Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:48:09.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Higher gap morasses, Ia: Gap-two morasses and condensation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Charles Morgan
Charles Morgan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, England E-mail: charles.morgan@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper concerns the theory of morasses. In the early 1970s Jensen defined (k, α)-morasses for uncountable regular cardinals k and ordinals α < k. In the early 1980s Velleman defined (k, 1)-simplified morasses for all regular cardinals k. He showed that there is a (k, 1)-simplified morass if and only if there is (k, 1)-morass. More recently he defined (k, 2)-simplified morasses and Jensen was able to show that if there is a (k, 2)-morass then there is a (k, 2)-simplified morass.

In this paper we prove the converse of Jensen's result, i.e., that if there is a (k, 2)-simplified morass then there is a (k, 2)-morass.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 753 - 787
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Devlin, K., Aspects of constructibility, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 354, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Devlin, K., Constructibility, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Dodd, A., Constructibility, two cardinals problems and the gap-n theorems, M. sc. dissertation, Oxford, 1974.Google Scholar
[4]Donder, H.-D., Another look at gap-1 morasses, Recursion theory, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 42, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1985, pp. 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Jensen, R., There is a gap two Velleman morass in L, handwritten notes, circulated 1987.Google Scholar
[6]Morgan, C. J. G., The equivalence of morasses and simplified morasses—the general case, D. phil. thesis, Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
[7]Devlin, K., Higher gap morasses, Ib: Finite gap morasses—the general case, in preparation, 1993.Google Scholar
[8]Stanley, L., A short course on gap-one morasses and a review of the fine structure of L in “Surveys in set theory”, (A. R. D. Mathias, editor), London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series, vol. 87, 1982, pp. 197–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Velleman, D., Simplified morasses, this Journal, vol. 49 (1984), pp. 257–271.Google Scholar
[10]Velleman, D., Simplified gap-2 morasses, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 34 (1987), pp. 171–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar