Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:38:02.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A version of o-minimality for the p-adics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Deirdre Haskell
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts 01610, USA, E-mail: haskell@math.holycross.edu
Dugald Macpherson
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, England, E-mail: pmthdm@amsta.leeds.ac.uk

Extract

In this paper we formulate a notion similar to o-minimality but appropriate for the p-adics. The paper is in a sense a sequel to [11] and [5]. In [11] a notion of minimality was formulated, as follows. Suppose that L, L+ are first-order languages and + is an L+-structure whose reduct to L is . Then + is said to be -minimal if, for every N+ elementarily equivalent to +, every parameterdefinable subset of its domain N+ is definable with parameters by a quantifier-free L-formula. Observe that if L has a single binary relation which in is interpreted by a total order on M, then we have just the notion of strong o-minimality, from [13]; and by a theorem from [6], strong o-minimality is equivalent to o-minimality. If L has no relations, functions, or constants (other than equality) then the notion is just strong minimality.

In [11], -minimality is investigated for a number of structures . In particular, the C-relation of [1] was considered, in place of the total order in the definition of strong o-minimality. The C-relation is essentially the ternary relation which naturally holds on the maximal chains of a sufficiently nice tree; see [1], [11] or [5] for more detail, and for axioms. Much of the motivation came from the observation that a C-relation on a field F which is preserved by the affine group AGL(1,F) (consisting of permutations (a,b) : xax + b, where aF \ {0} and bF) is the same as a non-trivial valuation: to get a C-relation from a valuation ν, put C(x;y,z) if and only if ν(yx) < ν(yz).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Adeleke, S. and Neumann, P. M., Relations related to betweenness: their structure and automorphisms, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, to appear.Google Scholar
[2]Denef, J. and van den Dries, L., p-adic and real subanalytic sets, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 128 (1988), pp. 79138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]van den Dries, L., Dimension of definable sets, algebraic boundedness and henselian fields, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 45 (1989), pp. 189209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]van den Dries, L., Haskell, D., and Macpherson, H. D., One-dimensional p-adic subanalytic sets, in preparation.Google Scholar
[5]Haskell, D. and Macpherson, H. D., Cell decompositions of C-minimal structures, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 66 (1994), pp. 113162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Knight, J., Pillay, A., and Steinhorn, C., Definable sets in ordered structures II, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 295 (1986), pp. 593605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Macintyre, A. J., On ω1-categorical theories of fields, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 70 (1971), pp. 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Macintyre, A. J., On definable subsets of p-adic fields, this Journal, vol. 41 (1976), pp. 605610.Google Scholar
[9]Macintyre, A. J., McKenna, K., and van den Dries, L., Elimination of quantifiers in algebraic structures, Advances in Mathematics, vol. 47 (1983), pp. 7487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Macpherson, H. D., Marker, D., and Steinhorn, C., Weakly o-minimal structures and real closed fields, in preparation.Google Scholar
[11]Macpherson, H. D. and Steinhorn, C., On variants of o-minimality, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, to appear.Google Scholar
[12]Mathews, L., The independence property in unstable algebraic structures I: p-adically closed fields, preprint.Google Scholar
[13]Pillay, A. and Steinhorn, C., Definable sets in ordered structures I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 295 (1986), pp. 565592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Prestel, A. and Roquette, P., Formally p-adic fields, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 1050, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Ribenboim, P., Théorie des valuations, Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, 1967.Google Scholar
[16]Scowcroft, P., More on definable sets of p-adic numbers, this Journal, vol. 53 (1988), pp. 912920.Google Scholar
[17]Scowcroft, P. and van den Dries, L., On the structure of semi-algebraic sets over p-adic fields, this Journal, vol. 53 (1988), pp. 11381164.Google Scholar
[18]Shelah, S., Classification theory and the number of non-isomorphic models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.Google Scholar