Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:52:33.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxes, Expenditures and Income Distribution in Switzerland*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Robert E. Leu ,
Rene L. Frey  and
Brigitte Buhmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we analyse the impact of government policies on income distribution and poverty in Switzerland. First, we give an overview of the Swiss welfare system and provide an estimate of the poverty problem in this country. Second, we discuss some major problems of fiscal incidence analysis. Third, we examine the impact of taxes and expenditures on income distribution in Switzerland using a budget incidence approach. The analysis is based mainly on the first nationwide representative Income and Wealth Survey 1980 conducted by the authors. The major findings are the following:

1 The government budget, including the social security system, has a significant redistributive effect which is due mainly to expenditures rather than to taxation.

2 Direct taxes reduce income inequality, measured by the Gini coefficient; indirect taxes increase it. The net effect of all taxes is to reduce income inequality.

3 The redistributive effect of social welfare expenditures is larger than that of other government expenditures.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 1985 , pp. 341 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aaron, H.J. and M.C. McGuire (1970), ‘Public goods and income distribution’, Econometrica, 38:6, 907–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. (1976), ‘On the measurement of inequality’, Journal of Economic Theory, 2:3, 244–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. (1983), The Economics of Inequality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brennan, G. (1981), ‘The attribution of public goods benefits’, Public Finance, 36:3, 347–73.Google Scholar
Browning, E.K. and W.R. Johnson (1979), The Distribution of the Tax Burden, American Enterprise Institute, Washington.Google Scholar
Bürgisser-Peters, P.(1982), Verteilungswirkungender staatlichen Altersversorge in der Schweiz, Schulthess, Zurich.Google Scholar
Cowell, F.A. (1977), Measuring Inequality, Deddington, Philip Allan, London.Google Scholar
Dahlrymple, R. (1980), The Sensitivity of Measured Comprehensive Inequality to Aggregation, Reranking and Underreporting, PhD Thesis, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Danziger, S., van der Gaag, J., Smolensky, E. and Taussig, M. (1982), ‘Income transfers and the economic status of the elderly’. Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Frey, R.L. and Leu, R.E. (1983), ‘Unverteilung über den Staatshaushalt: Die personelle Budgetinzidenz der Schweiz 1977’, Schweiz, Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 166:1, 1–21.Google Scholar
Gillespie, I.W. (1965), ‘Effects of public expenditures on the distribution of income’, in Musgrave, R.A. (ed.), Essays in Fiscal Federalism, Brooking Institution, Washington, pp.122–86.Google Scholar
Gillespie, I.W. (1980a), The Redistribution of Income in Canada, Gage Publishing, Toronto.Google Scholar
Gillespie, I.W. (1980b), ‘Taxes, expenditures and the redistribution of income in Canada, 1951–1977’, in Economic Council of Canada: Reflections on Canadian Incomes, Minister of Supply and Services, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Grüske, K.D. (1985), ‘Redistributive effects of the integrated financial and social budget in West Germany’, in Terny, G. and Culyer, A.J. (eds), Public Finance and Social Policy, Wayne State University Press, Detroit, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Kakwani, N.C and Podder, N. (1973),.‘On the estimation of Lorenz curves from grouped observations’, International Economic Review, 14:2, 278–92.Google Scholar
Lazear, E.P. and R.T. Michael (1980), ‘Family size and the distribution of real per capita income’, American Economic Review, 70:1, 91–107.Google Scholar
Lebergott, S. (1976) The American Economy: Income, Wealth and Want, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Le, J. Grand (1982), The Strategy of Equality: Redistribution and the Social Services, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Leu, R.E. and R.L. Frey (1985a), ‘Distributional impacts of government policies in Switzerland’, Government and Policy, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Leu, R.E. and R.L. Frey (1985b), ‘Budget incidence, demographic change and health policy in Switzerland’, in Terny, G. and Culyer, A.J. (eds.), Public Finance and Social Policy, Wayne State University Press, Detroit, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R.A., Case, K.E. and Leonard, H. (1974), ‘The distribution of fiscal burdens and benefits’, Public Finance Quarterly, 2:3, 259–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normand, D., Hawley, G. and I.W. Gillespie (1983), ‘In search of the changing distribution of income during the post-war period in Canada and the United States’, Public Finance, 38:2, 267–81.Google Scholar
O'Higgins, M. and Ruggles, P. (1981), ‘The distribution of public expenditures and taxes among households in the United Kingdom’, Review of Income and Wealth, 27:3, 298–326.Google Scholar
Pechman, J.A. and Okner, B.A. (1974), Who Bears the Tax Burden?, Brookings Institution, Washington.Google Scholar
Pollak, R. and Wales, T. (1979), ‘Welfare comparisons and equivalence scales’, American Economic Review, 69: 216–21.Google Scholar
Prest, A.R. (1968), ‘The budget and Interpersonal distribution’, Public Finance, 23:1–2, 80–98.Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. and Smolensky, E. (1977), Public Expenditures, Taxes and the Distribution of Income, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Shoup, C.S. (1969), Public Finance, 20:3/4, 460–81.Google Scholar
van, J. der Gaag and Smolensky, E. (1982), ‘True household equivalence scales and characteristics of the poor in the United States’, Institute for Research on Poverty Reprint No. 453, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar