comment on inequality, redistribution and recession’, Journal of Social Policy, 14:3.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. (1982). ‘The privatisation of sickness benefit’, Industrial Law Journal, 11:4, 245–254.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, S. (1980), ‘Sickness—who pays?’, Low Pay Review. October.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, S. and Byrne, D. (1988), ‘Social security: from state insurance to private uncertainty’, in Brenton, M. and Ungerson, C. (eds). Year Book of Social Policy 1987–88, Longman, London.Google Scholar
National Federation of Self Employed and Small Businesses (1980), Income During Initial Sickness: A Prescription for Disaster, NFSESB, London.Google Scholar
OPCS (1986), General Household Survey Report No. 14, 1984. HMSO. London.Google Scholar
Papadakis, E. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (1987), The Private Provision of Public Welfare. Wheatsheaf, Brighton.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1985). ‘Who's fiddling: fraud and abuse’, in Ward, S. (ed.), DHSS in Crisis, CPAG, London.Google Scholar
Social Security Policy Inspectorate (1985), Enquiry into Statutory Sick Pay, DHSS, London.Google Scholar
Society of Civil and Public Servants (1980), Your Sickness Benefit Under Attack, SCPS, London.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Dean, H. (1989), The Unintended Consequences of Statutory Sick Pay, Report to the Nuffleld Foundation upon the findings of research conducted under Grant Ref:17/87, University of Kent, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Lakeman, S. (1988), ‘Back to the future: statutory sick pay, citizenship and social class’, Journal of Social Policy, 17:1, 23–40.Google Scholar
Trades Union Congress (1980), Income During Initial Sickness—TUC Comments, TUC, London.Google Scholar
Trades Union Congress (1984). Employers' Statutory Sick Pay: Results of TUC Monitoring Exercise, TUC, London.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. (1989). ‘Family food systems, preventive health and dietary change: a policy to increase the health divide’. Journal of Social Policy, 18:2. 167–85.Google Scholar