Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:14:40.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A coding theorem for isols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Erik Ellentuck*
Affiliation:
RutgersThe State University, University of Kyoto

Extract

In [1] it is shown that for every sequence x = 〈xn : nω〉 ∈ Xω Λ there is an isol xω (essentially an immunized product) such that

Here we have used the notation: Λ = the isols, ω = the nonnegative integers, pn is the nth prime rational integer starting with p0 = 2, ∣ denotes divisibility and ∤ its negation. If p is an arbitrary prime, pyx, pzx, and y < z then py+1x. In particular since yω is comparable with every element of Λ, the conditions pyx and py+1x uniquely determine y. Thus every sequence xXωω is uniquely determined by an xω satisfying (1) and consequently may be used as a “code” for that sequence. In Theorem 1 it is shown that (1) does not uniquely determine the values of an arbitrary sequence xXωΛ, however in Theorem 3 we find a different scheme which does. At the very end of the paper we give some reasons why coding theorems are useful. It should also be mentioned that for a coding theorem to be meaningful it is necessary to restrict the operations by which a sequence can be recaptured from its code. Otherwise a triviality results. Our coding theorem will allow all operations which are first order definable in Λ with respect to addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. We conjecture that the latter operation is really necessary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Dekker, J. C. E. and Myhill, J., The divisibility of isols by powers of primes, Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 73 (1960), pp. 127133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Dekker, J. C. E. and Myhill, J., Recursive equivalence types, University of California Publications in Mathematics (N.S.), vol. 3 (1960), pp. 67214.Google Scholar
[3]Ellentuck, E., Universal isols, Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 98 (1967), pp. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Fuhrken, G., Skolem-type normal forms for first order languages with a generalized quantifier, Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 54 (1964), pp. 291302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Nerode, A., Extensions to isols, Annals of mathematics, vol. 73 (1961), pp. 362403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Nerode, A., Non-linear combinatorial functions of isols, Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 86 (1965), pp. 410424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar