Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:32:04.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Undecidable theories of Lyndon algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Vera Stebletsova  and
Yde Venema
Vera Stebletsova
Affiliation:
Department of Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1081A, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands, E-mail: Vera.Stebletsova@phil.uu.nl
Yde Venema
Affiliation:
Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Plantage Muidergracht 24, NL-1018 TV Amsterdam, The Netherlands, E-mail: yde@wins.uva.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With each projective geometry we can associate a Lyndon algebra. Such an algebra always satisfies Tarski's axioms for relation algebras and Lyndon algebras thus form an interesting connection between the fields of projective geometry and algebraic logic. In this paper we prove that if G is a class of projective geometries which contains an infinite projective geometry of dimension at least three, then the class L(G) of Lyndon algebras associated with projective geometries in G has an undecidable equational theory. In our proof we develop and use a connection between projective geometries and diagonal-free cylindric algebras.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 207 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Andréka, H., Givant, S., and Németi, I., Decision problems for equational theories of relation algebras, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Garner, L., An outline of projective geometry, Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1981.Google Scholar
[3]Givant, S., Universal classes of simple relation algebras, this Journal, vol. 64 (1999), pp. 575–589.Google Scholar
[4]Henkin, L., Monk, J. D., and Tarski, A., Cylindric algebras, Part 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971.Google Scholar
[5]Henkin, L., Monk, J. D., and Tarski, A., Cylindric algebras, Part 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.Google Scholar
[6]Jipsen, P., Discriminator varieties of Boolean algebras with residuated operators, Algebraic methods in logic and computer science (Rauszer, C., editor), Banach Center Publications, vol. 28, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, 1993, pp. 239–252.Google Scholar
[7]Jónsson, B., Representation of modular lattices and of relation algebras, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 92 (1959), pp. 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Jónsson, B., Varieties of relation algebras, Algebra Universalis, vol. 15 (1982), pp. 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Jónsson, B. and Tarski, A., Boolean algebras with operators, Part 2, American Journal of Mathematics, vol. 74 (1952), pp. 127–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Lyndon, R., Relation algebras and projective geometries, Michigan Mathematics Journal, vol. 8 (1961), pp. 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Maddux, R., The equational theory of CA3 is undecidable, this Journal, vol. 45 (1980), pp. 311–316.Google Scholar
[12]Marx, M. and Venema, Y., Multi-dimensional modal logic, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Monk, J. D., On representable relation algebras, Michigan Mathematical Journal, vol. 11 (1964), pp. 207–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Németi, I., Algebraization of quantifier logics, an introductory overview, Studia Logica, vol. 50 (1991), pp. 485–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Stebletsova, V., Modal logic of projective geometries of finite dimension, Technical Report 184, Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, 1998.Google Scholar
[16]Tarski, A. and Givant, S., A formalization of set theory without variables, AMS Colloquium Publications, vol. 41, 1988.Google Scholar
[17]Venema, Y., Points, lines and diamonds: a two-sorted modal logic for projective planes, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 9 (1999), pp. 601–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar