Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:17:44.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Complexity of intrinsically r.e. subsets of existentially decidable models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

John Chisholm*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Western Illinois University, Macomb, Illinois 61455

Extract

Recursive model theory involves the study of relationships between recursion theory and model theory. One direction this often takes is to study the effectiveness of various aspects of model theory. This paper examines such questions by examining some properties of recursive models; that is, models whose basic relations, functions, and constants are all uniformly recursive (and whose universe is the set of natural numbers). Somewhat more precisely:

Let be a model whose universe is N, and let (θ())i be an effective enumeration of all quantifier-free formulas of the language of . Then is recursive if {〈, i〉: satisfies (θ())i, in } is a recursive subset of N. (Here and throughout the paper, 〈 〉 denotes an effective pairing function, or an effective coding of sequences, as required.) Similarly, let (ϕ())i be an effective enumeration of all existential formulas of the language of . Then is existentially decidable if {, i〉: satisfies (ϕ())i in } is a recursive subset of N.

It is clear that if is recursive and is a model isomorphic to , then may lose many of the recursive properties of . In the simplest example, could easily fail to be a recursive model. But even if we require that be a recursive model, it could still fail to retain other recursive properties of . An example of the sort of property which can be studied in this vein is the following notion, introduced by Ash and Nerode in [2].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Ash, C. J., Stability of recursive structures in arithmetical degrees, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 32 (1986), pp. 111135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Ash, C. J. and Nerode, A., Intrinsically recursive relations, Aspects of recursive algebra (Crossley, J., editor), Upside Down A Book Co., Steel's Creek, Australia, 1981, pp. 2641.Google Scholar
[3]Goncharov, S. S., The quantity of nonautoequivalent constructivizations, Algebra and Logic, vol. 16 (1977), pp. 169185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Keisler, H. J., Model theory for infinite logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971.Google Scholar
[5]Manasse, Mark Steven, Techniques and counterexamples in almost categorical recursive model theory, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 1982.Google Scholar
[6]Nurtazin, A. T., Strong and weak constructivizations and computable families, Algebra and Logic, vol. 13 (1974), pp. 311323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Rogers, Hartley Jr., Theory of recursive functions and effective computability, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.Google Scholar