Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T18:06:36.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MARKOV’S PRINCIPLE AND SUBSYSTEMS OF INTUITIONISTIC ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2019

JOAN RAND MOSCHOVAKIS
JOAN RAND MOSCHOVAKIS*
Affiliation:
PROF. EMERITA OF MATHEMATICS, OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE 721 24TH STREET SANTA MONICA, CA90402, USA E-mail: joan.rand@gmail.comURL: https://www.math.ucla.edu/∼joan/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using a technique developed by Coquand and Hofmann [3] we verify that adding the analytical form MP1: $\forall \alpha (\neg \neg \exists {\rm{x}}\alpha ({\rm{x}}) = 0 \to \exists {\rm{x}}\alpha ({\rm{x}}) = 0)$ of Markov’s Principle does not increase the class of ${\rm{\Pi }}_2^0$ formulas provable in Kleene and Vesley’s formal system for intuitionistic analysis, or in subsystems obtained by omitting or restricting various axiom schemas in specified ways.

Keywords

03F5003F55Markov’s principleconservativityintuitionistic analysis

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 84 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 870 - 876
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Symbolic Logic 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Avigad, J., Interpreting classical theories in constructive ones, this Journal, vol. 65 (2000), pp. 1785–1812.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. and Richman, F., Varieties of Constructive Mathematics, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 97, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.10.1017/CBO9780511565663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coquand, T. and Hofmann, M., A new method for establishing conservativity of classical systems over their intuitionistic version. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, vol. 9 (1999), pp. 323–333.10.1017/S0960129599002844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleene, S. C., Introduction to Metamathematics, van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ, 1952.Google Scholar
Kleene, S. C., Formalized Recursive Functionals and Formalized Realizability, Memoirs, vol. 89, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1969.Google Scholar
Kleene, S. C. and Vesley, R. E., The Foundations of Intuitionistic Mathematics, Especially in Relation to Recursive Functions, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1965.Google Scholar
Vafeiadou, G., Formalizing constructive analysis: A comparison of minimal systems and a study of uniqueness principles, Ph.D. thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 2012.10.12681/eadd/29120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vafeiadou, G., A comparison of minimal systems for constructive analysis, arXiv:1808.000383.Google Scholar