Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:15:18.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Horn sentences in identity theory1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

K. I. Appel*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan

Extract

Horn [2] obtained a sufficient condition for an elementary class to be closed under direct product. Chang and Morel [1] showed that this is not a necessary condition. We will show that, if consideration is restricted to identity theory, that is, a first-order predicate calculus with equality but no other relation symbols or operation symbols, Horn's condition is necessary and sufficient.

A model for identity theory consists of a non-empty domain A, but no relations or operations except equality. If I is an index set, and for each is a model for identity theory, then the direct product of the is a model for identity theory and has domain A, the cartesian product of the Ai.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper is a portion of a dissertation submitted to the graduate school of the University of Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. The author wishes to thank Professor R. C. Lyndon for his guidance and encouragement and Professor John Addison for his many suggestions.

References

[1]Chang, C. C. and Morel, A., On closure under direct product, this Journal, vol. 23 (1958), pp. 149154.Google Scholar
[2]Horn, A., On sentences which are true of direct unions, this Journal, vol. 16 (1951), pp. 1421.Google Scholar