Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:23:03.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The positive properties of isolic integers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Erik Ellentuck*
Affiliation:
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903

Extract

In this paper we show (cf. Theorem 22) that in a language L* with equality, whose relation symbols denote arbitrary relations over ω* (=rational integers) and whose function symbols denote (= ∃∀ definable in the arithmetic hierarchy) functions over ω*, (i) a positive sentence is true in Λ* (= isolic integers) iff some Horn reduct is true in ω* with Skolem functions. We also show (cf Theorem 20) that (ii) a universally quantified sentence is true in Λ* iff some Horn reduct is true in Λ*.The latter result is nontrivial because our relations are arbitrary and our functions are In order to obtain (i) it was necessary to generalize the frame extensions of [7]. This is done in §2. Our extension procedure agrees with that of [7] for recursive relations (cf. Theorem 12), and is certainly more general for relations. What happens in the case is still open. In §3 we develop the basic properties of our extension so that in §4 we can prove a metatheorem (cf. Theorems 8 and 10) about Λ (=isols), in a language L with equality whose relation symbols denote arbitrary relations over ω (=nonnegative integers) and whose function symbols denote almost R↑ combinatorial functions. In Theorem 11 this is generalized to infinitary universal sentences. In §5 generic isols are introduced. These are used (cf. Theorems 16–19) to generalize and simplify the “fundamental lemma” of [8]. The basic induction is patterned after Lemma 4.1 of [8], but is stronger in that any sufficiently generic assignment attainable from a frame yields Skolem functions. Finally in §6 these results are applied to Λ*, yielding the titled result (i) of our paper. Immediately following Theorem 15 there is a discussion which attempts to justify the way we extend relations to Λ.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Cohen, P. J., Set theory and the continuum hypothesis, Benjamin, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
[2]Ellentuck, E., Universal isols, Mathematische Zeitscrift, vol. 98 (1967), pp. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Ellentuck, E., Extension methods in cardinal arithmetic, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 149 (1970), pp. 307325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Ellentuck, E., Nonrecursive combinatorial functions, this Journal, vol. 37 (1972), pp. 9095.Google Scholar
[5]Ellentuck, E., Nonrecursive relations among the isols, to appear.Google Scholar
[6]Gold, E. M., Limiting recursion, this Journal, vol. 30 (1965), pp. 2848.Google Scholar
[7]Nerode, A., Extensions to isols, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 73 (1961), pp. 362403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Nerode, A., Extensions to isolic integers, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 75 (1962), pp. 419448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Nerode, A., Combinatorial series and recursive equivalence types, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 58 (1966), pp. 113141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Nerode, A., Diophantine correct non-standard models in the isols, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 84 (1966), pp. 421432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar