Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:33:01.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mathematics as natural science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Nicolas D. Goodman
Nicolas D. Goodman*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14214
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mathematics is a natural science whose great generality makes many philosophers think of it as a supernatural science, consisting of truths derived independently of experience about objects not given in experience. Some mathematicians, like Simpson [16], try to defend mathematics from the resulting objection that it is merely a mental game by first conceding that most of it is meaningless and then trying to save what is left by some technical tour de force. Some physicists, like Wigner [20], admit that mathematics is applicable to the world, but declare themselves unable to understand what makes its applications possible. Both Simpson's worries and Wigner's puzzlement can be relieved if we assimilate mathematics more closely to the other natural sciences.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 182 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Allaire, F., Another proof of the four-color theorem. I, Proceedings of the seventh Manitoba conference on numerical mathematics and computing, Congressus Numerantium, vol. 20, Utilitas Mathematica Publishing, Winnipeg, 1978, pp. 3–72.Google Scholar
[2]Appel, K., Haken, W., and Koch, J., Every planar map is four-colorable, Illinois Journal of Mathematics, vol. 21 (1977), pp. 429–567.Google Scholar
[3]Bishop, E. and Bridges, D., Constructive analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Corcoran, J., Review of [12], Mathematical Reviews 82e: 03013.Google Scholar
[5]Feyerabend, P., Against method, Thetford Press, Thetford, England, 1978.Google Scholar
[6]Fourman, M. P., The logic of topoi, Handbook of mathematical logic (Barwise, J., editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 1053–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Goodman, N. D., The experiential foundations of mathematical knowledge, History and Philosophy of Logic, vol. 2 (1981), pp. 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Goodman, N. D., The knowing mathematician, Synthèse, vol. 60 (1984), pp. 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Goodman, N. D., Intensions, Church's thesis, and the formalization of mathematics, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 28 (1987), pp. 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hardy, G. H., A mathematician's apology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1940.Google Scholar
[11]Kitcher, P., The nature of mathematical knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1984.Google Scholar
[12]Kline, M., Mathematics: the loss of certainty, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1980.Google Scholar
[13]Kuhn, T. S., The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd. ed., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1970.Google Scholar
[14]Martin, D. A., Hilbert's first problem: the continuum hypothesis, Mathematical developments arising from Hilbert problems (Browder, F. E., editor), Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 28, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1976, pp. 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Rorty, R., Philosophy and the mirror of nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1979.Google Scholar
[16]Simpson, S. G., Partial realizations of Hilbert's program, this Journal, vol. 53 (1988), pp. 349–363.Google Scholar
[17]Sparrow, C., The Lorenz equations: bifurcations, chaos, and strange attractors, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Swart, E. R., The philosophical implications of the four-color problem, The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 87 (1980), pp. 697–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Tymoczko, T., The four-color problem and its philosophical significance, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 76 (1979), pp. 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Wigner, E. P., The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 13 (1960), pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar