Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:34:09.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ingrouping, Outgrouping, and the Pragmatics of Peripheral Speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2017

CASSIE HERBERT  and
REBECCA KUKLA
CASSIE HERBERT
Affiliation:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYcmh225@georgetown.edu
REBECCA KUKLA
Affiliation:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYrkukla@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Speech does not merely reflect social identity; it helps create it, by ingrouping and outgrouping individuals and establishing and clarifying community boundaries and norms of membership. We define a pragmatic category of community-specific speech that is used by and directed at community insiders. We focus on a species of community-specific speech that has flown under the philosophical radar, a type of speech we term peripheral speech: Peripheral speech is informal, typically playful, insider speech that includes inside jokes, riffs, gossip, insider references; it is loosely constrained, and only those who have skills and normative competence characteristic of a community can play along successfully. Peripheral speech is shared by a community, but also used to bring people into it and cast people out of it. We argue that entitlement to peripheral speech requires a type of speaker authority that is not granted by way of established rules and conventions, but rather settled locally and in situ.

Keywords

philosophy of languagepragmaticssocial philosophysocial groupsphilosophy of mindpersonal identity
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , Winter 2016 , pp. 576 - 596
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albertson, Bethany. (2015) ‘Dog Whistle Politics: Multivocal Communication and Religious Appeals’. Political Behavior, 37, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elijah. (1990) StreetWise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis (1971) ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses’. In Althusser, Louis, Lenin and Philosophy, trans. Ben Brewster (New York: Monthly Review Press), 121–176.Google Scholar
Altucher, James. (2013) ‘How to Break All the Rules and Get Everything You Want’. Available at: http://jamesaltucher.quora.com/How-To-Break-All-The-Rules-And-Get-Everything-You-Want. Accessed 19 May 2016.Google Scholar
Anderson, Luvell. (Forthcoming) ‘Notorious Thugs’. In Yancy, George (ed.), Black and Male: Critical Voices from Behind the Racial Veil.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, Talbot. (2005) ‘Patina of the Past: Meditations on Memory and Home’. Hedgehog Review, 7, 46–55.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. (1997) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. ([1966]1978) ‘Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences’. In Derrida, Jacques, Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 232–250.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (2016) ‘Trump Campaign Defends Tweet as a “Basic Star” in Wake of Criticism’. Available at: http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/02/politics/donald-trump-tweet-graphic-star-hillary-clinton/. Accessed 22 September 2016.Google Scholar
Dzuria, Jen. (2013) ‘When Life Hacking is Really White Privilege’. Available at: https://medium.com/get-bullish/when-life-hacking-is-really-white-privilege-a5e5f4e9132f#.yfn7cegi6. Accessed 19 May 2016.Google Scholar
Gamble, Victoria. (1997) ‘Under the Shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and Health Care’. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1773–78.Google Scholar
Herbert, Cassie. (2015) ‘Precarious Projects: The Performative Structure of Reclamation’. Language Sciences, 52, 131–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, Cassie. (n.d.) ‘Identity and Discursive Signaling’. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca. (2010) ‘Myth, Memory, and Misrecognition in Sellars’ “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”’. Philosophical Studies, 101, 161–211.Google Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca. (2002) ‘The Ontology and Temporality of Conscience’. Continental Philosophy Review, 35, 67–96.Google Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca. (2014) ‘Performative Force, Convention, and Discursive Injustice’. Hypatia, 29, 440–57.Google Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca, and Lance, Mark. (2009) ‘Yo!’ and ‘Lo!’: The Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. (2007) ‘The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience’. In Lacan, Jacques, Ecrits, Trans. Fink, B. (New York: Norton), 75–81.Google Scholar
Langton, Ray. (1993) ‘Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts'. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22, 305–30.Google Scholar
Langton, Ray. (2015) ‘Accommodating Injustice’. John Locke Lectures, Grove Auditorium, Magdalen College, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Langton, Ray, and Hornsby, Jennifer. (1998) ‘Free Speech and Illocution’. Legal Theory, 4, 21–38.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. (1987) ‘Playfulness, “World”-Travelling, and Loving Perception’. Hypatia, 2, 3–19.Google Scholar
Maitra, Ishani. (2012) ‘Subordinating Speech’. In Maitra, Ishani and McGowan, Mary Kate (eds.), Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech (New York: Oxford University Press), 94–120.Google Scholar
McGowan, Mary Kate. (2012) ‘On “Whites Only” Signs and Racist Hate Speech: Verbal Acts of Racial Discrimination’. In Maitra, Ishani and McGowan, Mary Kate (eds.), Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech (New York: Oxford University Press), 121–147.Google Scholar
Morrison, Toni. (1993) Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
National Annenberg Election Survey (2004) ‘Daily Show Viewers Knowledgeable about Presidential Campaign’. Annenberg Policy Center, press release 9/21/2004.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. (1989) On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. Translated by W. Kaufman. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. (n.d.) ‘Dog Whistles, Political Manipulation and Philosophy of Language’. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Tirrell, Lynne. (1999) ‘Derogatory Terms: Racism, Sexism, and the Inferential Role Theory of Meaning’. In Oliver, Kelly and Hendriks, Christina (eds.), Language and Liberation: Feminism, Philosophy, and Language (Albany: SUNY Press), 41–79.Google Scholar
Tirrell, Lynne. (2012) ‘Genocidal Language Games’. In Maitra, Ishani and McGowan, Mary Kate (eds.), Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech (New York: Oxford University Press), 174–221.Google Scholar
West, Lindy. (2013) ‘Woman in Tech Tweets About Sexist Dudes in Tech. Dude Gets Fired. Internet Meltdown Ensues’. Available at: http://jezebel.com/5991792/woman-in-tech-tweets-about-sexist-dudes-in-tech-dude-get-fired-internet-meltdown-ensues. Accessed 18 May 2016.Google Scholar
Young, Iris. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar