Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:43:18.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Welfare Regimes and Global Cities: A Missing Link in the Comparative Analysis of Welfare States?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2012

JOHN HUDSON
JOHN HUDSON*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy & Social Work, University of York, York, United Kingdom, YO10 5DD e-mail: john.hudson@york.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ‘welfare modelling business’ has been at the heart of comparative social policy analysis but debate has largely proceeded on the basis that coherent national welfare states exist. This assumption was always problematic but globalisation processes have added a further dimension to this debate. In particular, geographers and sociologists have pointed to the increasing power of global cities that act as co-ordinating hubs for the global economy. Though residing in nation states, these cities have a special status flowing from their central role in the global economy. Little attempt has been made to explore the implications of these cities for welfare regimes and welfare regime analysis. This paper addresses this under explored issue and suggests there are strong overlaps between global city types and welfare types.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 455 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, P. (1999), ‘The welfare modelling business’, Social Policy and Administration, 33: 394–415.Google Scholar
Abrahamson, P. (2011), ‘The welfare modelling business revisited’, in Hwang, G. (ed.), New Welfare States in East Asia: Global Challenges and Restructuring, London: Edward Elgar, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
Bambra, C. (2004), ‘The worlds of welfare: illusory and gender-blind?’, Social Policy and Society, 3: 201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonache, J. (2006), ‘The compensation of expatriates: a review and a future research agenda’, in Stahl, G. and Björkman, I. (eds.), The Handbook in International Human Resource Management, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (1997), ‘Classifying welfare states: a two-dimension approach’, Journal of Social Policy, 26: 351–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, D., Schuker, R. and Claus, L. (2009), International Human Resource Management: Policies and Practices for Mulitnational Enterprises (third edition), Abigdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2000), The Rise of the Network Society (second edition), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2010), The Rise of the Network Society (second edition with revised preface), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Castles, F. (2002), ‘Developing new measures of welfare state change and reform’, European Journal of Political Research, 41: 613–41.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. (2005), ‘Welfare states as nation states: some conceptual reflections’, Social Policy and Society, 4: 407–15.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1997), ‘Hybrid or unique? The Japanese welfare state between Europe and America’, Journal of European Social Policy, 7: 179–89.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2001), ‘Social protection and the formation of skills: a reinterpretation of the welfare state’, in Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Competitive Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
European Cities Against Child Poverty Network (2008), Policy Bulletin, April 2008, www.againstchildpoverty.co.uk.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (1996), ‘The southern model of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6: 17–37.Google Scholar
Goodway, N. (2008a), ‘WPP may quit UK to cut its tax’, Evening Standard, http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-23481166-wpp-may-quit-uk-to-cut-its-tax.do.Google Scholar
Goodway, N. (2008b), ‘UBM joins the exodus from UK’, Evening Standard, http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-business/article-23480941-ubm-joins-the-exodus-from-uk.do.Google Scholar
Goodin, R., Headey, R., Muffels, R. and Dirven, H. J. (1999), The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gootman, E. (2007), ‘City will help pension plans build housing for teachers’, New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/05/nyregion/05housing.html?_r=1&ref=education.Google Scholar
Greer, S. (2010), ‘How does decentralisation affect the welfare state? Territorial politics and the welfare state in the UK and US’, Journal of Social Policy, 39: 181–201.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1966), The World Cities, London: Heinnemann.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (2006), Plenary Lecture at the Social Policy Association Annual Conference, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Henrard, V. (2011), Income Inequality and Public Expenditure on Social Policy in Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Civic Exchange.Google Scholar
Treasury, HM (2008), Public Expenditure: Statistical Analyses, HC 489, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. (2006), ‘Inequality and the knowledge economy: running to stand still?’, Social Policy and Society, 5: 207–222.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. and Kühner, S. (2009), ‘Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 1: 34–46.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. and Kühner, S. (2010), ‘Beyond the dependent variable problem: the methodological challenges of capturing productive and protective dimensions of social policy’, Social Policy and Society, 9: 2, 167–79.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. and Kühner, S. (2012), ‘Analysing the productive and protective dimensions of welfare: looking beyond the OECD’, Social Policy and Administration, 46: 35–60.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. and Lowe, S. (2009), Understanding the Policy Process, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Korcelli-Olejniczak, E. (2007), ‘Berlin and Warsaw: in search of a new role in the European urban system’, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22: 51–68.Google Scholar
Muller, S. (1995), International Organizations and their Host States: Aspects of their Legal Relationship, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
National Statistics (2007), Focus on London, London: National Statistics.Google Scholar
Prince, R. (2009), ‘Tens of thousands to go into exile following 50p tax hike in Budget’, Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/budget/5208894/Tens-of-thousands-to-go-into-exile-following-50p-tax-hike-in-Budget.html.Google Scholar
Prynn, J. (2009), ‘London will pay price for this Budget, says Mayor’, Evening Standard, http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/london-will-pay-price-for-this-budget-saysmayor-6772528.html.Google Scholar
Raab, C. (2001), ‘Understanding policy networks: a comment on Marsh and Smith’, Political Studies, 49: 551–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragin, C. (2000), Fuzzy-Set Social Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. (1997), Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham, Open University Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. (2007), ‘Understanding governance: ten years on’, Organization Studies, 28: 1243–64.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. (2010), ‘Boris Johnson calls for Londoners to be exempt from housing benefit cap’, Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/8092146/Boris-Johnson-calls-for-Londoners-to-be-exempt-from-housing-benefit-cap.html.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. (1991), The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. (2001), The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (second edition), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. (2005), ‘The global city: introducing a concept’, Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11: 27–43.Google Scholar
Save the Children Denmark (2009), Børnefattigdom I Danmark 2002–2006, Copenhagen: Save the Children Denmark.Google Scholar
Save the Children Sweden (2003), Child Poverty in Sweden: Annual Report 2003, Stockholm: Save the Children Sweden.Google Scholar
Schwartz, H. (2003), ‘Globalisation/welfare: what's the preposition? And, or, versus, with?’, in Ellison, N. et al. (eds.), Social Policy Review, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. (no date), ‘A brief guide to quantitative data collection at GaWC, 1997–2001’, http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/guide.html.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. (2005), ‘Leading world cities: empirical evaluations of urban nodes in multiple networks’, Urban Studies, 42: 1593–608.Google Scholar
Toynbee, P. (2003), Hard Work, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Habitat, UN (2008), State of the World's Cities 2008/9, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. (2010), ‘HSBC “under pressure” to exit London’, Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/8113809/HSBC-under-pressure-to-exit-London.htm.Google Scholar