Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T08:49:51.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A non-standard construction of Haar measure and weak König's lemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Kazuyuki Tanaka  and
Takeshi Yamazaki
Kazuyuki Tanaka
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578Japan
Takeshi Yamazaki
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we show within RCA0 that weak König's lemma is necessary and sufficient to prove that any (separable) compact group has a Haar measure. Within WKL0, a Haar measure is constructed by a non-standard method based on a fact that every countable non-standard model of WKL0 has a proper initial part isomorphic to itself [10].

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 173 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bishop, E., Foundations of constructive analysis, McGraw-Hill, 1967.Google Scholar
[2]Brown, D. K. and Simpson, S. G., Which set existence axioms are needed to prove the separable Hahn-Banach theorem?, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 31 (1986), pp. 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Hausner, M., On a non-standard construction of Haar measure, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 25 (1972), pp. 403–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Pontryagin, L. S., Topological groups, second ed., Gordon and Breach science, 1966, translated from Russian by A. Brown.Google Scholar
[5]Shioji, N. and Tanaka, K., Fixed point theory in weak second order arithmetic, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 47 (1990), pp. 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Simpson, S. G., Which set existence axioms are needed to prove the Cauchy-Peano theorem for ordinary differential equations?, this Journal, vol. 49 (1984), pp. 783–802.Google Scholar
[7]Simpson, S. G., Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic, Springer, 1998.Google Scholar
[8]Tanaka, K., Reverse mathematics and subsystems of second-order arithmetic, American Mathematical Society, Sugaku Expositions, vol. 5 (1992), pp. 213–234.Google Scholar
[9]Tanaka, K., Non-standard analysis in WKL0, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 43 (1997), pp. 396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Tanaka, K., The self-embedding theorem of WKL0 and a non-standard method, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 84 (1997), pp. 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Yu, X., Riesz representation theorem, Borel measures and subsystems of second-order arithmetic, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 59 (1993), pp. 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Yu, X. and Simpson, S. G., Measure theory and weak KÖnig's lemma. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 30 (1990), pp. 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar