Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T12:09:33.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A theory of restricted quantification II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Theodore Hailperin
Theodore Hailperin*
Affiliation:
Lehigh University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Part I of this paper no official significance was given to free occurrences of restricted-variables. Indeed doubt has been expressed as to the desirability or feasibility of such usage. Thus, to quote from Rosser [4], p. 146:

“We now raise the question of the significance of F (α), in which the occurrences of α are free [α a variable subject to the restriction K(α)]. In deciding to take (x).K(x) ⊃ F(x) and (Ex).K(x).F(x) as the meanings of (α)F(α) and (Eα)F(α), we were guided by the intuitive meanings. In the case of F(α), the intuitive meaning does not furnish a satisfactory guide. In everyday mathematics, if it has been agreed that α stands for a quantity satisfying the restriction K(α), it is commonly the case that, if one is assuming F (α), then K(α)&F(α) is understood, but if one is trying to prove F (α), then K(α) ⊃ F (α) is understood. It seems that in symbolic logic perhaps it is best not to give any especial significance to α in F(α) when it occurs free.”

Despite this anomalous behaviour we shall, in this Part, show how one can have unhampered use of free restricted-variables in appropriate contexts.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1957 , pp. 113 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADDITIONAL REFERENCES

[9]Quine, W. V., On natural deduction, this Journal, vol. 15 (1950), pp. 93–102.Google Scholar
[10]Wang, Hao, On denumerable bases of formal systems, Mathematical interpretation of formal systems. Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1955, pp. 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Jaakko, K.Hintikka, J., Distributive normal forms in the calculus of predicates. Acta Philosophica Fenilica, no. 6 Helsinki 1953.Google Scholar
[12]Whitehead, A. N. and Russell, B., Principia mathematica, vols. I–III, second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1925–1927.Google Scholar