Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:32:38.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ideal structure of existentially closed algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Paul C. Eklof  and
Hans-Christian Mez
Paul C. Eklof
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Californiaat Irvine Irvine, California 92717
Hans-Christian Mez
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Californiaat Irvine Irvine, California 92717
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Throughout this paper, ⊿ will denote a commutative ring with multiplicative identity, 1. The algebras we consider will be associative ⊿-algebras which are not necessarily commutative and do not necessarily contain a multiplicative identity. By standard methods, every ⊿-algebra can be embedded in an existentially closed (e.c.) Δ-algebra—and even in one which is existentially universal (e.u.). (See §0 for more details.)

We shall be studying the ideals of e.c. ⊿-algebras. Since every ideal is a sum of principal ideals, a natural place to begin is with principal ideals. In §1 we show that for an algebraically closed (a.c.) ⊿-algebra A, and elements a, b in A, whether or not b belongs to the principal ideal (a)A generated by a, depends only on the underlying ⊿-module structure of A; more precisely, for b to belong to (a)A it is necessary and sufficient that b satisfies every positive existential formula θ(ν) in the language of ⊿-modules which is satisfied by a (cf. Corollary 1.8). For special classes of rings ⊿ this condition can be simplified (Proposition 1.10): e.g. for Prüfer rings it is enough to consider formulas of the form ∃x(λx = μν); and for regular rings it is enough to consider formulas μν = 0 (where λ, μ ∈ ⊿).

In §2 we use the results of §1 to study e.c. and e.u. algebras over a principal ideal domain (p.i.d.) ⊿ (Note that for ⊿ = Z this includes the case of e.c. rings.) We obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for an a.c. ⊿-algebra to be e.c. (Theorem 2.4). We also show (Theorem 2.2) that in an a.c. ⊿-algebra A every element that is divisible by all nonzero elements of ⊿ belongs to the divisible part D(A) of A. (It should be noted that, while a.c. ⊿-modules are always divisible [ES], an e.c. ⊿-algebra is never divisible: see the end of §0. Moreover, an e.c. ⊿-algebra always contains torsion-free elements: see Remark 2.3.) We prove that every bounded ideal in an a.c. ⊿-algebra is principal (2.7).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , December 1985 , pp. 1025 - 1043
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[BT]Belyaev, V. Ya. and Taĭtslin, M. A., On elementary properties of existentially closed systems, Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk, vol. 34 (1979), no. 2, pp. 39–94; English translation in Russian Mathematical Surveys, vol. 34 (1979), no. 2, pp. 43–107.Google Scholar
[B]Bokut′, L. A., Some embedding theorems for rings and semigroups, Sibirskiǐ Matematicheskiĭ Zhurnal, vol. 4 (1963), pp. 500–518, 729–743. (Russian) MR 27 # #2530, 3672.Google Scholar
[C1]Cohn, P. M., Universal algebra, 2nd ed., Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[C2]Cohn, P. M., On the free product of associative rings, Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 71 (1969), pp. 380–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[E]Eklof, P. C., Ultraproducts for algebraists, Handbook of Mathematical Logic (Barwise, J., editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 105–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[EM]Eklof, P. C. and Mez, H.-C., Additive groups of existentially closed rings, to appear in the proceedings of the Udine conference on abelian groups and modules, CISM series.Google Scholar
[ES]Eklof, P. C. and Sabbagh, G., Model-completions and modules, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 2 (1971), pp. 251–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[F]Fuchs, L., Infinite abelian groups, vols. 1, 2, Academic Press, New York, 1970, 1973.Google Scholar
[Ga]Garavaglia, S., Dimension and rank in the model theory of modules, preprint.Google Scholar
[G]Goodearl, K. R., Von Neumann regular rings, Pitman, London, 1979.Google Scholar
[HW]Hirschfeld, J. and Wheeler, H. W., Forcing, arithmetic, and division rings, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 454, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[K]Kaplansky, I., Infinite abelian groups, rev. ed., University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1969.Google Scholar
[Mc]McCoy, N. H., The theory of rings, reprint, Chelsea, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
[M1]Mez, H.-Ch., Existentiell abgeschlossene Ringe und Algebren, thesis, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 1982.Google Scholar
[M2]Mez, H.-Ch., Combinatorial extensions of radical, nil and locally nilpotent algebras, Journal of Algebra (to appear).Google Scholar
[R]Rotman, J., An introduction to homological algebra, Academic Press, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
[RY]Rotman, J. and Yen, T., Modules over a complete discrete valuation ring, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 98 (1961), pp. 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sz]Szász, F. A., Radicals of rings, Wiley, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
[W1]Warfield, R. B. Jr., Purify and algebraic compactness for modules, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 28 (1969), pp. 699–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[W2]Warfield, R. B. Jr., Decomposability of finitely presented modules, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 25 (1970), pp. 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Z]Ziegler, M., Model theory of modules, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 26 (1984), pp. 149–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar