Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:57:35.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three theorems on recursive enumeration. I. Decomposition. II. Maximal set. III. Enumeration without duplication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Richard M. Friedberg*
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Extract

In this paper we shall prove three theorems about recursively enumerable sets. The first two answer questions posed by Myhill [1].

The three proofs are independent and can be presented in any order. Certain notations will be common to all three. We shall denote by “Re” the set enumerated by the procedure of which e is the Gödel number. In describing the construction for each proof, we shall suppose that a clerk is carrying out the simultaneous enumeration of R0, R1, R2, …, in such a way that at each step only a finite number of sets have begun to be enumerated and only a finite number of the members of any set have been listed. (One plan the clerk can follow is to turn his attention at Step a to the enumeration of Re where e+1 is the number of prime factors of a. Then each Re receives his attention infinitely often.) We shall denote by “Rea” the set of numbers which, at or before Step a, the clerk has listed as members of Re. Obviously, all the Rea are finite sets, recursive uniformly in e and a. For any a we can determine effectively the highest e for which Rea is not empty, and for any a, e we can effectively find the highest member of Rea, just by scanning what the clerk has done by Step a. Additional notations will be introduced in the proofs to which they pertain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1]Myhill, J. R., this Journal, vol. 21, p. 215 (1956), Problems 8 and 9.Google Scholar
[2]Post, Emil L., Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 50, pp. 284316 (1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar