Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:07:44.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stationary subsets of [ℵω]<ωn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Kecheng Liu
Kecheng Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine, California 92717
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, assuming large cardinals, we prove the consistency of the following:

Let n ∈ ω and k1, k2 ≤ n. Let f: ω → {k1, k2} be such that for all n1 < n2 ∈ f−1{k1},n2 − n1 ≥ 4. Then the set

is stationary in

The above is equivalent to the statement that for any structure on on ℵω, there is ≺ A such that ∣∣ = ωn and for all m > n, cf( ∩ ωm) = ωf(m).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 1201 - 1218
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Baumgartner, J., On the size of closed unbounded sets, manuscript.Google Scholar
[2]Baumgartner, J., Iterated forcing, Surveys in set theory, Cambridge University Press, London and New York, 1983, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
[3]Foreman, M., More saturated ideals, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1019, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, and Heidelberg, 1983.Google Scholar
[4]Foreman, M., Large cardinals and strong model theoretic transfer properties, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 272 (1982), pp. 427–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Kanamori, A. and Magidor, M., The evolution of large cardinal axioms in set theory. Higher set theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 669, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, and Heidelberg, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kunen, K., Saturated ideals, this Journal, vol. 43 (1978), pp. 65–76.Google Scholar
[7]Kunen, K., Set theory. An introduction to independence proofs, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.Google Scholar
[8]Laver, R., An (ℵ2, ℵ2, ℵ0)-saturated ideal on ω, Logic colloquium 1980 (Prague), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.Google Scholar
[9]Martin, D., Infinite games, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Helsinki, 1978), ICM, 1980, pp. 269–273.Google Scholar