Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:09:25.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: Towards an analysis of Buddhist secular grammars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Notes on post-secular society’, New Perspectives Quarterly 25, 4 (2008): 1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Foxeus, Niklas, ‘The Buddha was a devoted nationalist: Buddhist nationalism, ressentiment, and defending Buddhism in Myanmar’, Religion 49, 4 (2019): 661–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gravers, Mikael, ‘Anti-Muslim Buddhist nationalism in Burma and Sri Lanka: Religious violence and globalized imaginaries of endangered identities’, Contemporary Buddhism 16, 1 (2015): 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schonthal, Benjamin and Walton, Matthew J., ‘The (new) Buddhist nationalisms? Symmetries and specificities in Sri Lanka and Myanmar’, Contemporary Buddhism 17, 1 (2016): 81115CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Schonthal, Benjamin, ‘Securing the sasana through law: Buddhist constitutionalism and Buddhist-interest litigation in Sri Lanka’, Modern Asian Studies 50, 6 (2016): 19662008CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schonthal, Benjamin, ‘Making the Muslim Other in Myanmar and Sri Lanka’, in Islam and the state in Myanmar: Muslim–Buddhist relations and the politics of belonging, ed. Crouch, Melissa (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 234–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Casanova, José, ‘The secular and secularisms’, Social Research: An International Quarterly 76, 4 (2009): 1049–66Google Scholar. See also, Braidotti, Rosi et al. , ‘Introductory notes’, in Transformations of religion and the public sphere: Postsecular publics, ed. Braidotti, Rosi, Blagaard, B., Graauw, T., Midden, E. and de Graauw, T. (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 114Google Scholar.

5 Schirin Amir-Moazami, ‘Konfiguration des Säkularen. Einblicke in die kritische Säkularismusforschung’, 9 May 2017, Trafo: Blog for Transregional Research; https://trafo.hypotheses.org/6654 (last accessed 30 Jan. 2021).

6 Agrama, Hussein Ali, Questioning secularism: Islam, sovereignty, and the rule of law in modern Egypt (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Asad, Talal, Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Asad, Talal, Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993)Google Scholar.

8 Mas, Ruth, ‘The red thread of Christianity’, ReOrient: The Journal of Critical Muslim Studies 1, 1 (2015): 51–60Google Scholar; Anidjar, Gil, ‘The idea of an anthropology of Christianity’, Interventions 11, 3 (2009): 367–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Mahmood, Saba, Religious difference in a secular age: A minority report (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A second line of inquiry important for the field is critical studies of religious freedom, which often intersects with the construction of religious minorities. Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers, Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman, Mahmood, Saba and Danchin, Peter G., Politics of religious freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman, Beyond religious freedom: The new global politics of religion (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015)Google Scholar; Berger, Benjamin L., Law's religion: Religious difference and the claims of constitutionalism (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 For example, Josephson, Joseph Ananda, The invention of religion in Japan (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Krämer, Hans Martin, Shimaji mokurai and the reconception of religion and the secular in modern Japan (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thomas, Jolyon Baraka, Faking liberties: Religious freedom in American-occupied Japan (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 For example, Stephens, Julia, Governing Islam: Law, empire, and secularism in modern South Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Iqtidar, Humeira, ‘Colonial secularism and Islamism in North India: A relationship of creativity’, in Religion and the political imagination, ed. Katznelson, Ira and Stedman, Garetz Jones (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 235–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chatterjee, Nandini, The making of Indian secularism: Empire, law and Christianity, 1830–1960 (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; van der Veer, Peter, Imperial encounters: Religion and modernity in India and Britain (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Adcock, C.S., The limits of tolerance: Indian secularism and the politics of religious freedom (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar; Fuerst, Ilyse R. Morgenstein, Indian Muslim minorities and the 1857 rebellion: Religion, rebels and jihad (London: Bloomsbury, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 For the most prominent exception regarding Myanmar, see Turner, Alicia, Saving Buddhism: The impermanence of religion in colonial Burma (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2014)Google Scholar. A short overview article on Thailand has recently been published: Thomas Larsson, ‘Secularisation, secularism, and the Thai state’, in Routledge handbook of contemporary Thailand, ed. Pavin Chachavalpongpun (London: Routledge, 2019), pp. 278–90. Iselin Frydelund has offered critical work on the politics of religious freedom in contemporary Myanmar, and Ben Schonthal on the constitutionalisation of religion in Sri Lanka. See Frydenlund, Iselin, ‘The birth of Buddhist politics of religious freedom in Myanmar’, Journal of Religious and Political Practice 4, 1 (2018): 107–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schonthal, Benjamin, ‘Constitutionalizing religion: The pyrrhic success of religious rights in postcolonial Sri Lanka’, Journal of Law and Religion 29, 3 (2014): 470–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A second panel entitled ‘Theravada Buddhist experiences of secularism in South and Southeast Asia’, at the American Academy of Religion conference in 2018 also explored these issues.

13 I want to thank one of the anonymous reviewers for highlighting this point. See also Borchert, Thomas, ‘Introduction. Theravada Buddhism in colonial contexts’, in Theravada Buddhism in colonial contexts, ed. Borchert, T. (London: Routledge, 2018), pp. 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Pascal, Eva M., ‘Buddhist monks and Christian friars: Religious and cultural exchange in the making of Buddhism’, Studies in World Christianity 22, 1 (2016): 521CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Masuzawa, Tomoko, The invention of world religions: Or, how European universalism was preserved in the language of pluralism (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lopez, Donald S., ‘Introduction’, in Curators of the Buddha: The study of Buddhism under colonialism, ed. Lopez, Donald S. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), pp. 129Google Scholar; Almond, Philip C., The British discovery of Buddhism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 For instance, Adolf Bastian, known as the ‘founder’ of ethnography in Germany, refers to the Hinayana school of Buddhism in his travel account of Siam: Bastian, Adolf, Reisen in Siam im Jahre 1867 (Jena: Hermann Constenoble, 1867)Google Scholar.

17 Bloembergen, Marieke and Eickhoff, Martijn, ‘Exchange and the protection of Java's antiquities: A transnational approach to the problem of heritage in colonial Java’, Journal of Asian Studies 72, 4 (2013): 124CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Skilling, Peter, ed., How Theravāda is Theravāda? Exploring Buddhist identities (Chiang Mai: Silkworm, 2012)Google Scholar; Todd LeRoy Perreira, ‘Whence Theravāda? The modern genealogy of an ancient term’, in ibid., pp. 443–571.

19 Talal Asad, ‘Thinking about religion through Wittgenstein’, paper given at the Makerere Institute of Social Research, May 2020, https://misr.mak.ac.ug/file-download/download/public/1082 (accessed 3 June 2020), p. 29.

21 Conrad, Sebastian, ‘Religion in der globalen Welt’, in 1750–1870. Wege zur modernen Welt, ed. Conrad, Sebastian and Osterhammel, Jürgen (München: C.H. Beck, 2016), pp. 559626Google Scholar.

22 Bénédicte Brac de la Perrière, ‘“Don't say it is religion!” versus “Don't make it look like politics!”: The vicissitudes of secularity in transitional Burma’, paper given at the Association of Asian Studies Annual Conference, Seattle, 2016.