Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:25:14.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RECURRENCE AND THE EXISTENCE OF INVARIANT MEASURES

Part of: Classical measure theory Set theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2021

MANUEL J. INSELMANN  and
BENJAMIN D. MILLER
MANUEL J. INSELMANN
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA OSKAR MORGERNSTERN PLATZ 1, 1090VIENNA, AUSTRIAE-mail: manuel.inselmann@univie.ac.atE-mail: benjamin.miller@univie.ac.atURL: https://homepage.univie.ac.at/benjamin.miller
BENJAMIN D. MILLER
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA OSKAR MORGERNSTERN PLATZ 1, 1090VIENNA, AUSTRIAE-mail: manuel.inselmann@univie.ac.atE-mail: benjamin.miller@univie.ac.atURL: https://homepage.univie.ac.at/benjamin.miller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that recurrence conditions do not yield invariant Borel probability measures in the descriptive set-theoretic milieu, in the strong sense that if a Borel action of a locally compact Polish group on a standard Borel space satisfies such a condition but does not have an orbit supporting an invariant Borel probability measure, then there is an invariant Borel set on which the action satisfies the condition but does not have an invariant Borel probability measure.

Keywords

invariant measurerecurrencetransiencewandering

MSC classification

Primary: 03E15: Descriptive set theory
Secondary: 28A05: Classes of sets (Borel fields, $sigma$-rings, etc.), measurable sets, Suslin sets, analytic sets
Type
Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 60 - 76
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Association for Symbolic Logic 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, H. and Kechris, A. S., The descriptive set theory of Polish group actions , London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 232, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eigen, S., Hajian, A., and Nadkarni, M. G., Weakly wandering sets and compressibility in descriptive setting . Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences – Mathematical Sciences , vol. 103 (1993), no. 3, pp. 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, J. and Moore, C. C., Ergodic equivalence relations, cohomology, and von Neumann algebras. I . Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , vol. 234 (1977), no. 2, pp. 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greschonig, G. and Schmidt, K., Ergodic decomposition of quasi-invariant probability measures . Colloquium Mathematicum , vol. 84/85 (2000), no. part 2, pp. 495–514. Dedicated to the memory of Anzelm Iwanik.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, L. A., Kechris, A. S., and Louveau, A., A Glimm-Effros dichotomy for Borel equivalence relations . Journal ofAmerican Mathematical Society , vol. 3 (1990), no. 4, pp. 903–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, I., Miller, B. D., and Simon, P., The Borel cardinality of Lascar strong types . Journal of London Mathematical Society (2) , vol. 90 (2014), no. 2, pp. 609–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kechris, A. S., Countable sections for locally compact group actions . Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , vol. 12 (1992), no. 2, pp. 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kechris, A. S., Classical descriptive set theory , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 156, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kechris, A. S. and Miller, B. D., Topics in orbit equivalence , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1852, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louveau, A. and Mokobodzki, G., On measures ergodic with respect to an analytic equivalence relation . Transactions of the American Mathematical Society vol. 349 (1997), no. 12, pp. 4815–4823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, B., The existence of measures of a given cocycle. I. Atomless, ergodic $\sigma$ -finite measures. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , vol. 28 (2008), no. 5, pp. 1599–1613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, B., The existence of measures of a given cocycle. II. Probability measures . Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , vol. 28 (2008), no. 5, pp. 1615–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, B. D., Full groups, classification, and equivalence relations , Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2004.Google Scholar
Nadkarni, M. G., On the existence of a finite invariant measure . Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences – Mathematical Sciences , vol. 100 (1990), no. 3, pp. 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, S. M., Selection theorems for ${G}_{\delta }$ -valued multifunctions. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , vol. 254 (1979), pp. 283–293.Google Scholar
Tserunyan, A., Finite generators for countable group actions in the Borel and Baire category settings . Advances in Mathematics , vol. 269 (2015), pp. 585–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, B., Minimal models for free actions, Dynamical systems and group actions , Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 567, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012, pp. 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakrzewski, P., The existence of invariant probability measures for a group of transformations . Israel Journal of Mathematics , vol. 83 (1993), no. 3, pp. 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar