Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:04:14.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ASSOCIATIVITY OF THE MORLEY PRODUCT OF INVARIANT MEASURES IN NIP THEORIES

Part of: Model theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2021

GABRIEL CONANT  and
KYLE GANNON
GABRIEL CONANT
Affiliation:
DPMMS, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE CAMBRIDGE CB3 0WB, UK E-mail: gconant@maths.cam.ac.uk
KYLE GANNON
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES, CA 90095, USA E-mail: gannon@math.ucla.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In light of a gap found by Krupiński, we give a new proof of associativity for the Morley (or “nonforking”) product of invariant measures in NIP theories.

Keywords

NIPKeisler measures

MSC classification

Primary: 03C45: Classification theory, stability and related concepts

Information

Type
Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 1293 - 1300
Check for updates
Copyright
© Association for Symbolic Logic 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Conant, G. and Gannon, K., Remarks on generic stability in independent theories . Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , vol. 171 (2020), no. 2, p. 102736, 20.10.1016/j.apal.2019.102736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, G., Gannon, K. and Hanson, J., Keisler measures in the wild, preprint, 2021, arXiv2103.09137.Google Scholar
Hrushovski, E. and Pillay, A., On NIP and invariant measures . Journal of European Mathematical Society (JEMS) , vol. 13 (2011), no. 4, pp. 1005–1061.10.4171/JEMS/274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrushovski, E., Pillay, A., and Simon, P., Generically stable and smooth measures in NIP theories. Transactions of American Mathematical Society, vol. 365 (2013), no. 5, pp. 2341–2366.10.1090/S0002-9947-2012-05626-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keisler, H.J., Measures and forking . Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , vol. 34 (1987), no. 2, pp. 119–169.10.1016/0168-0072(87)90069-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, P., A Guide to NIP Theories , Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 44, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015.10.1017/CBO9781107415133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starchenko, S., NIP, Keisler measures and combinatorics, no. 390, 2017, Séminaire Bourbaki. Vol. 2015/2016. Exposés 1104–1119, pp. Exp. No. 1114, 303–334.Google Scholar