Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:17:08.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Definable equivalence relations on algebraically closed fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Lou van den Dries
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
David Marker
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60680
Gary Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Bard College, Annandale on Hudson, New York 12504

Extract

This article was inspired by the question: is there a definable equivalence relation on the field of complex numbers, each of whose equivalence classes has exactly two elements? The answer turned out to be no, as we now explain in greater detail.

Let Κ be an algebraically closed field and let E be a definable equivalence relation on Κ. [Note: By “definable” we will always mean “definable with parameters”.] Either E has one cofinite class, or all classes are finite and there is a number d such that all but a finite set of classes have cardinality d. In the latter case let B be the finite set of elements of Κ which are not in a class of size d. We prove the following result.

Theorem 1. a) If char(Κ) = 0 or char(Κ) = p > d, thenB∣ ≡ 1 (mod d).

b) If char(Κ) = 2 and d = 2, thenB∣ ≡ 0 (mod 2).

c) If char(Κ) = p > 2 and d = p + s, where 1 ≤ sp/2, thenB∣ ≡ p + 1 (mod d).

Furthermore, a)−c) are the only restrictions onB≡.

If one is in the right mood, one can view this theorem as saying that the “algebraic cardinality” of the complex numbers is congruent to 1 (mod n) for every n.

§1 contains a reduction of the problem to the special case where E is induced by a rational function in one variable. §2 contains the main calculations and the proofs of a)−c). §3 contains eight families of examples showing that all else is possible. In §4 we prove an analogous result for real closed fields.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[J]Jacobson, N., Basic algebra. II, Freeman, San Francisco, California, 1980.Google Scholar
[M]Mumford, D., Algebraic geometry. I: Complex projective varieties, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976.Google Scholar
[P-S]Pillay, A. and Steinhorn, C., Definable sets in ordered structures. I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 295 (1986), pp. 565592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[P]Poizat, B., Une théorie de Galois imaginaire, this Journal, vol. 48 (1983), pp. 11511170.Google Scholar