Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-04T15:22:28.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Automorphisms of the truth-table degrees are fixed on a cone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Bernard A. Anderson
Bernard A. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Computer, Science and Mathematical Logic, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Malostranské Náměstí 25, 118 00 Prague 1, Czech Republic, E-mail: beraugander@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let Dtt denote the set of truth-table degrees. A bijection π: Dtt → Dtt is an automorphism if for all truth-table degrees x and y we have x ≤tty ⇔ π(x) ≤ttπ(y). We say an automorphism π is fixed on a cone if there is a degree b such that for all x ≥ttb we have π(x) = x. We first prove that for every 2-generic real X we have X′ ≰ttX ⊕ 0′. We next prove that for every real X ≥tt 0′ there is a real Y such that Y ⊕ 0′ ≡ttY′ ≡ttX. Finally, we use this to demonstrate that every automorphism of the truth-table degrees is fixed on a cone.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 679 - 688
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Cooper, B. S., 01 2008, private communication.Google Scholar
[2]Kjos-Hanssen, B., A rigid cone in the truth-table degrees with jump, arXiv: 0901:3949 [math. LO], preprint.Google Scholar
[3]Kjos-Hanssen, B., 04 2008, private communication.Google Scholar
[4]Kjos-Hanssen, B., Merkle, W., and Stephan, F., Kolomogorov complexity and the recursion theorem, STACS 2006: 23rd annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (Marseilles, France), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3884, Springer, 2006, pp. 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Kučera, A., 11 2007, private communication.Google Scholar
[6]Kučera, A. and Slaman, T. A., Low upper bounds of ideals, preprint.Google Scholar
[7]Kumabe, M. and Lewis, A., A fixed point free minimal degree, preprint.Google Scholar
[8]Miller, J. S., Π10 classes in computable analysis and topology, Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, 2002.Google Scholar
[9]Mohrherr, J., Density of a final segment of the truth-table degrees, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 115 (1984), pp. 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Mytilinaios, M. E. and Slaman, T. A., Differences between resource bounded degree structures, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 44 (2003), no. 12, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Nerode, A. and Shore, R. A., Reducibility orderings: theories, definability, and automorphisms, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 18 (1980), pp. 61–89.Google Scholar
[12]Odifreddi, P. G., Classical recursion theory, Elsevier, 1999.Google Scholar
[13]Sacks, G. E., Recursive enumerability and the jump operator, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 108 (1963), no. 2, pp. 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Shore, R. A., Rigidity and biinterpretability in the hyperdegrees, Recursion theory workshop: Proceedings of the IMS program, Computational prospects of infinity (Chong, C. T., Qi, F., and Yang, Y., editors), World Scientific Publishing Company, 2007, to appear.Google Scholar
[15]Shore, R. A., 02 2008, private communication.Google Scholar
[16]Shore, R. A. and Slaman, T. A.. Defining the Turing jump, Mathematical Research Letters, vol. 6 (1999), no. 5–6, pp. 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Slaman, T. A. and Woodin, W. H., Decidability in degree structures, to appear.Google Scholar
[18]Soare, R. I., Recursively enumerable sets and degrees, Springer-Verlag, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar