Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:39:48.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variations on a game of Gale (III): remainder strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Marion Scheepers
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83735, USA E-mail: marion@cantor.idbsu.edu
William Weiss
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario K1N9B4, Canada E-mail: weiss@math.toronto.ca

Extract

An infinite set X is given. D. Gale, in correspondence with J. Mycielski, described the following game in which players one and two play an inning per positive integer: In the nth inning one chooses a finite subset Xn of X, and two chooses a point xn from (X1∪ … ∪Xn)\{x1,…,xn−1}. A play

is won by two if . Gale asked whether two could have a winning strategy which depends for each n on knowledge of only the contents of the set

In mathematical terms, is there a function F defined on the collection of finite subsets of X such that:

for every sequence X1, x1, …, Xn, xn,…. where each Xn is a finite subset

of X and for each n

we have

We shall call a strategy of this sort a remainder strategy for two. If there is some finite subset U of X such that F(U)U, then F cannot be a winning remainder strategy for two, because one can defeat F by choosing U each inning. So, when studying remainder strategies for two we may as well assume that for each finite set UX, F(U)U.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Ciesielski, K. and Laver, R., A game of D. Gale in which one of the players has limited memory, Periodica Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 22 (1990), pp. 153158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Erdős, P., Hajnal, A., Matè, A., and Rado, R., Combinatorial set theory: Partition relations for cardinals, North-Holland, 1984.Google Scholar
[3]Jech, T. J., Set theory, Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
[4]Scheepers, M., Variations on a game of Gale (II): Markov strategies, Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 129 (1994), pp. 385396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Shelah, S., Can you take Solovay's inaccessible away?, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 48 (1984), pp. 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar